23 research outputs found
The mechanism for Global Expansion of Internet-enabled Companies : Evidence from korean Internet-enabled Companies
λΉ λ₯Έ κΈλ‘λ²νμ μ§μ λ° κΈ°μ μ§μ½ λ±μ νΉμ§μ λνλ΄λ μΈν°λ· κΈ°μ
μ κΈλ‘λ²νλ νΉμ μμ μμ μ΄λ ν λΆλΆμ μμ©μ μν κ²μ΄λΌκΈ° 보λ€λ κ·Έ κΈ°μ
μ΄ λ³΄μ ν μΈν°λ· κ΄λ ¨ μμμ΄λ μλμμ€, μ΅κ³ κ²½μμΈ΅μ κ΅μ μ κΈ°μ
κ°μ μ , λ³Έκ΅κ³Ό μ§μΆλμκ΅ κ°μ ν경격차μ λν μΈμ λ±μ μμΈλ€μ΄ 볡ν©μ μΌλ‘ μμ©νμ¬ μ΄λ€μ§λ κ³Όμ μ΄λΌ ν μ μλ€. λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μμλ μΈν°λ· κ΄λ ¨μ°μ
μ μ’
μ¬νκ³ μλ 110κ° κΈ°μ
μ νλ³Έμ μ΄μ©νμ¬ μΈν°λ· κΈ°μ
μ κ΅μ ν μ λμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ ν΄μΈνμ₯ λ©μ»€λμ¦μ μ€μ¦μ μΌλ‘ λΆμνμλ€. ν΄μΈνμ₯ λ©μ»€λμ¦μ νμ΅ λ©μ»€λμ¦, μ ν λ©μ»€λμ¦, μ‘°μ λ©μ»€λμ¦μ μΈ λΆλΆμΌλ‘ ꡬμ±λλλ° κΈ°μ
κ΅μ νμ μ νμμλΌ ν μ μλ κ²½μμ μμΈ, νκ²½μμΈ, μμμμΈμ λΆλΆμ νκ³λ₯Ό 극볡νκ³ ν΅ν©μ μΈ μ€λͺ
μ νμ μ μνλλ° κ·Έ μμκ° μλ€κ³ λ³Ό μ μλ€. μμΈλ¬ νλ³Έμ μ μ νκ³λ‘ μΈν΄ μ¬λ‘λΆμμμ€μ λ¨Έλ¬Όλ λ μΈν°λ· κΈ°μ
λ€μ κ΅μ ν νμμ μ€μ¦μ μΌλ‘ μ‘°μ¬ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ νμΈ΅ λ 체κ³μ μΈ λΆμμ κ°λ₯μΌ νλ€. λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Ό, μΈν°λ· κΈ°μ
μ ν΄μΈνμ₯ λ©μ»€λμ¦μ κ΅μ μ κΈ°μ
κ°μ μ , λ³Έκ΅κ³Ό νμ§κ΅κ° ν경격차μ λν μΈμ, μΈν°λ· μλμ 맀κ°νμ¬ μΈν°λ· κΈ°μ
μ κ΅μ νμμ€μ κΈμ μ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€. μ΄μ λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μμλ ν΄μΈνμ₯ λ©μ»€λμ¦μ΄ μΈν°λ· κΈ°μ
μ κ΅μ νμ μ€μν μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μ€μΆμ μΈ λ³μλ‘ λλ¬λ¬λ€
Protagoras Naturalism of Language
λ°μ’
ν μ² νμ λν κΈ°μ‘΄μ μ°κ΅¬μμλ κ·Έμ μ² νμ¬μμλ§ κ΄μ¬μ κ°μ‘μ§ κ·Έλ¬ν μ² νμ¬μμ νμ±κ³Όμ κ³Ό λ°°κ²½μ λν μ°κ΅¬λ λ§μ§ μλ€. λ³Έκ³ μμλ λ°μ’
ν μ² νμ 본격μ μΌλ‘ κ²ν νκΈ° μν κΈ°μ΄ μμ
μΌλ‘μ κ²½μ±μ κ΅λνμ μ
ννκΈ° μ μ νμ±λ μ΄λ€ λ¬Έμ μμμ΄ κ·Έλ₯Ό μ² νν¨μΌλ‘ μ΄λμ΄μ£Όλμ§ μ΄ν΄λ³΄κ³ μ νμλ€. λ°μ’
νμ΄ μ² νν¨μ μΆλ°μ μμ κ³ λ―Όνμλ λ¬Έμ λ μ°λ¦¬μ λ―Όμ‘±μ΄μκ³ κ³ λ―Όμ ν΄κ²°νκ³ μ μ½μλ κ²μ΄ μ΅λ¨μ μ΄ κ°νν μ±
μ΄μλ€. κ·Έλ λ―Όμ‘±μ λ
립μ μνμ¬ μ°λ¦¬ λ―Όμ‘±μ νΉμμ λ°νλ³΄κ³ μ μλνμκ³ λ€μΉ΄μΌλ§ μ΅Έκ·μ μ μλ€μ μ½μΌλ©΄μ μ‘°μ λ―Έμ μ¬μ λν μ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό μμνμλ€. νμ§λ§ κ²°κ΅ νκ³λ₯Ό λλΌκ³ μ€λ¨λμμ§λ§ λ€
μ λμλ€ κΈ°νλ‘μ μ² νμ¬μμ μ νλ©΄μ λ°μ’
νμ μμ λν κ³ λ―Όκ³Ό λ―Έμ κ°μ μ λνμ¬ μ² νμ μΈ κ³ μ°°μ μλνκ² λλλ° κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό μ¬λ―Έμ κ°μ μ΄ μ°μλ₯Ό μ°¨μ§ν΄μΌ λλ€κ³ νλ€. λν λ°μ’
νμ κ΅μ§μ μ’
μ¬νλ©΄μ κ³ΌλκΈ°μ νΌλμ κ²ͺκ³ μλ νμ€μ μ§λ©΄νμ¬ μ ν΅μ μΈ κ΅μ‘μ¬μ μ€μ κ·Όλ³Έμ μ μ μ΄λ¦¬κ³ μ κ³ λ―Όνλ©΄μ ν΄κ³μ κ²½(ζ¬)μ¬μμ μ£Όλͺ©νκ² λμλ€. μ΄λ λ€μΉ΄νμ λ루μ μ‘°μ μ νμ λν μ°κ΅¬μμ μκ·Ήμ λ°μ μ§μμΈλ€μ΄ μ μ°¨ νλ¬Έμ μΈ μ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό μ§ννμλ λΉμμ μλμ β
νλ¬Έμ μν©κ³Ό λ¨μ΄μ Έμλ λ
Όμν μ μλ€.Previous research on the philosophy of Park Jong-hong has focused mainly on his thoughts as a whole, omitting the background and formation of his thoughts. Before delving into the full-fledged philosophy of Park, this article examines the problematiks he had in mind before he entered Keijo Imperial University.
Two starting points of Parks philosophy are us and people of nation; in searching for the answers he extensively read the books published by Choi Nam-sun. Park attempted to uncover the unique characteristics of our people by reading Takayama Chogyus books on the history of Joseon art, with which Park faced limitations. As he turned his attention to the philosophy of Nishida Kitaro, which led him to new philosophical inquiries into life and aesthetic feelings, and
eventually to conclude aesthetic feelings must take the pride of place in life.
As Park was engaged in teaching, the chaotic reality in the turbulent period made him decide to revive the original spirit of traditional thoughts on education, leading him to Toegyes philosophy of Gyong (ζ¬, pious attention). It must be taken into account, however, that in Parks time, elites stimulated Takahashi Torus work on Joseon Confucianism, and began serious academic research on national spirits
A Study of strategic foreign network extension of Japanese firms
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬)--μμΈε€§εΈζ ‘ 倧εΈι’ :ηΆηεΈη§ ηΆηεΈε°ζ»,1995.Docto
νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μμ΄μ "ouk estin antilegein" μΈλͺ μ μλ―Έμ μν
μ¬λ¬ μ² ν μ μΉμ¬κ°λ€μ μ μΉλ€μ ν΅νμ¬ ouk estin antilegeinμ΄λΌλ κ³ λμ μΈλͺ
μ΄ μ ν΄μ§λ€. μ΄ μΈλͺ
μ λ¬Έμμ μΈ μλ―Έ κ·Έλλ‘ νμ΄νμλ©΄ ~μ λ°νλ λ§μ νλ κ²μ΄ κ°λ₯νμ§ μλ€λ λ»μ κ°μ§λ€. νλμ μ ν΅μμλ μ΄λ₯Ό λͺ¨μ λΆκ°λ₯μ±(Impossibility of contradiction)μ΄λΌ μ΄ν΄νλ€. λ€μ λ§ν΄μ μ΄λ€ μ£Όμ΄μ§ μ¬ν νΉμ μ¬κ±΄μ λνμ¬ λμ¬μ§ νλμ λ§(logos)μ λ°νλ λ λ€λ₯Έ λ§μ΄ λ€λ₯Έ λκ΅°κ°μ μ
μ ν΅ν΄ νΉμ μμμ λ§μ ν μμ μ μ
μ ν΅ν΄ λ€μ μ μλλ κ²μ΄ κ°λ₯νμ§ μλ€λ κ²μ μλ―Ένλ€. μ΄ μΈλͺ
μ΄ λꡬλ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μ λλμλμ§ νΉμ λꡬμ μ² νμ μ
μ₯μ νλͺ
νλ κ²μΈμ§μ λν΄μλ νμ¬μ ν΄μκ°λ€ μ¬μ΄μμ μκ²¬μ΄ λΆλΆν μνμ΄λ€. μΌλΆ ν΄μκ°λ€μ μ΄ μΈλͺ
μ΄ μν°μ€ν
λ€μ€λ‘λΆν° μ λλμλ€κ³ ν΄μνλ λ°λ©΄, λ€λ₯Έ ν΄μκ°λ€μ μ΄λ₯Ό νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€λ‘λΆν° κΈ°μΈν κ²μΌλ‘μ¨ ν΄μνλ€. νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μ μλ €μ§ μΈλͺ
μΈ μΈκ°μ²λμ€μ λ°λ₯΄λ©΄, κ°κ°μ μΈκ°μ κ·Έ λꡬλκ° λ€ μμ μκ² μ£Όμ΄μ§ νμμ ν΅ν΄ νμ
ν μ§κ° λ΄μ©μ μ°Έμμ λν μ²λκ° λλ€. μ΄λ€ λ°λμ΄ μν¬λΌν
μ€μκ² μ°¨κ°κ² νμνλ κ²½μ°, μν¬λΌν
μ€λ μμ μκ² λνλ λ°λμ΄ μ°¨λ€λ μ§κ° λ΄μ©μ΄ μ°Έμ΄λΌλ κ²μ μ€μ€λ‘μ μ²λμ μ€κ±°νμ¬ ν보νλ€. λ°λ©΄μ κ·Έ λμΌν λ°λμ΄ λ§μΉ¨ ν
μμ΄ν
ν μ€μκ² λ¨κ²κ² νμνλ κ²½μ°, ν
μμ΄ν
ν μ€ μμ μμ μ μ²λλ‘ μ€κ±° μΌμ (κ·Έ λμΌν) λ°λμ΄ λ¨κ²λ€λ μ§κ° λ΄μ©μ΄ μ°Έμ΄λΌλ κ²μ ν보νλ€. μ΄μ κ°μ΄ μΈκ°μ²λμ€μ λ°λΌ μ΄ν΄ν νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈμλ‘ μ κΈ°λ³Έμ μΌλ‘ κ°κ°μ μΈμ μ£Όμ²΄κ° μμ μ΄ μ§κ°ν μ§κ° λ΄μ©μ λνμ¬ μ°Έμ ν보νλ μλμ£Όμμ μΈ μ±κ²©μ κ²μμ μ°λ¦¬λ νμΈν μ μλ€
Study on Protagorean epistemology : with regard to the part 1 of γTheaetetusγand `On the Gods(peri theon)`
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μ² νκ³Ό μμμ² νμ 곡,2005.Maste
"μ λ€μ λνμ¬(peri theon)"λ₯Ό ν΅ν νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈμλ‘ μ°κ΅¬
μΈμμ λ¬Έμ λ₯Ό λ€λ£¨λ λννΈμΈ γν
μμ΄ν
ν μ€γνΈμμ, μν¬λΌν
μ€μ λν μλμμΈ ν
μμ΄ν
ν μ€λ μΈμμ μ§κ°λΌλ μ μλ₯Ό μ μνλ€. νμ§λ§ μν¬λΌν
μ€λ ν
μμ΄ν
ν μ€μ μ΄μ κ°μ μ μλ₯Ό νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈμλ‘ μ μ
μ₯μ΄λΌκ³ κ·μ νλ€. μ΄μ κ°μ κ·μ μ΄ν, νλΌν€μ νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈμλ‘ μ ν΄μν λ€, λΉνμ μΌλ‘ ν΄μ²΄νλ μμ
μ μ΄λ£¬λ€. κ·Έμ ν΄μ μμ
μ νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈκ°μ²λμ€(homo mensura these) μ¦ μΈκ°μ λͺ¨λ κ²μ μ²λ(metron)μΈλ°, μλ(-μΈ) κ²λ€μ λν΄μ μλ€(-μ΄λ€)κ³ , κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μμ§(-μ΄μ§)μμ κ²λ€μ λν΄μ μμ§(-μ΄μ§) μλ€κ³ νλ λ°μ μ²λμ΄λ€μ λν κ³ μ°°μ ν λλ‘ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ§λλ°, κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈμλ‘ μ μ¬μ μΈμλ‘ μ μ
μ₯μμ λμμ μ‘΄μ¬μ±(tou ontou: of being)κ³Ό 무μ€λ₯μ± (apseudes: non-fallacy)μ ν보νλ©°, μ§κ°(perception)μ μ
κ°ν μλμ£Όμ μΈμλ‘ μΌλ‘ κ·κ²°λλ€. κ·Έλ°λ° μ΄λ ν μΈμλ‘ μ΄ μ΄μ κ°μ μ
μ₯μ κ°μ§λ€λ κ²μ λ κ°μ§ λ¬Έμ μ μ κ°μ§κ² λλ€. μ°μ μ²«μ§Έλ‘ λ¬Έμ κ° λλ μ μ λμΌν μΈμ μ£Όμ²΄κ° λμΌν λμμ λνμ¬ μλ°λλ νΉμ κ°κΈ° λ€λ₯Έ μ§κ° λ΄μ©μ κ°μ§κ² λλ κ²½μ°κ° λ°μν μ μλ€λ κ²κ³Ό, λμ§Έλ‘ μ μλλ λ¬Έμ λ μ§κ°μ΄ κ·Έ λμμΌλ‘ κ°μ§λ κ²μ μΈλΆ λμμΌλ‘λΆν° μ μΆλλ μ§κ° λ΄μ©μ΄μ§, κ·Έ μΈλΆ λμ μμ²΄κ° μλλΌλ μ μ΄λ€. λ°λΌμ μ΄μ²λΌ μ μλλ λ¬Έμ μ λ€μ 극볡νκΈ° μνμ¬, νλΌν€μ ν€λΌν΄λ μ΄ν μ€μ λ§λ¬Όμ μ μ€(flux theory), μ¦ μ΄λ ν κ²λ κ²°μ½ μλ(-μΈ) κ²μ΄ μλκ³ , μΈμ λ μμ±λκ³ μλ€λ₯Ό νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈμλ‘ μ λν μ‘΄μ¬λ‘ μ κΈ°λ°μΌλ‘ λμ
νλλ°, κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό μμ΄λ¬λνκ²λ νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈμλ‘ μ λ€μ μΈ κ°μ§μ λ¬Έμ μ μ ν΅ν΄ κ°κ°(sensation)μ μ
κ°ν κ·Ήλ¨μ μλμ£Όμλ‘ μ λ½νκ² λλ©°, λ§μΉ¨λ΄ μ²μ μΆ©μ‘±λμλ€κ³ μ¬κ²¨μ‘λ λμμ μ‘΄μ¬μ± λ° λ¬΄μ€λ₯μ±μ‘°μ°¨ μΆ©μ‘±μν€μ§ λͺ»ν μ± μμ ν ν΄μ²΄λκ³ λ§λ€
Aristotles Reading of the Man-Measure Doctrine : Infallibilism and Relativism
λͺ¨μμ¨μ μλ¦¬λ€ μ€ κ°μ₯ νμ€ν μλ¦¬λ‘ κ·μ νλ 4κΆμμ, μ리μ€ν ν
λ μ€λ κ·Έ μ리λ₯Ό μλ°°νλ μλ€μ μ μ ν λ°©μμΌλ‘ μΉμ ν΄μΌ νλ€κ³ κ°μ‘°νλ€. μ리μ€ν ν
λ μ€λ λͺ¨μμ¨μ μλ°°νλ μλ€μ μ§μ νΌλμΌλ‘ μΈν΄ μΌκΈ°λ μμ λ€μ 무μ§λ‘ μΈν΄ κ·Έμ κ°μ κ³Όμ€μ μ μ§λ₯΄λ©° μ€μ€λ‘λ₯Ό λ
Όλ°νλλ° μ΄λ₯Έλ€κ³ μ§μ νλ©°, κ·Έλ€μ μΉμ νκΈ° μν΄ μ§λ¦¬μ λν μ€λμ μ²λ°©νλ€. λ°λ©΄ λͺ¨μμ¨μ μλ°°νλ μλ€μ΄ λ
Όμμμ μ΄κΈ°κΈ° μν΄ μμ λ€μ λ
Όλ³μ νμ μ΄κ΅¬λ₯Ό λλ°νμ¬ μμ ν μ μλλ°, μ΄ κ²½μ° κ·Έλ€μ λ μ΄μ λͺ¨μμ¨μ μλ°°νμ§λ μ€μ€λ‘λ₯Ό λ
Όλ°νμ§λ μκΈ°μ, μ리μ€ν ν
λ μ€λ μ΄λ¬ν μλ€μ μΉμ νκΈ° μν΄ κ·Έλ€ λ
Όμλ³΄λ€ λμ± κ°ν λ
Όλ³μ νμ μ²λ°©νλ€. μ΄μμ λ
Όμλ₯Ό μ§ννλ κ°μ΄λ°, μ리μ€ν ν
λ μ€λ λͺ¨μμ¨μ μλ°°νλ ν μ¬λ‘λ‘ νλ‘νκ³ λΌμ€μ μΈκ°μ²λμ€ λ¨νΈμ μ μνλ©° μ΄μ λν λ
Όμλ₯Ό λΉνμ μΌλ‘ μ΄λ£¬λ€.In Book 4 of Metaphysics where Aristotle argues for the Principle of Non-Contradiction as the most secure principle, he emphasizes that the violators of the principle must be cured. According to Aristotle, they violate the principle due to their ignorance caused by intellectual perplexity. To cure them, Aristotle therefore prescribes persuasion (peithΕ) about the truth. When the violators equip their arguments with proper modifiers or qualifiers, however, they no longer violate the Principle of Non-Contradiction. In this case, the (argumentative) power (bia) is required for their cure, prescribes Aristotle. In such treatment, Aristotle introduces Protagoras Man-Measure Doctrine as a case of violation of the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Reading the doctrine as a claim that human cognition is completed and guaranteed only through perception, Aristotle interprets it as an infallibilism theory (every belief is true (about x to be F and ~F) simpliciter) and argues that it hence violates the principle (Books 4 and 5). He prescribes persuasion about the truth for the cure of the doctrine
Determinant of the performance in Global Air Carriers' International Lines: An Integrated Approach at the Firm land Business Level
This study is carried out to suggest practical implications to the airlines' international business by empirically analyzing the factors affecting the performance in international lines of global air carriers. The existing studies seem to be lacking in the integrated study considering the firm level and business units level as to drawing the factors affecting the performance of international airlines. Writers propose an integrated logic including discussions on the level of the firm and business units, and suggests to make a model considering the structural features of international lines. Analysis of this study shows that firms variables have a more crucial influence on the performance of the global air carriers international lines than business units variables