22 research outputs found

    ์• ๊ธฐ์žฅ๋Œ€ ureidoglycine aminohydrolase์™€ ureidoglycolate amidohydrolase์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์ƒ๋ช…๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2014. 8. ์ด์ƒ๊ธฐ.In plants, the ureide pathway is a metabolic route that converts the ring nitrogen atoms of purine to ammonia via sequential enzymatic reactions, playing an important role in nitrogen recovery. By using x-ray crystallography, crystal structures of two enzymes in this pathway were solved in this study: (S)-ureidoglycine aminohydrolase (UGlyAH) and the (S)-ureidoglycolate amidohydroalse (UAH), both from Arabidopsis thaliana. UGlyAH enzyme converts (S)-ureidoglycine into (S)-ureidoglycolate and ammonia, providing the final substrate to the pathway. Here, a structural and functional analysis of this enzyme from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtUGlyAH) is reported. The crystal structure of AtUGlyAH in the ligand-free form shows a monomer structure in the bi-cupin fold of the ฮฒ-barrel and an octameric functional unit, as well as an Mn2+ ion binding site. The structure of AtUGlyAH in complex with (S)-ureidoglycine revealed that the Mn2+ ion acts as a molecular anchor to bind (S)-ureidoglycine and its binding mode dictates the enantioselectivity of the reaction. Further kinetic analysis characterized the functional roles of the active site residues, including the Mn2+ ion binding site and residues in the vicinity of (S)-ureidoglycine. These analyses provide molecular insights into the structure of the enzyme and its possible catalytic mechanism. In the final step of the pathway, UAH catalyzes the conversion of (S)-ureidoglycolate into glyoxylate and releases two molecules of ammonia as by-products. UAH is homologous in structure and sequence with allantoate amidohydrolase (AAH), an upstream enzyme in the pathway with a similar function as that of an amidase but with a different substrate. Both enzymes exhibit strict substrate specificity and catalyze reactions in a concerted manner, resulting in purine degradation. Here, three crystal structures of Arabidopsis thaliana UAH: bound with substrate, reaction intermediate, and product, and a structure of Escherichia coli AAH complexed with allantoate are reported. Structural analyses of UAH revealed a distinct binding mode for each ligand in a bimetal reaction center with the active site in a closed conformation. The ligand directly participates in the coordination shell of two metal ions and is stabilized by the surrounding residues. In contrast, AAH, which exhibits a substrate-binding site similar to that of UAH, requires a larger active site due to the additional ureido group in allantoate. Structural analyses and mutagenesis revealed that both enzymes undergo an open-to-close conformational transition in response to ligand binding, and that the active site size as well as the interaction environments in each UAH and AAH are determinants for substrate specificity between two structurally homologous enzymes.ABSTRACT I CONTENTS III LIST OF FIGURES VI LIST OF TABLES VIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IX CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II. Structural and Functional Insights into (S)-Ureidoglycine Aminohydrolase, Key Enzyme of Purine Catabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana 8 MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Construct 9 2. Protein Expression, Purification and Crystallization 11 3. Data Collection and Structure Determination 14 4. Enzyme Assay 20 5. Metal Analysis 24 RESULTS 1. Molecular Architecture of Octameric AtUGlyAH in a Ligand-Free Form 25 2. Interactions between Monomers in the Intra- and Inter-layers 31 3. Active Site in the Ligand-Free Form of AtUGlyAH 35 4. Binding Mode of (S)-Ureidoglycine in the Binary Complex 42 5. Functional Analysis 48 DISCUSSION 53 CHAPTER III. Structural and Functional Insights into the Substrate Specificity of (S)-Ureidoglycolate Amidohydrolase from Arabidopsis thaliana and Its Comparison with Allantoate Amidohydrolase 58 MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Construct 59 2. Protein Expression and Purification 61 3. Crystallization 62 4. Data Collection and Structure Determination 66 5. Enzyme Assay 71 RESULTS 1. Overall Structure of AtUAH 72 2. Active Site with a Bimetal Center 78 3. Binding Mode of (S)-Ureidoglycolate in a Binary Complex with AtUAH(E183A) 81 4. Binding Mode of the Intermediate and Product in the Binary Complex with AtUAH 85 5. Binding Mode of Allantoate in the Closed Conformation of the EcAAH Binary Complex 89 6. Functional Analyses 93 DISCUSSION 96 CHAPTER IV. CONCLUSIONS 103 REFERENCES 105 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 113 CURRICULUM VITAE 116 PUBLICATIONS 117 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IN KOREAN118Docto

    ํ•œ๊ตญ ์ •๋ถ€์—์„œ ์ œ๋„ํ™”๋œ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผํ‘œ(BSC)์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ : ํ–‰์ •์ž์น˜๋ถ€์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ํ–‰์ •๋Œ€ํ•™์› :ํ–‰์ •ํ•™๊ณผ, ํ–‰์ •ํ•™์ „๊ณต,2006.Maste

    SUH์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ

    No full text
    Thesis(master`s)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๋†์ƒ๋ช…๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2005.Maste

    Effect of the Nuclear Factor I-C on the formation of Hertwig's epithelial root sheath during root development

    No full text
    ์น˜์•„์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์€ ์ƒํ”ผ-๊ฐ„์—ฝ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๊ณผ์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ์น˜๊ด€์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐ ๊ทธ๋“ค์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ „๋‹ฌ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค์ˆ˜ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”์ง€๋งŒ ์น˜๊ทผ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ „์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ณ„๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๊ฒƒ์ด ์—†๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์— NFI-C knock out ์ƒ์ฅ์—์„œ ์ •์ƒ์น˜๊ด€์— ๋น„์ •์ƒ์ ์ธ ์น˜๊ทผ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์น˜์•„๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ NFI-C๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์น˜๊ทผ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์ƒ์•„๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋ถ„ํ™”์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. NFI-C knock out ์ƒ์ฅ์˜ ์น˜๊ทผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋™์•ˆ์— HERS์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ ์ž cytokeratin ๋ฉด์—ญ์กฐ์งํ™”ํ•™์ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์น˜๊ทผ์ƒ์•„์งˆ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด DSPP mRNA in-situ hybrydization๋ฒ•์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 1. NFI-C knock out ์ƒ์ฅ์˜ ์น˜๊ทผํ˜•์„ฑ์‹œ HERS์˜ ์—ญํ•  Wild type๊ณผ knock out type ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ cytokeratin์€ ๋ชจ๋“  HERS ์„ธํฌ๋“ค๊ณผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , HERS์™€ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘์ƒํ”ผ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์–‘์„ฑ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ธํฌ๋“ค์˜ ์—ฐ์†์„ฑ์€ ์น˜๊ฒฝ๋ถ€ ๋ถ€์œ„์—์„œ ์†Œ์‹ค๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. Knock out type์—์„œ ์น˜๊ทผ์ƒ์•„์งˆ์ด ์นจ์ฐฉ๋œ ํ›„, cytokeratin ์–‘์„ฑ-HERS ์„ธํฌ๋“ค์€ ์น˜๊ฒฝ๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋ถˆ๊ทœ์น™ํ•œ ๋ฐฐ์—ด๊ณผ ๊ทน์„ฑ์˜ ์ƒ์‹ค์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 2. NFI-C knock out ์ƒ์ฅ์˜ ์น˜๊ทผ์ƒ์•„์งˆ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ DSPP mRNA์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์€ wild type์—์„œ ์น˜๊ด€๊ณผ ์น˜๊ทผ์ƒ์•„์งˆ์˜ ์ƒ์•„๋ชจ์„ธํฌ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ๋ณด์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, knock out type์—์„œ๋Š” ์น˜๊ด€๋ถ€์œ„ ์ƒ์•„์งˆ์˜ ์ƒ์•„๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ๋งŒ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. 3. NFI-C knock out ์ƒ์ฅ์˜ ์น˜๊ทผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ HERS๋Š” ์น˜๊ด€์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ •์ƒ์ ์ธ ํ™•์žฅ์„ ๋ณด์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์น˜๊ทผ๋ถ€์œ„์—์„œ์˜ ์ƒ์•„ ๋ชจ์„ธํฌ ๋ถ„ํ™”๋Š” ์‹คํŒจํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค๋กœ ๋ณด์•„ NFI-C๋Š” ์น˜๊ทผํ˜•์„ฑ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ƒ์•„๋ชจ์„ธํฌ ๋ถ„ํ™”์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ๋œ๋‹ค. Tooth formation is a complex developmental process that is mediated through a series of reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Several signal pathways and transcription factors have been implicated in regulating molar crown development, but relatively little is known about the regulation of root development. It was reported that NFI-C knockout mice showed abnormal root formation with normal crown. The aims of this study are to elucidate how the NFI-C regulate the determine of root shape and odontoblasts differentiation. We carried out immunohistochemistry using cytokeratin to investigate the role of Hertwig's epithelial root sheath and DSPP mRNA in-situ hybridization to conform the nature of root dentin during root development in NFI-C knockout mice. Cytokeratin reacted with all the HERS cells and the continuity of cytokeratin positive cells between the HERS cells and enamel epithelium was lost in the cervical region both wild and K/O types. After root dentin deposition cytokeratin positive-HERS cells showed irregularity and loss of polarity in the cervical region in K/O type. DSPP mRNA was strongly expressed in odontoblasts of crown and root dentin in wild type mice, whereas expression of DSPP mRNA was restricted in odontoblast of crown dentin in the K/O type. During root formation in NFI-C knockout mice, HERS normally grow out of the crown but fail to induce odontoblast differentiation in root portion. These results suggest that NFI-C may play important roles in odontoblast differentiation during root dentin formation.์œ„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์กฐ์„ ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋…„์ œ ํ•ด์™ธํŒŒ๊ฒฌ(2001๋…„) ์ง€์›์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ๊ฒƒ์ž„

    EXPRESSION OF OD314 DURING AMELOBLAST DIFFERENTIATION AND MATURATION

    No full text
    ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ๋Š” ๋ฒ•๋ž‘์งˆ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธํฌ๋กœ, ๋ฒ•๋ž‘์งˆ์˜ ์œ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ์งˆ์„ ๋ถ„๋น„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฒ•๋ž‘์งˆ ์„ํšŒํ™” ๊ณผ์ •์—๋„ ๊ด€์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์น˜์•„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋ถ„ํ™”๋Š” ์ˆœ์ฐจ์ ์ธ ์ƒํ”ผ-๊ฐ„์—ฝ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜๋‚˜, ๋ถ„ํ™”๋‚˜ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ „์€ ์•„์ง๊นŒ์ง€ ์ž˜ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ์ƒ์•„๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ์ฒ˜์Œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋œ OD314๊ฐ€ ์น˜์•„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ƒ์•„์งˆ์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ์•„๋ชจ์„ธํฌ ๋ฟ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์—๋„ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์ฅ ํ•˜์•… ์ „์น˜์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ํ˜•ํƒœํ•™์  ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ in-situ hybridization์— ์˜ํ•œ OD314 mRNA์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  OD314 ํ•ญ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฉด์—ญ์กฐ์งํ™”ํ•™์  ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ OD314์œ ์ „์ž์˜ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ ๋ถ„ํ™”์™€ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ์˜ ์—ญํ• ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. ํ˜•ํƒœํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ๋Š” ๋ถ„ํ™” ๋‹จ๊ณ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถ„๋น„ ์ „๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ, ๋ถ„๋น„๊ธฐ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ, ์„ฑ์ˆ™๊ธฐ์˜ ํ‰ํƒ„๋ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์™€ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฃผ๋ฆ„๋ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2. OD314 mRNA๋Š” ๋ถ„๋น„๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ๊ฐ€ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ํ•ด๊ฐˆ ์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ทธ ๋ฐœํ˜„์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3. OD314 ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์€ ๋ถ„๋น„ ์ „๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ , ๋ถ„๋น„๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธํฌ์งˆ์— ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์„ฑ์ˆ™๊ธฐ์˜ ํ‰ํƒ„๋ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์™€ ์ฃผ๋ฆ„๋ ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๊ทผ์‹ฌ๊ณผ ์›์‹ฌ๋๋‹จ์— OD314 ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์ด ๊ฐ•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ OD314๋Š” ๋ฒ•๋ž‘๋ชจ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋ถ„ํ™”์™€ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์„ธํฌ์งˆ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์—์„œ ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ๋œ๋‹ค. Ameloblasts are responsible for the formation and maintenance of enamel which is an epithelially derived protective covering for teeth. Ameloblast differentiation is controlled by sequential epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. However, little is known about the differentiation and maturation mechanisms. OD314 was firstly identified from odontoblasts by subtraction between odontoblast/pulp cells and osteoblast/dental papilla cells, even though OD314 protein was also expressed in ameloblast during tooth formation. In this study, to better understand the biological function of OD314 during amelogenesis, we examined expression of the OD314 mRNA and protein in various stages of ameloblast differentiation using in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. The results were as follows : 1. The ameloblast showed 4 main morphological and functional stages referred to as the presecretory, secretory, smooth-ended, and ruffle-ended. 2. OD314 mRNA was expressed in secretory ameloblast and increased according to the maturation of the cells. 3. OD314 protein was not expressed in presecretory ameloblast but expressed in secretory ameloblast and maturative ameloblast. OD314 protein was distributed in entire cytoplasm of secretory ameloblast. However, OD314 was localized at the proxiamal and distal portion of the cytoplasm of smooth-ended and ruffle-ended ameloblast. These results suggest that OD314 may play important roles in the ameloblast differentiation and maturation.ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ณผํ•™์žฌ๋‹จ ๋ชฉ์ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์—ฐ
    corecore