129 research outputs found

    μ—°μ†μ£Όμ‘°μ ‘ν•©κ³΅μ •μ˜ 열전달 및 μ‘κ³ ν˜„μƒμ— λŒ€ν•œ 수치적 해석

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :κΈˆμ†κ³΅ν•™κ³Ό,1997.Maste

    μƒν˜Έμ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ ꡰ집행동에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : κ²½μ œν•™λΆ€, 2012. 8. κΉ€μ˜μ‹.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μƒν˜Έμ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ ꡰ집행동에 λŒ€ν•΄ 연ꡬ해보고, ꡰ집행동을 μ•ΌκΈ°ν•˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ— λŒ€ν•΄ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ꡰ집행동(Herd Behavior)μ΄λž€ κ°œλ³„ κ²½μ œμ£Όμ²΄κ°€ λ‹€λ₯Έ 경제주체의 영ν–₯을 λ°›μ•„ μœ μ‚¬ν•œ ν–‰νƒœλ₯Ό λ³΄μž„μ„ μ˜λ―Έν•œλ‹€. 평균 λ”°λΌμž‘κΈ° 방식(μ „κΈ°, 동기)을 ν†΅ν•œ ꡰ집행동정도λ₯Ό μΈ‘μ • ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 각각의 츑정방식은 순차적인 ꡰ집행동과 같은 κΈ°κ°„λŒ€μ˜ ꡰ집행동을 보여 μ£Όμ—ˆλ‹€. 뢄석기간은 2001λ…„ μƒλ°˜κΈ°λΆ€ν„° 2011λ…„ ν•˜λ°˜κΈ°κΉŒμ§€ κ°œλ³„ μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ λŒ€μΆœμ¦κ°€μœ¨μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ λŒ€μΆœμ— κ΄€ν•œ ꡰ집행동에 κ΄€ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, κ΄€λ ¨λ³€μˆ˜μ˜ 경우 κ°œλ³„μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰ νŠΉμ„±λ³€μˆ˜λŠ” μ΄μžμˆ˜μ΅λΉ„μ€‘, μ‹ μš©λŒ€μΆœλΉ„μ€‘, κ³ μ •μ΄ν•˜ μ—¬μ‹ λΉ„μœ¨, κ°œλ³„μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ λŒ€μΆœλΉ„μ€‘, 자금의 단기화정도, κ±°μ‹œ 및 μ‚°μ—…λ³€μˆ˜λŠ” μ‹œμž₯집쀑도(HHI)μ§€μˆ˜, μ˜ˆλŒ€λ§ˆμ§„, 경기변동정도 자료λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 싀증뢄석 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석λͺ¨ν˜•μ€ ν™•λ₯ νš¨κ³Όλͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λ„μΆœν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό, μƒν˜Έμ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ 총 λŒ€μΆœμ‹œμž₯μ—μ„œ 평균 λ”°λΌμž‘κΈ° λ°©μ‹μ˜ 경우 2009 ν•˜λ°˜κΈ°μ™€ 2010λ…„ μƒλ°˜κΈ° ꡰ집행동이 λ†’κ²Œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ ꡰ집행동을 μ•ΌκΈ°ν•˜λŠ” μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œλŠ” μ „κΈ° λ”°λΌμž‘κΈ°μ˜ 경우 μ΄μžμˆ˜μ΅λΉ„μ€‘κ³Ό μ‹œμž₯집쀑도 λ³€μˆ˜μ™€ μœ μ˜λ―Έν•œ 값을 κ°€μ‘ŒμœΌλ©°, μ΄λŠ” 정보생산λŠ₯λ ₯이 μ·¨μ•½ν•œ μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μΌμˆ˜λ‘ λŒ€μΆœμ‹œμž₯에 ꡰ집행동이 심화될 수 μžˆμŒμ„ λ³΄μ—¬μ£Όμ—ˆλ‹€. λ™κΈ°μ˜ 경우 κ°œλ³„μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ λŒ€μΆœλΉ„μ€‘κ³Ό μ‹œμž₯집쀑도 λ³€μˆ˜κ°€ μœ μ˜λ―Έν•œ 값을 κ°€μ Έ μ΄λŠ” λŒ€μΆœκ·œλͺ¨μ˜ 변동이 λ‹€λ₯Έ μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰μ˜ λŒ€μΆœν–‰νƒœμ— 영ν–₯을 μ£Όμ–΄ ꡰ집행동이 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚  수 μžˆμŒμ„ 보여 μ£Όμ—ˆλ‹€.This paper analyzed herd behavior in saving banks using correlation method. I interpreted herd behavior to move the similar pattern by the interaction of participants. This paper estimated herding index was proposed by Jong-Ku Kang(2010) and what variables affected herd behavior. In the model I used the growth rate of individual saving bank loan to measure herd behavior in saving banks. Data set was collected from first half of 2001 to second half of 2011. The estimation results showed that: First, Korean saving banks herding intensity in loan market was high from second half of 2009 to first half of 2010. Second, the result of empirical estimations the intensity of each saving bank's herding as explanatory variables reveals that a saving bank with smaller amount of information is more likely to herd : The lower the interest income ratio, the higher the intensity of herding. And the variation of loan amount effects on the behavior of other saving banks loan : the higher HHI and loan market share, the more it is likely to herd.λͺ© μ°¨ 제 1 μž₯ μ„œ λ‘  1 제 1 절 μ„œ λ‘  1 제 2 절 κΈ°μ‘΄ λ¬Έν—Œ 연ꡬ 2 제 2 μž₯ λͺ¨ν˜• μ„€μ • 4 제 1 절 κ΅°μ§‘ν–‰λ™μ˜ λͺ¨ν˜•μ„€μ • 4 1.1. κ΅°μ§‘ν–‰λ™μ˜ 이둠적 λ…Όμ˜ 4 1.2. κ΅°μ§‘ν–‰λ™μ˜ μΈ‘μ • 6 1.3. λͺ¨ν˜• μ„€μ • 13 제 2 절 κ΅°μ§‘ν–‰λ™μ˜ 원인 및 μ„€λͺ…λ³€μˆ˜ μ„ μ • 14 2.1. μ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰νŠΉμ„±μ— κΈ°μΈν•œ μš”μΈ 14 2.2. μ‹œμž₯ 및 μ‚°μ—… λ³€μˆ˜ μš”μΈ 16 2.3. μ„€λͺ…λ³€μˆ˜ μ„ μ • 17 제 3 μž₯ 싀증 뢄석 18 제 1 절 자료(Data) 18 1.1. μƒν˜Έμ €μΆ•μ€ν–‰ 데이터 18 1.2. κ±°μ‹œλ³€μˆ˜ 데이터 19 제 2 절 싀증뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 19 제 4 μž₯ κ²°λ‘  및 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  22 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 25Maste

    Bacillus macerans 유래의 cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase 의 νŠΉμ„± 및 μž¬μ‘°ν•© bacillus subtilis μ—μ„œμ˜ λ°œν˜„μ— κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ

    No full text
    Thesis (doctoral)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μ‹ν’ˆκ³΅ν•™κ³Ό,1998.Docto

    경동사 "ν•˜λ‹€"의 두 가지 보어 - "ν•˜λ‹€"-어근ꡬ와 "ν•˜λ‹€"-λͺ…사ꡬ -

    No full text
    이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 2001학년도 μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ μ–Έμ–΄κ΅μœ‘μ› ν•™μˆ μ—°κ΅¬λΉ„μ˜ μ§€μ›μœΌλ‘œ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ‘Œ

    ν•˜λ‹€' 동사 ν˜•μ„±μ˜ λͺ‡ 문제

    No full text
    이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ΄ν™”μ—¬μžλŒ€ν•™κ΅ 1995학년도 κ΅λ‚΄μ—°κ΅¬λΉ„μ˜ μ§€μ›μœΌλ‘œ μ—°κ΅¬λ˜μ—ˆ

    On the Relationship of Xha- and X+reul ha-

    No full text
    In this paper, I propose to analyze 'X+ha(do )' constructions like '[chak]+ha-(be good),' '[kkaekkeut]+ha-(be clean),' '[seolmyeong]+ha-(explain)' and '[pi-ga 01 teut]+ha-( seem likely to rain)' as 'Root Phrase(RP) + Verb [+Suffix]' constructions. A root normally constitutes the base of a derivative. But I regard roots with the feature [+predicate) as a seperate pseudo part-of-speech and include 'Root Phrase (RP)' in the syntactic component. 'X' and 'ha-' are combined to form (A) '[[X]RP [ha-]V[+SUFFlX]v-'('Xha-') or (B) '[[X]NP+reul(obj. case marker) [[ha-)V[+SUFFIX]v]v'('X +reul ha-'). The 'X's in (A) and (B) are identical lexical items. So are 'ha-s' in (A) and (B). In (B), the meaning of 'X' is projected to '[ha-]v-' and therefore (B) is semantically analyzed as '[[X) NP+ reul [[e=X]RP [ha-]v[+SUFFlX]v-]v'. Hence the meaning of (A) and (B) becomes identical. Since 'ha-' in (B) has the projected meaning '[[e=x]RP [ha ]v[+SUFFlX]V-', it becomes an action, process, relation, or state verb depending on the meaning of 'X'. When 'ha- ' is used as an action or process verb, it can have 'object + verb' construction like 'X+reul ha-'. But it cannot have the 'object + verb' construction when it is a relation or state verb

    κΈ°ν›„λ³€ν™” λŒ€μ‘κ³Ό μ—λ„ˆμ§€μ •μ±…μ—­λŸ‰μ˜ κ°•ν™”

    No full text
    제6μž₯ κΈ°ν›„λ³€ν™”λŒ€μ‘κ³Ό μ—λ„ˆμ§€μ •μ±…μ—­λŸ‰μ˜ κ°•ν™” γ€€μ œ1절 μ„œλ‘ : 문제의 제기 γ€€μ œ2절 μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ μ—λ„ˆμ§€μ •μ±…κ³Ό κ³„νšμ˜ μ€‘μš”μ„± γ€€ 1. μ—λ„ˆμ§€λΆ€λ¬Έμ˜ ꡭ민경제적 μœ„μƒ γ€€ 2. μ—λ„ˆμ§€μ •μ±…κ³Ό κ³„νšμ˜ ν˜„ν™© γ€€μ œ3절 μ—λ„ˆμ§€κ³„νšμ˜ 문제점과 μ‚¬νšŒμ  λΉ„μš© μΆ”μ •: μ „λ ₯μˆ˜κΈ‰κΈ°λ³Έκ³„νšμ„ μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ γ€€ 1. μ „λ ₯μˆ˜κΈ‰κΈ°λ³Έκ³„νšκ³Ό λΆˆν™•μ‹€μ„± γ€€ 2. μƒμœ„κ³„νšκ³Ό μ „λ ₯μˆ˜κΈ‰κΈ°λ³Έκ³„νšμ˜ μ •ν•©μ„± γ€€ 3. μ „λ ₯μˆ˜κΈ‰κΈ°λ³Έκ³„νšκ³Ό μž₯κΈ°μ²œμ—°κ°€μŠ€μˆ˜κΈ‰κ³„νšμ˜ μ •ν•©μ„± γ€€μ œ4절 μ—λ„ˆμ§€μ •μ±…μ—­λŸ‰ κ°•ν™”λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 과제 γ€€ 1. μ •μ±…κΈ°λŠ₯κ³Ό μ‹œμž₯κΈ°λŠ₯의 μ‘°ν™” γ€€ 2. μ •μ±…μ—­λŸ‰μ˜ κ°•ν™”λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ λ°©μ•ˆ γ€€<μ°Έ κ³ > γ€€<보 λ‘ >TRU
    • …
    corecore