2 research outputs found
Prematurity—Risk Factor or Coincidence in Congenital Glaucoma?
Background and Objective: To correlate the intraocular pressure with the postconceptional age and identify a statistically significant connection between congenital glaucoma and prematurity. Materials and Methods: The current paper is a retrospective, comparative, case-control study. Data collection featured maternal age, gestational age at birth, birth weight, and intraocular ocular pressure (IOP) measurements. Results: Forty-two eyes of 21 children underwent examination. The participants were assigned into two groups. The Preterm-Glaucoma (PG) group included eight preterm-born children diagnosed with glaucoma, whereas the Preterm (P) group was comprised of premature newborns without the aforementioned condition. There was no statistically relevant difference in birth weight (p = 0.691078) nor in mean gestational age (p = 0.752623) between the two groups. The mean IOP in the PG group was 23.813 ± 4.5493, whereas in the P group, it ranged around 13.231 ± 1.0699, p < 0.0001. Using mixed-effects models, we obtained a reduction in IOP of 0.45 mmHg per week in the first month of life. A further weekly reduction of 0.36 mmHg was achieved in the next two months. Conclusions: The mean IOP of prematurely born children decreased with age. Our findings correlate with previously conducted studies, however, the drop in IOP values exceeded any data published so far. We found no correlation between prematurity and the incidence of congenital glaucoma
Revision of migrated pelvic acetabular components in THA with or without vascular involvement
Purpose. The literature describes a high rate of mortality in cases of intrapelvic acetabular component migration, which is a rare but serious complication. Our aim is to establish and propose a treatment protocol according to our results and experience. Material and Methods. We performed eight (8) total hip revisions with acetabular cup migration between 2006 and 2012. A vascular graft was needed in four (4) of these cases. Two (2) cases were revisions after a spacer for infected arthroplasties. The protocol included the following: X-Ray examination (frontal and lateral views), CT angiography, a biological evaluation, a suitable pre-operative plan, at least six (6) units of blood stock, an experienced anesthesiologist, an experienced surgical team that included a vascular surgeon and a versatile arsenal of revision prostheses, bone grafts and vascular grafts. The anterolateral approach was generally used for hip revisions and the retroperitoneal approach in the dorsal decubitus position was used when vascular risk was involved. Results: The acetabular defect was reconstructed using bone grafts and tantalum revision cups in 4 cases, Burch-Schneider cages in 2 cases, a Kerboull ring in 1 case and a cementless oblong cup (Cotyle Espace) in 1 case. In 4 cases, an iliac vessel graft procedure was conducted by the vascular surgeon. All patients survived the revision procedures and returned regularly for subsequent check-ups, during which they did not show any septic complications. Conclusions: Intrapelvic acetabular cup migration is a rare but serious complication that can occur after total hip arthroplasty in either septic or aseptic cases. An experienced, multidisciplinary team of surgeons should be involved in planning and conducting such complicated revisions