5 research outputs found

    The Korean Constitutional Court and Countermajoritarian Difficulty under the Roh Moo Hyun Administration: Analysis on Judicial Nullification Cases in Major Policy Issues

    No full text
    1987λ…„ ν•œκ΅­μ˜ λ―Όμ£Όν™”λŠ” λŒ€ν†΅λ Ή 직선 및 μž…λ²•λΆ€ 강화와 ν—Œλ²•μž¬νŒμ œλ„ μ‹ μ„€μ΄λΌλŠ” μ œλ„μ  ν‹€λ‘œ μ‹œμž‘λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μ „μžλŠ” 민주주의의 강화라면 ν›„μžλŠ” ν—Œμ •μ£Όμ˜μ˜ κ°•ν™”μ˜€λ‹€. ν•œκ΅­λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμ˜λŠ” 이후 μ‚¬λ²•λΆ€μ˜ 독립성 μ¦λŒ€μ™€ μ •μΉ˜μ˜ 사법화λ₯Ό κ²½ν—˜ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆκ³  특히 ν—Œλ²•μž¬νŒμ†Œ μ—­ν• μ˜ μ–‘μ Β·μ§ˆμ  νŒ½μ°½μ— μ§λ©΄ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ„œκ΅¬λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμ˜μ—μ„œ μ „ν†΅μ μœΌλ‘œ λŒ€λ‘λ˜μ–΄μ˜¨ μ‚¬λ²•λΆ€μ˜ λ°˜λ‹€μˆ˜μ œ 문제(countermajoritarian difficulty)κ°€ ν•œκ΅­μ •μΉ˜μ—μ„œ 도 μ€‘μš”ν•œ ν˜„μ‹€μ΄ λ˜μ—ˆλŠ” λ°” λ³Έκ³ μ—μ„œλŠ” 이λ₯Ό μ‹€μ¦μ μœΌλ‘œ κ²€ν† ν•˜λ €κ³  ν•œλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ λ―Έμ—°λ°©λŒ€λ²•μ›μ„ μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ 이 문제λ₯Ό 닀룬 μ—¬λŸ¬ λ…Όμ˜λ“€μ„ κ³ μ°°ν•˜κ³  λ‹€μ•Œμ˜ μž…λ²•λ‹€μˆ˜ κ°œλ…μ„ μ‚¬μš©, λ…Έλ¬΄ν˜„ μ •λΆ€ μ‹œκΈ° μ •μ±…μ΄μŠˆμ— λŒ€ν•œ ν—Œμž¬μ˜ μœ„ν—Œκ²°μ •μ„ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³Έλ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό μ€‘μ°¨λŒ€ν•œ 이슈의 사법화가 μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ‘Œμ§€λ§Œ ν—Œμž¬ κ²°μ •μ˜ μ‹€μ§ˆμ€ λ°˜λ‹€μˆ˜μ μ΄ μ•„λ‹ˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ™μ‹œμ— ν•©μ˜ 및 λŒ€μ•ˆν˜•μ„± λΆ€μž¬μ˜ λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμ˜κ°€ μ œμ™•μ  μœ„μΉ˜λ‘œ ν—Œμž¬λ₯Ό 자주 μ΄ˆμ²­ν•˜μ˜€λŠ” λ°”, 이런 μƒν™©μ˜ 지속은 λ§ˆμΉ¨λ‚΄ λ°˜λ‹€μˆ˜μ  κ²°μ •κ³Ό μ œμ™•μ  사법뢀λ₯Ό μ•ΌκΈ°ν•  μˆ˜λ„ μžˆμ„ 것이닀. κ²°κ΅­ μ§€κΈˆκΉŒμ§€μ˜ λ…Όμ˜λŠ” 쒋은 λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμ˜κ°€ 쒋은 ν—Œμ •μ£Όμ˜λ₯Ό κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜κ²Œ ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 것을 가리킀고 μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 보인닀. After the democratization in South Korea in 1987, the new Constitution was adopted which introduced the direct presidential election system with a more powerful legislature and new constitutional review system. As the Korean Constitutional Court gained more independence and started to deal with essential political issues, it grew to be an important political actor. Accordingly, the matter of countermajoritarian ifficulty, which has always been important in the U.S. politics, has also become very critical in Korea. Therefore this paper aims to empirically analyze this matter in Korean context. First, I reviewed various related arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court. Then, I analyzed the matter of countermajoritarian difficulty in the Korean Constitutional Court under the Roh Moo Hyun administration based on the concept of law-making majority of Dahl. In conclusion, the Korean Constitutional Courts decisions on major issues were not against a determined and persistent law making majority but against a unstable and transient majority. Also, the frequent invitation of Judiciary to the imperial status will possibly cause countermajoritarian difficulty and an imperial judiciary in the future. This implies that a better constitutionalism ultimately needs a better democracy

    μΉœν™”λ„ 기반의 μ „λ ₯ μ ˆμ•½ ν”„λ‘œν† μ½œ

    No full text
    Thesis(master`s)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :전기·컴퓨터 곡학뢀,2005.Maste
    corecore