5 research outputs found
Predictors of Quality of Life among Grandparents Raising Their Grandchildren: An Ecological Approach
Purpose : The purpose of this study is to examine factors affecting quality of life among grandparents raising their grandchildren.
Methods : This study carried out a secondary analysis of data from the 2014 Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA) and Statistics Korea. Data collected from 224 grandparents who reported raising their grandchildren were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, ANOVA, pearson correlation coefficient, and multilevel regression analysis.
Results : The mean score of the participants' quality of life was 62.63. Significant predictors of quality of life of the grandparents included subjective health status, last year's total house income, number of last year's travels, frequency of last year's movie seeing, and number of children's parks per 100,000 population.
Conclusion : These results suggest that public health nurses in improving quality of life of grandparents focus on children's parks and formal social supports as community factors as well as regular exercise as an individual factor in order to be more effective.ope
Current status and future demand for rehabilitation in stroke patients after discharge.
보건μ μ±
λ° κ΄λ¦¬νκ³Ό/μμ¬[νκΈ]
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ λμ‘Έμ€ ν μ¬ν λ³λμμ μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°κ³ ν΄μν νμλ€μ ν΄μ ν μ¬ν μΉλ£ νν© λ° μν₯μ μ£Όλ νμμ μ§λ³ λ° μΈκ΅¬?μ¬ν?κ²½μ νμ νΉμ±κ³Ό νμμ ν볡 μ λ, μΉλ£μ λν μꡬ λ° μ νΈνλ μΉλ£ λ°©μμ λν΄ μ‘°μ¬νμ¬ λμ‘Έμ€ νμμ μ¬ν μΉλ£ μ²΄κ³ μ€λ¦½κ³Ό μ΄μμ λν κΈ°μ΄ μλ£λ₯Ό μ 곡νκ³ μ λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό μλνμλ€.
νμμ ν΄μμ μ§λ³ μνλ₯Ό μκΈ° μν΄ μ무 κΈ°λ‘μ μ΄λνμμΌλ©°, μ€ν μ‘°μ¬λ μμΈμλ΄ 1κ° μ’
ν© λ³μμμ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°κ³ ν΄μν 470λͺ
μ νμλ€μ λμμΌλ‘ ꡬ쑰νλ μ€λ¬Έμ§λ₯Ό μκΈ° κΈ°μ
λ°©λ²μΌλ‘ μμ±ν λ‘ νμλ€.
νμ¬μ μ¬ν μΉλ£ νν©μ λ°λ₯Έ μꡬ μ¬νκ³Ό ν볡 μ λλ₯Ό μκΈ° μν΄ νμμ μ§λ³ λ° μΈκ΅¬?μ¬ννμ νΉμ±κ³Ό μ¬ν μΉλ£ μ 무, care giverμ μ 무μ λ°λ₯Έ μκ΄ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό ΟΒ²-testλ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μ°¨μ΄μ±μ κ²ν νμ¬ λ€μκ³Ό κ°μ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ»μλ€.
첫째, νμλ€μ νκ· μ°λ Ήμ 65μΈλ‘, 65μΈ μ΄μ λ
ΈμΈμ 68λͺ
, 65μΈ μ΄νκ° 66λͺ
μ΄μλ€. μ±λ³μ λ¨μκ° 78λͺ
, μ¬μκ° 56λͺ
μΌλ‘ λνλ¬μΌλ©°, 85.1%κ° κΈ°νΌ μνλ‘ λ°°μ°μμ λ¨ λμ΄ μ΄κ³ μμλ€. νμμ νλ ₯μ κ³ μ‘Έμ΄ 32.1%λ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μμΌλ©°, λ°λ³ μ μ§μ
μΌλ‘ λ¨μλ μ¬λ¬΄μ§, μ¬μ±μ μ£ΌλΆκ° λ§μλ€. κ°μ‘± μ 체 μ νκ· μμ
μ 200-300λ§μ λ―Έλ§κ³Ό 500λ§μ μ΄μμ΄ 24.6%λ‘ κ°μ λΉμ¨μ λνλ΄μλ€. μΉλ£λΉμ λΆλ΄μ 29.9%κ° νμ λ³ΈμΈμ΄ λΆλ΄νμμΌλ©°, 42.5%κ° μ₯μ μΈ λ±λ‘μ νκ³ μμλ€.
μ§λ³ νΉμ±μΌλ‘λ μ’μΈ‘ λ§λΉκ° 64λͺ
μΌλ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μ΄ λνλ¬μΌλ©°, λ§λΉ μ΄μΈμ λΉλ¨λ₯Ό κ°μ§ νμλ 39.6%, κ³ νμμ κ°μ§ νμλ 37.3%μ΄μλ€. νμλ€μ μμμ λλΆλΆ λͺ
λ£νμμΌλ©°, 70.1%μ νμλ€μ΄ μΈμ΄ μμμ λ¬Έμ λ₯Ό κ°μ§κ³ μμλ€. 13.46%μ νμλ€μ΄ tubeλ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μμμ μμ·¨νκ³ μμμΌλ©°, 35.1%, 33.6%μ νμλ€μ΄
μ€κΈ, μ€λ³, λΉλ¨ λ±μ λμλ³μ λ¬Έμ κ° μμλ€. μμ°½μ λλΆλΆμ νμμμ λνλμ§ μμμΌλ©°(98.5%), κΈ°κ΄ μ κ°κ°μλ μνμμ ν΄μν νμλ 4λͺ
μΌλ‘ 3%μ΄μλ€.
λμ§Έ, ν΄μ ν νμ¬ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°κ³ μλ νμ μλ 82λͺ
, λ°μ§ μλ νμμλ 50λͺ
μ΄μλ€. μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°λνμμ 53%λ μ’
ν© λ³μ/λ³μμμ μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°κ³ μμμΌλ©°, 65.4%κ° μ£Ό 2.8ν μΈλμμ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°κ³ μμλ€.
μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°λ μ΄μ λ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°μΌλ©΄ μ§κΈλ³΄λ€ κΈ°λ₯μ μΌλ‘ λμμ§ κ² κ°λ€κ³ λ΅νμμΌλ©°, μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°μ§ μλ νμλ€μ κ²½μ μ μΌλ‘ μ΄λ €μμλΌκ³ λ΅νμλ€. μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό μ€λ¨νλ μκΈ°λ 40.7%μ νμκ° μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό 1λ
μ λ λ°μ νμ΄μλ€. νμ¬ μ¬ν μΉλ£μ μν₯μ μ£Όλ μμΈμΌλ‘ νμμ μ§λ³ λ° μΈκ΅¬?μ¬ν?κ²½μ νμ νΉμ± μ€ μ§λ³μ severityκ° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ¬μΌλ©°, care giverκ° μλ κ²½μ° μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°λ κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€.
μ
μ§Έ, νμ¬μ ADL μν μ λλ₯Ό mild, moderate, severeμ μΈ κ·Έλ£ΉμΌλ‘ λλμμ λ severeκ·Έλ£Ήμ΄ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ λ°κ³ μλ κ²μ μλμλ€. νμμ ν볡 μ λμμλ ν΄μμλ³΄λ€ νμ¬ ADLμ μκ° νΈμ λ νμλ 73λͺ
, μ
νλ νμλ 15λͺ
μ΄μμΌλ©° μ μ λ³νκ° μλ νμλ 36λͺ
μ΄μλ€. νμμ μ§λ³ λ° μΈκ΅¬?μ¬ν?κ²½μ νμ νΉμ± μ€ κ°μ‘±
μ 체μ μμμ
μ΄ 500λ§μ μ΄μμ΄κ±°λ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°λ νμ κ΅°μμ ν볡 μ λκ° μ’μλ€. care giverκ° μκ³ μμμ ν° μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉμ§ μμμΌλ care giverλ‘λΆν° ν루 1-2μκ°μ λμμ λ°λ νμ κ΅°μμ ν볡 μ λκ° μ’μλ€.
λ·μ§Έ, νμ¬ μ¬ν κ΄λ ¨ μ¬μ
μ€ βμ¬ν μΉλ£βμ λν μλΉμ€ μκ΅¬κ° κ°μ₯ λμμΌλ©°, μ¬νλ κ΅κ°μ λν μꡬ μ¬νμΌλ‘λ βμλ£ νν ν보β, βμκ³ λ³΄μ₯βμ λν μκ΅¬κ° μμλ€. νμ¬ μΉλ£λ°κ³ μλ νν μ΄μΈμ μνλ μ¬ν μμ€μ ννλ‘λ βμ
μνμ¬ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°μ μ μλ μ₯κΈ° μ¬ν μΉλ£ μΌν°βμ λν μκ΅¬κ° 35.07%λ‘
λκ² λνλ¬λ€. μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°λ νμλ€μΌμλ‘ βμ¬ν μΉλ£βμ λν μλΉμ€ μκ΅¬κ° μμμΌλ©°, βμκ³ λ³΄μ₯β, βμλ£ νν ν보βμ λν μκ΅¬κ° μμλ€. λν μ΄λ€ νμμκ²μ βμ
μνμ¬ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°μ μ μλ μ₯κΈ° μ¬ν μΉλ£ μΌν°βμ λν μκ΅¬κ° μμλ€. ADLμν μ λμ λ°λ₯Έ μꡬ μ¬νμμλ severeκ·Έλ£ΉμΌμλ‘ βμ¬ν μΉλ£βμ λν μλΉμ€ μꡬμ βμκ³ λ³΄μ₯βμ λν μκ΅¬κ° μμμΌλ©°, βμ
μνμ¬ μ¬ν μΉλ£λ₯Ό λ°μ μ μλ μ₯κΈ° μ¬ν μΉλ£ μΌν°βμ λν μκ΅¬κ° μμλ€. μ₯κΈ° μ¬ν μΉλ£ μμ€μ νκ· μ 79λ§μ μ λλ‘ μΉλ£λΉμ 50%λ₯Ό 보ν κΈμ¬λ‘ λ°κΈ° μνκ³ μμλ€. μ₯κΈ° μ¬ν μΉλ£ μμ€μ΄ μκΉμΌλ‘ μ»μ΄μ§λ κΈ°λ ν¨κ³Όμ λν΄μλ λλ΄ μ€ κ°μ‘±μμ΄ λΆμ‘±ν
νμμ μΉλ£ μꡬλ₯Ό μΆ©μ‘±μν¬ μ μμΌλ©°, μ§μμ μΌλ‘ μΉλ£λ°μμΌλ‘μ¨ μΉλ£μ μ°μμ±μ΄ μλ€κ³ νμλ€.
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μ μ νμ μΌλ‘λ μμΈ μλ΄ 1κ° μ’
ν© λ³μμμ μ°κ΅¬κ° μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ Έ κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μΌλ°ννλλ°λ νκ³κ° μμΌλ©°,μ§λ³μ νΉμ±μ νμ κ°μΈμ΄ μ€λ¬Έμ μλ΅ν μ μμ κ²½μ° λ³΄νΈμκ° μ€λ¬Έμ μνλλ‘ νμκΈ° λλ¬Έμ νμμ μꡬ보λ€λ νμλ₯Ό λ보λ 보νΈμμ μκ΅¬κ° κ°μ
λμμ κ°λ₯μ±μ΄ μλ€λ κ²μ΄λ€. λν νμμ ADLκ³Ό IADLμ μ μλ₯Ό νμλ 보νΈμκ° νλ¨νμ¬ κΈ°μ
ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μ λ¬Έκ°κ° μ μλ₯Ό νλ¨ν κ²κ³Όλ μλΉν μ°¨μ΄κ° μμ μ μλ€. ν΄μμμ ADL μμ μκΈ° νμμ λ°©λ²μΌλ‘ κΈ°μ
νμκΈ° λλ¬Έμ ν΄μνμ§ 1,2λ
μ΄ μ§λ νμμ κ²½μ° κΈ°μ΅μ μν νκ³κ° μλ€κ³ λ³Ό μ μλ€. ν₯ν μ°κ΅¬μμλ care giverμ λΆλ΄κ° κ²½κ°μ΄ νμμ ν볡 λ° μ¬νμ λ―ΈμΉλ μν₯μ νμΈνλ μ°κ΅¬κ° νμν κ²μΌλ‘ μκ°λλ€.
[μλ¬Έ]
This study attempted to provide the basis data for the establishment and operation of rehabilitation systems and institutions for cerebral infarction patients by researching: 1)the rehabilitation status of discharged patients who have, after their stroke, received acute care, 2) the impact of receiving rehabilitation therapy on degree of recovery and 3) patients'' demand and preference for types of rehabilitation systems and policy.
Study subjects included 470 stroke patients who have been hospitalized and received acute care between
January 2000 and September 2002 in a hospital located in Seoul, Korea. A mailed questionnaire survey was
conducted with these patients in November, 2002. Ninety-eight patients were excluded from the study because they had died or moved out. A total of 134 patients or their caregivers answered the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 36.02% (=134/372). Also, patients'' medical chart was reviewed in order to obtain their baseline characteristics at the time of discharge. Rehabilitation status was investigated by asking the patients whether they receive rehabilitation treatments, types of treatments and institutions utilized, and reasons for not receiving rehabilitation treatments. The level of recovery
was measured by examining the difference in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores between the time of discharge and the questionnaire survey.
The survey results showed that 82 patients still received rehabilitation treatments after discharge, while 50 did not. Among those still treated, 65.4% received treatment as outpatients for an average of 2.8 times per week. One of the major reasons for discontinuing rehabilitation treatments was due to financial difficulties in paying for the treatments. About 40.7% of the respondents stopped receiving rehabilitation treatments about one year after discharge. Factors affecting the rehabilitation status were presence of comorbid conditions and severity of stroke. Patients with over 5 million Won of monthly
family income and those who still received rehabilitation treatment showed a higher degree of recovery.
The respondents demand for service in ''rehabilitation treatment,'' ''secure acquisition of medical welfare,'' and ''guarantee for livelihood.'' ''Long-term care residency facilities'' was among the most desired forms of rehabilitation institutions. Patient group with lowest ADL score showed higher demand for services in ''rehabilitation/treatment,'' ''guarantee for livelihood'' and ''long-term care residency facilities'' than those with middle or high score. Most of the patients desired 50% insurance coverage.
This study has several limitations. First, because this investigation was carried out with patients treated from one hospital, the generalizability of the study results are limited. Second, due to the characteristics of the disease, the guardian of a patient was entrusted to answer in lieu of the patient in case the patient could not fill the questionnaire. Thus, there are some possibilities that the demand of guardians, rather than that of patients themselves, may have intervened. Third, the patients'' ADL has been judged and given by the patients themselves, or their guardians, and this may have significant
differences from that an expert may give.
Through this study, it was found that the self-desire for rehabilitation and a constant, continuous therapy along with an existent care giver are crucial in a patient''s remedy. Moreover, the heavy burden of the care giver who incessantly keeps an eye on the patient was surmisable, and it is believed that future researches should be focused on what effects that reducing the burden on a care giver might have in the rehabilitation and recovery of a patient.ope
Optimization of extraction conditions for antioxidants from Zizyphus jujuba Mill. leaves using response surface methodology
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (μμ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : λμλͺ
곡νλΆ, 2011.8. μ΅μμ§.Maste