26 research outputs found

    Picturing the Buddha: Domon Kens Pilgrimages to Ancient Temples and the Shifting Notion of Japanese Art in mid-twentieth century Japan

    No full text
    ์ด ๊ธ€์€ ๋„๋ชฌ์ผ„(ๅœŸ้–€ๆ‹ณ, 1909~1990)์˜ ๋ถˆ์ƒ์‚ฌ์ง„์ด ์•„์‹œ์•„ ํƒœํ‰์–‘์ „์Ÿ๊ณผ ํŒจ์ „ ์งํ›„์˜ ์ผ๋ณธ๋ฏธ์ˆ  ๋‹ด๋ก ๊ณผ ์–ด๋–ค ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š”์ง€ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ๋‹ค. ๋„๋ชฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ „์ „์˜ ๋ณด๋„์‚ฌ์ง„๊ณผ ์ „์Ÿ๊ธฐ์˜ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ๊ฐ„๋‹ค, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ „ํ›„์˜ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๋ฆฌ์–ผ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ์†๊ณผ ๋‹จ์ ˆ์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๊ทธ๊ฐ€ ํ‰์ƒ์„ ์ฐ์–ด์™”๊ณ , ์Šค์Šค๋กœ๋„ ๋ผ์ดํ”„ ์›Œํฌ๋ผ๊ณ  ์—ฌ๊ฒผ๋˜ ๋ถˆ์ƒ์‚ฌ์ง„๋“ค์€ ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ  ๋„ํŒ, ํ˜น์€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฒฐ์—ฌ๋œ ๊ฐœ์ธ์  ์ฐฝ์ž‘๋ฌผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋˜์–ด ํ•™๋ฌธ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ฐฐ์ œ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ธ€์€ ๋„๋ชฌ์˜ ๋ถˆ์ƒ์‚ฌ์ง„์„ ๋ฏธ์ˆ ์‚ฌ, ๋ฏธ์ˆ ๋น„ํ‰์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ ๊ทน ํฌ์„ญํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณ€๋ชจํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ๋ณธ๋ฏธ์ˆ ์˜ ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์‹œ์ผœ ๋ณผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ „์‹œํ•˜ ๊ถ๊ทน์˜ ์ƒ์ง•์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๋ถˆ์ƒ์ด ์ „ํ›„์— ๊ฐ์ƒ์˜ ์˜ค๋ธŒ์ œ๋กœ ๋ณ€๋ชจํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋„๋ชฌ์˜ ์‚ฌ์ง„์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋™์‹œ์— ๋ถˆ์ƒ๊ณผ ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ , ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ณธ๋ฏธ์ˆ ์„ ๋ฐ”๋ผ๋ณด๋Š” ์–ด๋–ค ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๊ฐ€์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ง„๊ฐ€์˜ ์ฐฝ์ž‘์„ธ๊ณ„๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ œ๊ธฐ๋˜๋Š” ์ •์น˜์ , ๋ฏธํ•™์  ์งˆ๋ฌธ๋“คโ€”์ด๋ฅผํ…Œ๋ฉด ์ „ํ›„์˜ ๋ฏผ์กฑ์ฃผ์˜, ๋ฆฌ์–ผ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋”๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜, ์—ฐ์ถœ๊ณผ ์ „ํ˜•, ๊ธฐ๋ก๊ณผ ์œค๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ ๋“ฑโ€”์„ ์ผ๋ณธ๋ฏธ์ˆ ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๋ฉ”ํƒ€๋‹ด๋ก  ์†์—์„œ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•ด๋ณด๋ ค๋Š” ์ž‘๊ฐ€๋ก ์  ๋น„ํ‰์˜ ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์‹œ๋„์ด๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ „์Ÿ์„ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋กœ ํ•œ๋„๋ชฌ์˜ ์ž‘๊ฐ€์˜์‹์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ถˆ์ƒ์‚ฌ์ง„์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š”์ง€, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ•œํŽธ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ „ํ›„์˜ ๋ฏธ์ˆ ์ถœํŒ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ˆ ์ƒํ’ˆ์œผ๋กœ์„œ์˜ ๋Œ€์ค‘์„ฑ์„ ํš๋“ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ, ์ด ๊ธ€์€ ๋„๋ชฌ์˜ ๋ถˆ์ƒ์‚ฌ์ง„์„ ๋น„ํ‰์˜ ์„ฑ์—ญ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋Œ์–ด๋‚ด์–ด ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ํ˜„์‹ค๊ณผ์˜ ์ ‘์ , ํŠนํžˆ ์ „์ „โ€”์ „ํ›„์˜ ์—ฐ์†๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์ผ๋ณธ๋ฏธ์ˆ  ๋‹ด๋ก ๊ณผ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ณ„์ ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.This essay examines how the photographs of Buddhist statues taken by Domon Ken (1909- 1990) were tightly bound with the shifting notion of Japanese art from the 1940s through the 1960s. Previous studies on Domon have exclusively focused on the ideological continuity or discontinuity between his wartime propagandas and postwar social documentary works. Due to this bifurcated interpretation, Domons photographs of Buddhist statues have been bracketed as either instrumental images for the history of Buddhist art or light-hearted works that originated from his personal interests. However, Domon had taken Japanese traditional culture as the major subject matter throughout his entire artistic career, and the artist himself had regarded the photographs of Buddhist statues as what is called the life work. This paper aims to relocate Domons photographs of Buddhist statues within the field of art history and art criticism by forging their connection to the changing discourse of Japanese art. It particularly asks how his photogrpahs of Buddhist statues were received as masterpieces of photography within the rapidly growing market of art publication in the postwar era; and how his works provided a wider range of audience a new interpretative frame through which to perceive Japanese art as the object for pure love and appreciation, as well as a recuperative object to obliterate the contested memories of the wartime past.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2019๋…„๋„ ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ์ผ๋ณธ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์†Œ ์ผ๋ณธํ•™์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Œ

    Fujin Kลron and the Changing Mode of Perception and Appreciation of Ancient Japanese Art in 1960s Japan

    No full text
    ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 1960๋…„๋Œ€ ์ค‘๋ฐ˜ ์ผ๋ณธ์˜ ์—ฌ์„ฑ์žก์ง€ ใ€Ž๋ถ€์ธ๊ณต๋ก (ๅฉฆไบบๅ…ฌ่ซ–)ใ€์˜ ํ‘œ์ง€๊ฐ€ ๋™์‹œ๋Œ€์˜ ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ  ์ˆ˜์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ฐ์ƒ ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋‹ด์•„๋‚ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ง„๊ฐ€ ๋„๋ชฌ ๊ฒ(ๅœŸ้–€ๆ‹ณ)์ด ๊ธฐํš ํ•œ ๊ตญ๋ณด์™€ ์—ฌ๋ฐฐ์šฐ๋ผ๋Š” ์ œ๋ชฉ์˜ ํ‘œ์ง€์‚ฌ์ง„ ์‹œ๋ฆฌ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ผ๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋„๋ชฌ์€ 1964๋…„ 1์›”๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 1965๋…„ 12์›”๊นŒ์ง€ 2๋…„๊ฐ„ ์œ ๋ช… ์—ฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐฐ์šฐ์™€ ์ฃผ์š”๋ฌธํ™”์žฌ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์†์—์„œ ์—ฐ์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ์ด์ƒ‰์ ์ธ ํ˜• ์‹์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐํš์€ ์ฒซ์งธ, ์นœ๋ฐ€์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ง์ ‘ ์ฒดํ—˜์„ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ ์„ ๊ฐ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ง„ ์ทจ์  ์—ฌ์„ฑ์ƒ์„ ๊ทธ๋ ค ๋ƒ„์œผ๋กœ์จ, ใ€Ž๋ถ€์ธ๊ณต๋ก ใ€์˜ ๋…์ž์ธต์ธ ์ง€์‹์—ฌ์„ฑ๋Œ€์ค‘์— ์–ดํ•„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํ‘œ์ง€ ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ ค๋‚ด๋Š” ์ง„๋ณด์  ์—ฌ์„ฑ ๊ด€๊ฐ์€ ๋‹น์‹œ์˜ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ƒํ™ฉ, ์ฆ‰ 1960๋…„๋Œ€ ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ  ์—ฌ์„ฑ ๊ด€๊ฐ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์™€ ๋Œ€์ค‘ ๋ฌธํ™” ์† ์ „ํ†ต์˜ ์ฐจ์šฉ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ด๊ธฐ๋„ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ๊ตญ๋ณด์™€ ์—ฌ๋ฐฐ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋„์„ฑ์žฅ๊ธฐ ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ ์˜ ๊ด€๊ด‘์ž์›ํ™”์™€ ์—ฌ์„ฑ ์—ฌํ–‰๊ฐ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ์†์—์„œ, ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ  ์—ฌํ–‰์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ผ์ดํ”„์Šค ํƒ€์ผ์„ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์  ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋กœ ๋…์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐํš์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์•…๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ณผ ๋•Œ ๊ตญ๋ณด์™€ ์—ฌ๋ฐฐ์šฐ๋Š” 1960๋…„๋Œ€ ์ผ๋ณธ์˜ ๊ณ ๋ฏธ์ˆ  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๊ฐ์ƒ ์ฃผ์ฒด์˜ ๋‹ค๋ณ€ํ™”๋ผ๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ํฌ ์ฐฉํ•˜์—ฌ ใ€Ž๋ถ€์ธ๊ณต๋ก ใ€์˜ ๋…์ž์ธต์— ๊ณต๊ฐ๊ณผ ๋™์ผ์‹œ์˜ ์ง€๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.This essay aims to address how the cover photos of Fujin Kลron (ๅฉฆไบบๅ…ฌ่ซ–), one of popular womens magazines in Japan, shows the changing mode of perceiving and appreciating ancient Japanese art (kobijutsu) in the middle of the 1960s. Particular attention is paid to the series entitled The National Treasure and the Actress, initiated in January 1964 and continued for two years. Domon Ken took a role of photographer, while writing short comments on each cover image he pictured every month. Interestingly, he put together a national treasure and a top-level actress within a same photographic frame; and went further to allow the actress to stand just beside, or make a physical contact with, the national treasure. Such a new and unconventional mode of direction, however, squared with the marketing strategy of Fujin Kลron. The main target of this magazine was a newly emerging group of intellectual female masses, who identified themselves with a promising image of the active viewers looking at and touching on the national treasures. During the 1960s, ancient Japanese art came to be transformed into a popular form of knowledge, approachable to the diverse female groups from different regions, classes, and generations. The increasing mobility of women was another factor to explain the proliferation of female travelers, who left for historic sites and national treasures as their leisure time activity. The cover photos of Fujin Kลron deliberately captured this changing mode of perception and appreciation of ancient Japanese art, visualizing the iconic image of active female subjectivity, and thereby providing its readers an attractive site of sympathy and identification.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2019๋…„๋„ ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋ฏผ๊ตญ ๊ต์œก๋ถ€์™€ ํ•œ๊ตญ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์žฌ๋‹จ์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž„(NRFโ€“2019 S1A5A8036190)
    corecore