33 research outputs found
Asymmetrical Inter-Korean Relation, Changes in Unification Attitude and New Approach For Social Security
μ΄ κΈμ νλμ κ³Ό μΈκ³νλ‘ μΈν λ¨λΆκ΄κ³μ μ§μ μ νκ³Ό λΆμμ μ±μ μ¬
νλ‘ μΈν΄ ν₯ν νλ°λμ μ§μμ ν° λ³νκ° μ΄λλ μ νκΈ°μ κ΅λ©΄μ΄ λ€κ°μ€κ³ μλ€λ μ μ νμ, μ΄μ λμ²νκΈ° μν΄ μ΄λ€ λμμ΄ νμν μ§λ₯Ό νΉν 볡ν©μ μ¬νμ보μ μ°¨μμμ κ²ν ν κ²μ΄λ€. ν¬κ² μΈ κ°μ§ μΈ‘λ©΄μ΄ λ€λ£¨μ΄μ§κ³ μλ€. 첫째λ λμ κΈ°μ λ¨λΆκ΄κ³κ° μ£Όλ‘ μ λμ κ· νμ κΈ°μ΄ν κ²μ΄μλλ° λΉν΄ νμ¬λ μ¬λ¬ μΈ‘λ©΄μμ λΉλμΉμ λ¨λΆκ΄κ³κ° μ¬νλκ³ μλ€λ μ , λ κ·Έλ‘ μΈν λΆμμ μ±κ³Ό λΆκ· νμ±μ΄ 컀μ§κ³ μλ€λ μ μ κ°μ‘°νλ€. λμ§Έλ‘λ μ΄λ° νμ€μ λ°μμΌλ‘μ κ΅λ―Όλ€μ ν΅μΌμ λν μμμ μλ―Έμλ λ³νκ° λνλκ³
μλ λ°, νΉν λΆνμ λν μλ©΄μ μ΄λ©΄μλ νμ€μ£Όμμ μΈ νλκ° μΌκ΄λκ² νμΈλκ³ μμμ μ£Όλͺ©νκ³ μλ€. λ§μ§λ§μΌλ‘λ μ΄λ° μν©μ κ³ λ €ν λ νκ΅
μμμ μ보κ°λ
μ μ ν΅μ μΈ μλ―Έμμμ λλΆκ²½κ³ λ΄μ§ λΆλ¨κ΄λ¦¬ μ°¨μμ λμ΄μ ννλ₯Ό μν μ보, ν΅μΌμ ν₯ν μ보, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ λ³΅ν©μ μ¬νμ보μ μ°¨μλ€
μ ν¬μ©ν΄μΌ ν κ²μμ κ°μ‘°νκ³ μλ€.This paper aims at exploring the changes in inter-Korean relation from the
perspectives of instability and transformation. The paper argues that forthcoming
decades will be a critical period during which very important socio-political changes
for deciding future order in the Korean peninsula can be made. To prepare the
system capacity which could help peace and unification in the Korean peninsula,
three points deserves consideration; first, the contemporary inter-Korean relation
is changing from a symmetrical confrontation to an asymmetrical regime which
is characterized by the diverse differences and gaps between South and North
Korea; second, ordinary citizens attitude on North Korea and unification issues
is changing from monolistic-nationalistic one to diverse-multicultural one; finally
the idea of national security needs to change from the conventional one to a more comprehensive approach for peace, unification, and complex social security
The InterβKorean Relationship and the Concept of the Asymmetrical Divided State System
This paper aims at conceptualizing contemporary inter-Korean relations by
focusing on the idea of a special relationship constituted temporarily in the
process of unification which was expressed in the 1992 Agreement on
Reconciliation, Non-aggression, and Exchanges and Cooperation Between
South and North Korea (The Basic Agreement).
The idea was designed to accommodate the contradictory conditions that
exist between the two Koreas β two different political communities with
hostile ideologies and institutions β while they try to achieve unification.
The definition of special relationship constituted temporarily in the process
of unification has been used as a basic principle to manage inter-Korean
relations during the last decade. It has allowed the political flexibility which
was necessary to find a contact point somewhere between the hostile
conditions and nationalistic hope. Thus, understanding the contradictions
between political community and cultural nationality is very important in
theory as well as in practice. This paper, however argues that a social
dimension needs to be added in explaining the special requirements of
inter-Korean relations. Aside from the political and national realms, the
social realm consisting of the diverse activities of voluntary associations,
such as NGOs and corporations, should be considered. Over the last decade the social dimension has developed sufficiently to constitute a special
relationship that can exist separately from the political bargaining and
national homogeneity.
To understand the complex relations between South and North Korea,
this paper suggests the concept of the asymmetrical divided-state system.
The idea of a divided state can explain the contradictory conditions that
exist within the temporary states of the two Koreas. The word system is
needed to explain the international context in which multilateral influences
are exerted upon the two Koreas under the current armistice regime. Finally,
the world asymmetrical conceptualizes the difference and diversity between
the two Koreas social aspects like economy and civil participation. In
summary, the new concept of the asymmetrical divided-state system is a
useful construct to capture the complex and specific nature of inter-Korean
relations
Phenomena and Images - the Measurement and Analysis of North Korean Images
μ΄ μ°κ΅¬λ νκ΅μΈμ λλΆνλλ μ μ±
μ§ν₯, κ·Έλ‘ μΈν λ¨λ¨κ°λ±μ΄ μ΄λ μ λ λΆνμ λ
ν μ§λ¨μ μ΄λ―Έμ§λ‘ μ€λͺ
ν μ μλμ§λ₯Ό κ²½νμ μΌλ‘ κ²μ¦ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μ΄λ―Έμ§μ μν₯λ ₯μ μ΄
λ‘ μ μΌλ‘ μ€λͺ
νκ³ λ¨λ¨κ°λ±μ ν΄μμ κΈ°μ¬ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ λ¨λΆκ΄κ³μ μ§μ μ νλ¬Έμ μΌλ‘ κΈ°
μ¬νκ³ μ νλ κ²μ λͺ©μ μΌλ‘ νλ€. λ³Όλ©μ μ΄λ―Έμ§λ₯Ό μ£Όκ΄μ μΈ μ§μ(subjective knowledge)
μΌλ‘ μ μνλ€(Boulding 1956, 5~6). μ΄ μ£Όκ΄μ μΈ μ§μμΌλ‘μμ μ΄λ―Έμ§λ κ³Όκ±° κ²½νμ
κ²°κ³Όλ‘ νμ±λκ³ κ΅¬μ±λμ§λ§, κ²°μ½ κ³ μ μ μ΄κ±°λ νꡬ λΆλ³νλ κ²μ μλλ€. λ³Όλ©μ μ€
νλ € μ΄λ―Έμ§κ° μ¬νκ° λμμμ΄ μνΈμμ©νλ©° μλ‘μκ² μν₯μ μ£Όλ κ²μΌλ‘ 보μλ€. μ¦,
μ΄λ―Έμ§κ° μ¬νλ₯Ό λ§λ€λΏλ§ μλλΌ, μ¬νλ κ³μ μ΄λ―Έμ§λ₯Ό μ¬μμ°νλ€(Boulding 1956,
64). μ΄λ¬ν λ³Όλ©μ λ
Όμλ₯Ό κ³μΉν νλ¨Όμ μ΄λ―Έμ§ μ΄λ‘ (image theory)μ 본격μ μΌλ‘ μ΄
λ―Έμ§λ₯Ό λΆλ₯νκ³ μ λμ μΌλ‘ μΈ‘μ νλ €κ³ μλνλ€. λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μμλ νκ΅ μ±μΈλ¨λ
823λͺ
μ λν μΌλμΌ λ©΄μ μ‘°μ¬ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λ°νμΌλ‘, λΆνμ λν΄ νκ΅μΈλ€μ΄ κ°κ³ μλ μ΄λ―Έμ§λ€
μ μ νννκ³ κ·Έ κ°κ°μ νΉμ§μ μ 리νμλ€.This study aims to empirically analyze how South Koreans attitude toward North Korea or North Korean policy orientation, and the South-South conflicts could be influenced by North Korean Images. Boulding defines images as subjective Knowledge (1956, 5~6). Images as subjective knowledge are formed and constructed through past experiences. but that does not mean that images are unchangeable. Rather, Boulding states that images and society influence each other in continuous interactions. Hermann, who inherits Bouldings image theory, tries to categorize international Image by quantitatively measuring them. Based on Hermanns image theory, this study analyzes various types of North Korean images on South Korean citizens mind
Collective Memory and Symbolization of the Past : Cultural Meaning of the Nam-San in Modern Korea
μ΄ μ°κ΅¬λ νΉμ ν μ¬κ±΄μ΄λ 곡κ°μ λν μ¬νμ κΈ°λ
νμλ₯Ό κ³Όκ±° μμ¬μ λν μ§ν©μ ν΄μμ μΌνμΌλ‘ νμ
ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ λ¬Ένμ μΈ νμ μμ λνλλ κΈ°μ΅μ ꡬμ±μ±μ λλ¬λ΄κ³ μ νλ€. κ³Όκ±°λ₯Ό μ¬κ΅¬μ±νκ³ νμ¬ μμ 보쑴νλ λ°©μμ μΌνμΌλ‘ μμ¬μμ κ³Ό ν¨κ» μ¬νμ κΈ°λ
νμκ° μ£Όλͺ©λκ³ μλ€. νΉν κ·Όλκ΅κ°μ μ립과μ μμ μ§ν©μ μ 체μ±μ ν립, μ μΉμ μ λΉμ±μ νμ±κ³Ό κ΄λ ¨νμ¬ κ³Όκ±°μ λν ν΄μμ μ€μμ±μ΄ κ°λλμκ³ μ¬νμ κΈ°λ
νμμ μ μΉμ μν λ λ§€μ° κ°μ‘°λμλ€. μ΄ κΈμ λ¨μ°μ΄λΌλ 곡κ°μ λΆμ¬λμλ μ μΉμ μμ§μ±μ΄ μκΈ°μ μΌλ‘ λ³λͺ¨ν΄μ¨ κ³Όμ μ κ²ν ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ νκ΅μ κ·Όνλμ¬μ κΈ°μ΅μ μ¬νμ ꡬμ±μ μ°κ²°μμΌ λ³΄λ €λ μμ
μ΄λ€. μ΄ κΈμ μ μΉμ μμ§μ±μ μ§λ 곡κ°μ΄λ κΈ°λ
λ¬Όλ€μ λν λΆμμ ν΅ν΄ μμ¬μ λ³νμ μλ―Έλ₯Ό μλ‘κ² κ²ν ν μ μλ κ°λ₯μ±μ 보μ¬μ£Όμλ€. λν κ³Όκ±°μ μμ§ν μμ
μ΄ μΌλ§λ κΆλ ₯κ΄κ³μ μν΄ μ’μ°λ μ μλ κ²μΈμ§, λμκ° ν΄λ°© ν νμλ―Όν κ³Όμ μ΄ μΌλ§λ λΆμ² μ νκ², μ§λ°°λ
Όλ¦¬μ λ°κ³΅μ΄λ°μ¬λ‘κΈ°μ μν΄ μν₯μ μ
μλμ§λ₯Ό 보μ¬μ€λ€.
This study of political symbolization of Nam-san tries to show relationship between social remembrance and collective memory in modern Korea. Declaring independence of Daehan Empire, Chosun dynasty came to know importance of political symbolization to enhance collective identity of the people. Some new memorial sites were elected near Namsan, where quasi-religious rituals of Chosun Dynasty had been done for a long time. Especially Changchungdan was designed to remember those who had dedicated their lives for the country during Tonghak Peasant War in 1894 and Assassination of King's wife by Japanese military in 1895. Its political function seemed to be similar to that of the National Cemetery in a modern state. With colonization, however, Namsan changed as a symbolic site for Japanese Empire. It became an imperial place where Japanese residence, colonial institutions and Shinto shrine were combined together to show the strength of Japanese colonialism. After liberation in 1941, the political symbol of Namsan changed once again. A plan of building a monument for national liberation at the site of demolished Shinto shrine was prepared by several political leaders. However, the political division between left and right and social turmoil hindered a well-designed reconstitution of cultural symbol of Namsan. Also with the emergence of division states in South and North, authoritarianism and anti-communism were strongly combined with the space of Namsan. Namsan, as a site of social memory, shows the difficulty of decolonization and the complexity of state-building process in modern Korea
Properties of outward K current and its redox modulation in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells of the rabbit
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μνκ³Ό μ리νμ 곡,1996.Docto
νκ΅ λ΄μ λ λ΄λ‘ μ μ미ꡬ쑰μ μ μΉμ μ§ν₯
This paper aims to explain the complex meaning of "the national" in contemporary South Korea. The main argument is that the national discourse in Korea is so complex that "the national" should be differentiated into three concepts; kukmin, minjok and hankukin, Kukmin is used to identify the Republic of Korea as a nation (for example national income is usually expressed as "kukmin income"). Minjok is used to express both South and North Korea as a historically and culturally homogeneous community (for example "national unification" is said as "minjok unification"). Finally hankukin is used to mention ethnic Koreans without relation to any specific political community.
Three factors are examined for the differentiation of "the national" : development of the stateness in South Korea, cultural nationalism and globalization. Due to the strenthening of the stateness since democratization and industrializaion, the kukmin identity is growing rapidly in recent Korea. At the same time, there is still a strong sense of commonness between South and North Korea based on the minjok identity. Finally globalization brings about multi-ethnic and multi-national phenomena in Korea, which makes Koreans sensitive to the ethnic identity. In conclusion, "the national" needs to be explained contextually in order to understand its historical specificity