42 research outputs found

    ๋Œ€ํ–ฅ๋ถ„์ถœํ™”์—ผ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ™”ํ•™ ๋ฐ˜์‘๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ์†Œ์—ผํ•œ๊ณ„์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2002.Maste

    An appraisal of the sequential coherence between primary-secondary curriculum : A study on the organization and presentation of content knowledge in the primary science curriculum

    No full text
    ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ดˆโ€ค์ค‘๋“ฑ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ • ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๊ณ„์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋“ฑ ๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๊ต์œก๋‚ด์šฉ์ด ์ œ์‹œ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ธฐ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ดˆโ€ค์ค‘๋“ฑ ํ•™๊ต๊ธ‰๊ฐ„ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ •์ƒ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ณ„์„ฑ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๊ดด๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋น„๊ต์  ๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ดด๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ด์œ ๋ฅผ ๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋…ผ๋ฆฌ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณผํ•™๊ต๊ณผ ์ง€์‹์˜ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ด€์ ์—๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฑฐ์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ฐพ์•„๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์ด ๊ต์œก๊ณผ์ • ๋ฌธ์„œ๋‚˜ ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ์—์„œ ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ต์œก๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์— ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. At the time of transfer from primary to secondary schooling, many students experience difficulties because of extreme differences in curriculum between the two sectors. With pursuing such interest, this study investigates the sequential coherence between primary and secondary curriculum. This study focuses on different forms of curriculum organization in science curriculum. This study examines such different forms in three level, curriculum document, textbook and classroom lesson of curriculum organization and presentation of subject contents. First, it is discussed that curriculum developers in science education tend to use rhetoric dichotomy to organize curricular contents, which is activity-based contents and conceptual knowledge in the subject matter. These two criteria have undoubtedly been legitimated to make cohesively sequential the organization of primary-secondary science curriculum. This study discusses that such a dichotomy reflects a partial viewpoint of the respective subject knowledge, and moreover it disrupts the sequential order for transfer between the two sectors. Second, this study identifies, in primary science curriculum materials and textbooks, such a dichotomy in the way of how those materials present subject contents. Implications about different ways of organizing primary science curriculum with an integrated form of the curricular knowledge are reformulated

    ๋ธŒ๋ฃจ๋„ˆ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•™์Šต์˜ ๋น„ํŒ์  ์žฌ๊ฒ€ํ†  : `์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด` ๊ณผํ•™์ฒ ํ•™์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธๅคงๅญธๆ ก ๅคงๅญธ้™ข :ๆ•Ž่‚ฒๅญธ็ง‘ ๆ•Ž่‚ฒๅญธๅฐˆๆ”ป,1995.Maste

    Exploring the 21st Century Key Competencies and Geography Curriculum

    No full text
    corecore