2,477 research outputs found
A Truthful Mechanism for the Generalized Assignment Problem
We propose a truthful-in-expectation, -approximation mechanism for a
strategic variant of the generalized assignment problem (GAP). In GAP, a set of
items has to be optimally assigned to a set of bins without exceeding the
capacity of any singular bin. In the strategic variant of the problem we study,
values for assigning items to bins are the private information of bidders and
the mechanism should provide bidders with incentives to truthfully report their
values. The approximation ratio of the mechanism is a significant improvement
over the approximation ratio of the existing truthful mechanism for GAP.
The proposed mechanism comprises a novel convex optimization program as the
allocation rule as well as an appropriate payment rule. To implement the convex
program in polynomial time, we propose a fractional local search algorithm
which approximates the optimal solution within an arbitrarily small error
leading to an approximately truthful-in-expectation mechanism. The presented
algorithm improves upon the existing optimization algorithms for GAP in terms
of simplicity and runtime while the approximation ratio closely matches the
best approximation ratio given for GAP when all inputs are publicly known.Comment: 18 pages, Earlier version accepted at WINE 201
Knowledge Representation Concepts for Automated SLA Management
Outsourcing of complex IT infrastructure to IT service providers has
increased substantially during the past years. IT service providers must be
able to fulfil their service-quality commitments based upon predefined Service
Level Agreements (SLAs) with the service customer. They need to manage, execute
and maintain thousands of SLAs for different customers and different types of
services, which needs new levels of flexibility and automation not available
with the current technology. The complexity of contractual logic in SLAs
requires new forms of knowledge representation to automatically draw inferences
and execute contractual agreements. A logic-based approach provides several
advantages including automated rule chaining allowing for compact knowledge
representation as well as flexibility to adapt to rapidly changing business
requirements. We suggest adequate logical formalisms for representation and
enforcement of SLA rules and describe a proof-of-concept implementation. The
article describes selected formalisms of the ContractLog KR and their adequacy
for automated SLA management and presents results of experiments to demonstrate
flexibility and scalability of the approach.Comment: Paschke, A. and Bichler, M.: Knowledge Representation Concepts for
Automated SLA Management, Int. Journal of Decision Support Systems (DSS),
submitted 19th March 200
New imperialism or new capitalism?
Over the past century, the institution of capital and the process of its accumulation have been fundamentally transformed. By contrast, the theories that explain this institution and process have remained largely unchanged. The purpose of this paper is to address this mismatch. Using a broad brush, we outline a new, power theory of capital and accumulation. We use this theory to assess the changing meaning of the corporation and the capitalist state, the new ways in which capital gets accumulated and the specific historical trajectory of twentieth-century capitalism up to the present.arms; accumulation; capital flow; capitalism; conflict; corporation; crisis; distribution; elite; energy; finance; globalization; growth; imperialism; GPE; liberalism; Marxism; Middle East; military; national interest; neoclassical economics; neoliberalism; nomos; oil; OPEC; ownership; peace; power; profit; ruling class; security; stagflation; state; stock market; TNC; United States; US; utility; value; violence; war
Cheap wars
The new conflicts of the twenty-first century â the 'infinite wars,' the 'clashes of civilization,' the 'new crusades' â are fundamentally different from the mass wars and statist military conflicts that characterized capitalism from the nineteenth century until the end of the Cold War. The novelty lies not so much in the military nature of the conflicts, as in the broader role that war now plays in capitalism.accumulation capital capitalism crisis differential accumulation distribution elite energy conflict globalization inflation Iraq Israel Keynesianism Lebanon Middle East military spending neo-liberalism oil ownership power prices profit ruling class TNC United States violence war warfare welfare Weapondollar-Petrodollar
The scientist and the church
The April 21, 2005 issue of the LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS carried a lead article titled âBlood for Oil?â The paper is attributed to a group of writers and activists â Iain Boal, T.J. Clark, Joseph Matthews and Michael Watts â who identify themselves by the collective name âRetort.â In their article, the authors advance a supposedly new explanation for the wars in the Middle East. Much of their explanation â including both theory and fact â is plagiarized. It is cut and pasted, almost âas is,â from our own work. The primary source is âThe Weapondollar-Petrodollar Coalition,â a 71 page chapter in our book THE GLOBAL POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ISRAEL (Pluto 2002). The authors also seem inspired, incognito, by our more recent papers, including âItâs All About Oilâ (2003), âClash of Civilization or Capital Accumulation?â (2004), âBeyond Neoliberalismâ (2004) and âDominant Capital and the New Warsâ (2004). In their paper, the Retort group credits us for having coined the term âWeapondollar-Petrodollar Coalitionâ â but dismiss our âprecise calibration of the oil/war nexusâ as âperfunctory.â This dismissal does not prevent them from freely appropriating, wholesale fashion, our concepts, ideas and theories â including, among others, the âera of free flow,â the âera of limited flow,â âenergy conflicts,â the âcommercialization of arms exports,â the âpoliticization of oilâ and the critique of the âscarcity thesis.â Nowhere in their article do the authors mention the source of these concepts, ideas and theories; occasionally, they even introduce them with the prefix âOur view is. . . .â Their treatment of facts is not very different. They freely use (sometimes without understanding) research methods, statistics and data that took us years to conceive, estimate and measure â again, never mentioning the source. These concepts, theories and facts are far from trivial. Until recently, they were greeted with strategic silence, from both right and left. Their publication has been repeatedly denied and censored by mainstream as well as progressive journals (including, it must be said, by the LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS, that turned down our paper on the subject). They cannot be found anywhere else in the literature, conservative or radical. To treat them as âcommon knowledgeâ is deceitful. To cut and paste them without due attribution is blatant plagiarism. The first part of our paper illustrates this process of âintellectual accumulation-by-dispossessionâ with selected examples. The issue, though, goes well beyond personal vanity and self-aggrandizement. At the core, we are dealing here with the clash of science and church, with the constant attempt of organized faith â whether religious or academic â to disable, block and, if necessary, appropriate creativity and novelty. Creativity and novelty are dangerous. They defy dogma and undermine the conventional creed; they challenge the dominant ideology and threaten those in power; occasionally, they cause the entire edifice of power to crumble. For these reasons, the latent purpose of intellectual accumulation-by-dispossession â like the accumulation of private property â is primarily negative. The word âprivateâ comes from the Latin âprivatus,â meaning ârestricted,â and from âprivare,â which means âto deprive.â And, indeed, the most important feature of private ownership is not to enable those who own, but to disable those who do not. It is only through the threat of prevention â or âstrategic sabotageâ as Thorsein Veblen called it â that accumulation can take place. It is only by restricting the free creativity of society that society itself can be controlled. The second section of the paper explains how the appropriators of âBlood for Oil?â fit this pattern. The final section of the paper is an epilogue. It describes our failed attempts to get this paper published with The LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS; Retortâs efforts to mislead us; and some additional insight from their AFFLICTED POWERS, a 2005 Verso book that contains the same plagiarism and more. The epilogue concludes with a few observations on the nature of academic dialectics.academia; arms; accumulation; capital; capitalism; church; conflict; corporation; crisis; data; development; distribution; dual; economy; elite; energy; finance; globalization; growth; imperialism; distribution; institutionalism; IPE; liberalization; methodology; Middle East; military; national interest; science; security; oil; OPEC; ownership; peace; plagiarism; politics; power; profit; religion; ruling class; sabotage; stagflation; state; TNC; United States; violence; war
Der Einfluà ökologischer Produktionsverfahren auf die Betriebsstruktur: eine deskriptive Analyse basierend auf der EU Agrarstrukturerhebung 2000
Der ökologische Landbau ist durch Richtlinien klar definiert. EinschrĂ€nkungen durch diese wirken sich auf die Betriebsorganisation aus. Basierend auf aggregierte Daten aus der Agrarstrukturerhebung 2000 wird die Betriebsstruktur von ökologischen und konventionellen Betrieben verglichen. Weiterhin wird die regionale Verteilung ausgewĂ€hlter Charakteristika des ökologischen Landbaus im Vergleich zum konvetionellen Landbau in der EU diskutiert. Die Anabaustruktur im ökologischem Landbau ist von einer weiteren Fruchtfolge als im konventionellen Landbau gekennzeichnet, die ökologische Tierhaltung durch eine geringere Viehdichte. Dies trifft jedoch nicht auf alle Regiionen und alle Tiergruppen zu. Mögliche BestimmungsgrĂŒnde fĂŒr die regionale Verteilung ökologischer Betriebe werden diskutiert
Fast Convex Decomposition for Truthful Social Welfare Approximation
Approximating the optimal social welfare while preserving truthfulness is a
well studied problem in algorithmic mechanism design. Assuming that the social
welfare of a given mechanism design problem can be optimized by an integer
program whose integrality gap is at most , Lavi and Swamy~\cite{Lavi11}
propose a general approach to designing a randomized -approximation
mechanism which is truthful in expectation. Their method is based on
decomposing an optimal solution for the relaxed linear program into a convex
combination of integer solutions. Unfortunately, Lavi and Swamy's decomposition
technique relies heavily on the ellipsoid method, which is notorious for its
poor practical performance. To overcome this problem, we present an alternative
decomposition technique which yields an approximation
and only requires a quadratic number of calls to an integrality gap verifier
Some Aspects of Aggregate Concentration in the Israeli Economy, 1964-1986
This essay examines the Israeli market structure from the perspective of ownership. We distinguish between the several corporate holding-groups that dominate the âBig Economyâ and the multitude of smaller, largely independent, business entities of the âSmall Economyâ. Although the two âsectorsâ operate under the same macroeconomic conditions, the analysis reveals marked differences in their business performance. These differences were reflected in an upward trend of aggregate concentration through the 1964-1968 period. Until the early 1970s the upward trend was moderate and was largely due to the different expansion paces of the two âsectorsâ. Since then, however, the trend intensified as the âSmall Economyâ stagnated while profits in the âBig Economyâ continued to grow.concentration dual economy holding groups Israel market structure national accounting ownership profit surplus
- âŠ