Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Background: Observational studies have suggested that accelerated surgery is associated with improved outcomes in patients with a hip fracture. The HIP ATTACK trial assessed whether accelerated surgery could reduce mortality and major complications. Methods: HIP ATTACK was an international, randomised, controlled trial done at 69 hospitals in 17 countries. Patients with a hip fracture that required surgery and were aged 45 years or older were eligible. Research personnel randomly assigned patients (1:1) through a central computerised randomisation system using randomly varying block sizes to either accelerated surgery (goal of surgery within 6 h of diagnosis) or standard care. The coprimary outcomes were mortality and a composite of major complications (ie, mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, sepsis, pneumonia, life-threatening bleeding, and major bleeding) at 90 days after randomisation. Patients, health-care providers, and study staff were aware of treatment assignment, but outcome adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02027896). Findings: Between March 14, 2014, and May 24, 2019, 27 701 patients were screened, of whom 7780 were eligible. 2970 of these were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive accelerated surgery (n=1487) or standard care (n=1483). The median time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery was 6 h (IQR 4–9) in the accelerated-surgery group and 24 h (10–42) in the standard-care group (p\u3c0·0001). 140 (9%) patients assigned to accelerated surgery and 154 (10%) assigned to standard care died, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·91 (95% CI 0·72 to 1·14) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 1% (−1 to 3; p=0·40). Major complications occurred in 321 (22%) patients assigned to accelerated surgery and 331 (22%) assigned to standard care, with an HR of 0·97 (0·83 to 1·13) and an ARR of 1% (−2 to 4; p=0·71). Interpretation: Among patients with a hip fracture, accelerated surgery did not significantly lower the risk of mortality or a composite of major complications compared with standard care. Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Safety and efficacy of two ilioiliac tension band plates osteosynthesis of fragility fractures of the pelvis

The study retrospectively determined the efficacy and safety of fixation of the pelvis (FFP) fragility fractures type IV using two tension band ilioiliac locking compression plates. Forty-one patients with FFP were treated in 2017–2020. 16 patients with FFP type IV, unable to walk weight-bearing, were treated by fixation using two tension band ilioiliac locking compression plates without fixing the anterior ring. Preoperatively and one year postoperatively, the functional outcome and performance were assessed using Pelvic Discomfort Index (PDI) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Pre- and postoperative hemoglobin level was evaluated. Operation time and intra-and postoperative complications were documented. One year postoperatively, an X-ray was taken. The arithmetic mean (x) and standard deviations (±) of quantitative variables were calculated. T-test for dependent samples was used for pre-and postoperative results comparison. The PDI improved (p < 0.001) from x = 81.42 ± 4.04 to x = 36.19 ± 15.58. Preoperatively none of the patients was able to perform the TUG test. Postoperatively, the result exceeded x = 13.13 ± 3.99 s. The operation lasted x = 42.80 ± 8.90 min. Hemoglobin decreased (p < 0.001) from 11.63 ± 1.11 to 9.07 ± 1.21 g/dL. No complications nor fixation loosening were noted. The study support fixation using two tension band ilioiliac locking compression plates as an efficient and safe treatment of the FFP type IV

Differences in Accuracy and Radiation Dose in Placement of Iliosacral Screws: Comparison between 3D and 2D Fluoroscopy

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a widely accepted method of stabilizing the posterior pelvic ring. Recently developed tools such as 3D-navigated fluoroscopy and computed navigation seem to prevent a surgeon from conducting screw misplacement. The study aimed to comparatively assess the introduction of sacroiliac screw placement using 2D and 3D fluoroscopy in terms of accuracy and radiation exposure. Iliosacral screws were introduced in 37 patients using 2D (group N1) and in 36 patients using 3D fluoroscopy (group N2) techniques. Overall, 61 and 56 screws were introduced in groups N1 and N2, respectively. Screw placement accuracy was assessed using postoperative computed tomography and Smith’s scale. Intraoperative radiation exposure was also assessed. No differences were noted between groups in terms of screw positioning accuracy and radiation dose. Both 2D and 3D fluoroscopy provide good visualization for safely placing percutaneous iliosacral joint screws. Using 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation in comparison with 2D fluoroscopy is not advantageous

Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK-1) : a kidney substudy of a randomized clinical trial

To the Editor: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a lesser-known complication of hip fracture that may come about owing to decreased kidney perfusion and heightened inflammation from trauma, pain, bleeding, and fasting. Approximately 15%-20% of patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture develop AKI, with 0.5%-1.8% receiving dialysis. [...