183 research outputs found
Variations of 14-C around AD 775 and AD 1795 - due to solar activity
The motivation for our study is the disputed cause for the strong variation
of 14-C around AD 775. Our method is to compare the 14-C variation around AD
775 with other periods of strong variability. Our results are: (a) We see three
periods, where 14-C varied over 200 yr in a special way showing a certain
pattern of strong secular variation: after a Grand Minimum with strongly
increasing 14-C, there is a series of strong short-term drop(s), rise(s), and
again drop(s) within 60 yr, ending up to 200 yr after the start of the Grand
Minimum. These three periods include the strong rises around BC 671, AD 775,
and AD 1795. (b) We show with several solar activity proxies (radioisotopes,
sunspots, and aurorae) for the AD 770s and 1790s that such intense rapid 14-C
increases can be explained by strong rapid decreases in solar activity and,
hence, wind, so that the decrease in solar modulation potential leads to an
increase in radioisotope production. (c) The strong rises around AD 775 and
1795 are due to three effects, (i) very strong activity in the previous cycles
(i.e. very low 14-C level), (ii) the declining phase of a very strong Schwabe
cycle, and (iii) a phase of very weak activity after the strong 14-C rise --
very short and/or weak cycle(s) like the suddenly starting Dalton minimum. (d)
Furthermore, we can show that the strong change at AD 1795 happened after a
pair of two packages of four Schwabe cycles with certain hemispheric leadership
(each package consists of two Gnevyshev-Ohl pairs, respectively two
Hale-Babcock pairs). We show with several additional arguments that the rise
around AD 775 was not that special. ...Comment: 25 pages with 11 figures and 2 tables - Astronomical Notes, in pres
Presumable European aurorae in the mid AD 770s were halo displays
The interpretation of the strong 14-C variation around AD 775 as one (or
several) solar super-flare(s) by, e.g., Usoskin et al. (2013) is based on
alleged aurora sightings in the mid AD 770s in Europe: A "red cross/crucifix"
in AD 773/4/6 from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, "inflamed shields" in AD 776
(both listed in the aurora catalogue of Link 1962), and "riders on white
horses" in AD 773 (newly proposed as aurora in Usoskin et al. 2013), the two
latter from the Royal Frankish Annals. We discuss the reports about these three
sightings in detail here. We can show that all three were halo displays: The
"red cross" or "crucifix" is formed by the horizontal arc and a vertical pillar
of light (either with the Sun during sunset or with the moon after sunset); the
"inflamed shields" and the "riders on white horses" were both two mock suns,
especially the latter narrated in form of a Christian adaptation of the antique
dioscuri motive. While the latter event took place early in AD 774 (dated AD
773 in Usoskin et al. 2013), the two other sightings have to be dated AD 776,
i.e. anyway too late for being in connection with a 14-C rise that started
before AD 775. We also sketch the ideological background of those sightings and
there were many similar reports throughout that time. In addition, we present a
small drawing of a lunar halo display with horizontal arc and vertical pillar
forming a cross for shortly later, namely AD 806 June 4, the night of full
moon, also from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle; we also show historic drawings of
solar and lunar halo crosses from G. Kirch and Helevius and a modern
photograph.Comment: 17 pages with 6 figures Astronomical Notes in pres
Solar activity around AD 775 from aurorae and radiocarbon
A large variation in 14 C around AD 775 has been considered to be caused by
one or more solar super-flares within one year. We critically review all known
aurora reports from Europe as well as the Near, Middle, and Far East from AD
731 to 825 and find 39 likely true aurorae plus four more potential aurorae and
24 other reports about halos, meteors, thunderstorms etc., which were
previously misinterpreted as aurorae or misdated; we assign probabilities for
all events according to five aurora criteria. We find very likely true aurorae
in AD 743, 745, 762, 765, 772, 773, 793, 796, 807, and 817. There were two
aurorae in the early 770s observed near Amida (now Diyarbakir in Turkey near
the Turkish-Syrian border), which were not only red, but also green-yellow -
being at a relatively low geo-magnetic latidude, they indicate a relatively
strong solar storm. However, it cannot be argued that those aurorae
(geo-magnetical latitude 43 to 50 deg, considering five different
reconstructions of the geo-magnetic pole) could be connected to one or more
solar super-flares causing the 14 C increase around AD 775: There are several
reports about low- to mid-latitude aurorae at 32 to 44 deg geo-magnetical
latitude in China and Iraq; some of them were likely observed
(quasi-)simultaneously in two of three areas (Europe, Byzantium/Arabia, East
Asia), one lasted several nights, and some indicate a particulary strong
geo-magnetic storm (red colour and dynamics), namely in AD 745, 762, 793, 807,
and 817 - always without 14 C peaks. We use 39 likely true aurorae as well as
historic reports about sunspots together with the radiocarbon content from tree
rings to reconstruct solar activity: From about AD 733 to 823, we see at least
nine Schwabe cycles ...Comment: 24 pages with 1 table and 2 figures, paper to appear in Astronomical
Notes 24 Apr 201
Sunspot numbers based on historic records in the 1610s - early telescopic observations by Simon Marius and others
Hoyt & Schatten (1998) claim that Simon Marius would have observed the sun
from 1617 Jun 7 to 1618 Dec 31 (Gregorian calendar) all days, except three
short gaps in 1618, but would never have detected a sunspot -- based on a
quotation from Marius in Wolf (1857), but misinterpreted by Hoyt & Schatten.
Marius himself specified in early 1619 that "for one and a half year ... rather
few or more often no spots could be detected ... which was never observed
before" (Marius 1619). The generic statement by Marius can be interpreted such
that the active day fraction was below 0.5 (but not zero) from fall 1617 to
spring 1619 and that it was 1 before fall 1617 (since August 1611). Hoyt &
Schatten cite Zinner (1952), who referred to Zinner (1942), where observing
dates by Marius since 1611 are given, but which were not used by Hoyt &
Schatten. We present all relevant texts from Marius where he clearly stated
that he observed many spots in different form on and since 1611 Aug 3 (Julian)
= Aug 13 (Greg.) (on the first day together with Ahasverus Schmidnerus), 14
spots on 1612 May 30 (Julian) = Jun 9 (Greg.), which is consistent with
drawings by Galilei and Jungius for that day, the latter is shown here for the
first time, at least one spot on 1611 Oct 3 and/or 11 (Julian), i.e. Oct 13
and/or 21 (Greg.), when he changed his sunspot observing technique, he also
mentioned that he has drawn sunspots for 1611 Nov 17 (Julian) = Nov 27 (Greg.),
in addition to those clearly datable detections, there is evidence in the texts
for regular observations. ... Sunspots records by Malapert from 1618 to 1621
show that the last low-latitude spot was seen in Dec 1620, while the first
high-latitude spots were noticed in June and Oct 1620, so that the Schwabe
cycle turnover (minimum) took place around that time, ...Comment: 40 pages with 6 tables and 13 figures (paper in press), Astronomical
Notes 201
New sunspots and aurorae in the historical Chinese text corpus? Comments on uncritical digital search applications
We review some applications of the method of electronic searching for
historical observations of sunspots and aurorae in the Chinese text corpus by
Hayakawa et al. etc. However, we show strong shortcomings in the digital search
technique as applied by them: almost all likely true sunspot and aurora records
were presented before (e.g. Xu et al. 2000), which is not mentioned in those
papers; the remaining records are dubious and often refer to other phenomena,
neither spots nor aurorae (this also applies to Hayakawa et al. 2017c). Most of
the above publications include very few Chinese texts and translations, and
their tables with abbreviated keywords do not allow the reader to consider
alternative interpretations (the tables also do not specify which records
mention night-time). We have compared some of their event tables with
previously published catalogs and found various discrepancies. There are also
intrinsic inconsistencies, misleading information (lunar phase for day-time
events), and dating errors. We present Chinese texts and translations for some
of their presumable new aurorae: only one can be considered a likely true
aurora (AD 604 Jan); some others were selected on the sole basis of the use of
the word "light" or "rainbow". Several alleged new aurorae present observations
beside the Sun during day-time. There are well-known comets among their
presumable aurorae. We also discuss, (i) whether "heiqi ri pang" can stand for
black spot(s) "on one side of" or "beside" the sun, (ii) aurora color confusion
in Hayakawa et al. (2015, 2016), and (iii) whether "white" and "unusual
rainbows" can be aurorae.Comment: 20 pages with 2 figures, Astronomical Notes, in pres
GQ Lup and its common proper motion companion
Recently, Neuhaeuser et al. (2005) presented evidence for a sub-stellar,
common proper motion companion to GQ Lup. With two theoretical mass estimates,
both below the Deuterium burning minimum mass limit, the companion is probably
a planet imaged directly. We present here a more detailed astrometric analysis
of the GQ Lup system, using all the (different) proper motions published for
the primary. The common proper motion is significant in all cases, also when
taking into account the error in parallax or distance (140 +- 50 pc). When
using the weighted mean, the significance for common proper motion of GQ Lup
and its companion is 7 + 4 sigma for no change in separation plus 8 sigma for
no change in position angle. We also discuss the question, whether GQ Lup and
its common-proper motion companion are not bound, but share the same or similar
proper motion as two independent members of the Lupus T association, which is a
moving group, where most members should have the same motion anyway. Given our
discussion, this hypothesis can be rejected by several sigma: The probability
to find by chance an L-dwarf fainter than Ks = 14 mag within 0.7325 arcsec with
(almost) the same proper motion of GQ Lup is only < 3 10^{-10}. The orbital
motion of the system is not yet detected (1.4 +- 2.2 mas/yr), but is probably
smaller than the escape velocity (5.3 +- 2.1 mas/yr), so that the system may
well be gravitationally bound and stable. This is different for the
2MASSWJ1207334-393254 system, as we also show.Comment: 8 pages, 8 figure
Supernova SN 1006 in two historic Yemeni reports
We present two Arabic texts of historic observations of supernova SN 1006
from Yemen as reported by al-Yamani and Ibn al-Dayba (14th to 16th century AD).
An English translation of the report by the latter was given before (Stephenson
& Green 2002), but the original Arabic text was not yet published. In addition,
we present for the first time the earlier report, also from Yemen, namely by
al-Yamani in its original Arabic and with our English translation. It is quite
obvious that the report by Ibn al-Dayba is based on the report by al-Yamani (or
a common source), but the earlier report by al-Yamani is more detailed and in
better (Arabic) language. We discuss in detail the dating of these
observations. The most striking difference to other reports about SN 1006 is
the apparent early discovery in Yemen in the evening of 15th of Rajab of the
year 396h (i.e. AD 1006 Apr 17 \pm 2 on the Julian calendar), as reported by
both al-Yamani and Ibn al-Dayba. i.e. about 1.5 weeks earlier than the
otherwise earliest known reports. We also briefly discuss other information
from the Yemeni reports on brightness, light curve, duration of visibility,
location, stationarity, and color.Comment: 9 pages with 3 figure
Interpretation of the historic Yemeni reports of supernova SN 1006: early discovery in mid-April 1006 ?
The recently published Yemeni observing report about SN 1006 from al-Yamani
clearly gives AD 1006 Apr (mid-Rajab 396h) as first observation
date. Since this is about 1.5 weeks earlier than the otherwise earliest reports
(Apr 28 or 30) as discussed so far, we were motivated to investigate an early
sighting in more depth. We searched for additional evidences from other areas
like East Asia and Europe. We found that the date given by al-Yamani is fully
consistent with other evidence, including: (a) SN 1006 "rose several times half
an hour after sunset" (al-Yamani), which is correct for the location of Sana in
Yemen for the time around Apr 17, but it would not be correct for late Apr or
early May; (b) the date (3rd year, 3rd lunar month, 28th day wuzi, Ichidai
Yoki) for an observation of a guest star in Japan is inconsistent (there is no
day wuzi in that lunar month), but may be dated to Apr 16 by reading wuwu date
rather than a wuzi date; (c) there is observational evidence that SN 1006 was
observed in East Asia early or mid April; for the second half of April, a bad
weather (early monsoon) period is not unlikely -- there is a lack of night
reports; (d) the observer in St. Gallen reported to have seen SN 1006 "for
three months", which must have ended at the very latest on AD 1006 Jul 10,
given his northern location, so that his observations probably started in
April. We conclude that the correctly reported details give quite high
confidence in the fully self-consistent report of al-Yamani, so that the early
discovery date should be considered seriously.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figures, 1 table (in press) in Astronomical Notes 201
On the number of accreting and cooling isolated neutron stars detectable with the ROSAT All-Sky Survey
We present limits to the log N - log S curve for isolated neutron stars, both
cooling and accreting neutron stars, which are not active as radio pulsars, as
observed with the ROSAT All-Sky Survey and compare it with theoretical
expectations. So far, only one isolated neutron star is identified optically
among ROSAT sources, namely RXJ185635-3754 (Walter & Matthews 1997). Three more
promising candidates have been suggested. In addition, several upper limit
estimates are available on the space density of such neutron stars from
different optical follow-up studies. We show that the log N - log S curve
according to the current observations, including the identified neutron star,
the three additional candidates, and the upper limits, lies between the
theoretical expectations for middle-aged cooling neutron stars and old
accreting neutron stars. At least one of the neutron star candidates found so
far with ROSAT may be cooling instead of accreting. We suggest that the fact
that more accreting isolated old neutron stars were expected (e.g., Madau &
Blaes 1994) than observed is mostly due to the velocity distribution used in
those calculations. More recent radio observations indicate that there are
fewer slow neutron stars, ie., fewer accreting X-ray bright old neutron stars.
At the X-ray bright end of the log N - log S curve, however, the ROSAT
observations agree well with the theoretical expectations.Comment: text with one table and one figure, A&A in pres
A transient event in AD 775 reported by al-Tabari: A bolide - not a nova, supernova, or kilonova
Given that the cause for the strong increase in 14C in AD 774/5 in Japanese
and German trees is still a matter of debate (e.g. short Gamma-Ray Burst or
solar super-flare), we have searched in Arabic chronicles for reports about
unusual transient celestial events. In the History of al-Tabari we found two
(almost identical) reports about such an event. The group around caliph
al-Mansur observed a transient event while on the way from Baghdad to Mecca on
AD 775 Aug 29 - Sep 1 (Julian calendar). A celestial object (kawkab) was seen
to fall or set (inqadda), and its trace (atharuhu) was seen for at least tens
of minutes (up to 70-90 min) during morning twilight. The reports use the
Arabic words kawkab and athar(uhu), which were also used in the known Arabic
reports about supernovae SN 1006 and 1054, so that one might consider an
interpretation as a nova-like event. The kawkab (celestial object) was observed
only during the morning twilight at a brightness of probably between about -3
and 0 mag. Such a brightness and time-scale would be expected for optical
kilonovae (at 3 to 9 kpc) in the context of short Gamma-Ray Bursts. There are
no similar reports from eastern Asia for this time. However, the short reports
are fully consistent with a bolide: The word kawkab can be used for meteor, the
verb inqadda normally means "falling down", the word atharuhu can mean "its
trace". We therefore prefer the interpretation as bolide. We discuss in detail
how to convert the Muslim calendar date to a date in the Julian calendar using
first the calculated Islamic calendar and then considering the time when the
crescent new moon could be visible at the given location.Comment: 12 pages with three figures, paper in press (Astronomical Notes 2014)
- small corrections applie
- …