835 research outputs found
Fake News, It's Ideology Stupid
Ideology is everywhere in political speaking, writing, and conversing. The sooner everyone in the debate about fake news gets comfortable with this basic concept, the better
Marxism, Intersectionality, and Therapy
Intersectionality and marxism are not on great terms, supposedly.[1] While some thinkers and activists recognize the need for intersectional insights in research and organizing, others maintain more negative attitudes and analyses towards such insights. The negative attitudes and analyses combine a new resent with the old tension between feminist and poststructuralist critiques of Marxist theory and the latter, sometimes named "identity politics" or "identarian politics." But we should read Marx as saying that relations of production are both recognitive and distributive: that a single relation of production has a recognitive and redistributive aspect. There are two meanings of "relation of production," so why shouldn't the term mean both
The Mass Psychology of Classroom Discourse
In a majority of cases observed in classrooms over the last several decades, what has gone
by the name “discussion” is not discussion, but rather an interaction better known as recitation. If one
sees this phenomenon as a problem, then an aspect of its resolution must be theoretical (as opposed
to empirical or pedagogical): What series of conceptual terms might we adopt such that recitation does
not pass for discussion? Such a theoretical response would have to address internal and external, or
subjective and intersubjective, phenomena to describe what it means to participate in an interaction
like discussion or recitation. Next the theory would have to explain the differences between interactions
such as discussion and recitation in robust terms. Finally, these robust differences would have to
prevent the “mistaking” of discussion for recitation, and vice versa. David Backer sets out to accomplish
these three goals in the following essay. The theory he builds relies on a distinction between two
psychological-affective states: dehiscence and melancholia. Backer argues that recitation forms a mass
through melancholic introjection of a single object, while discussion forms a group that dehiscently
introjects no particular object at all. The chief finding of this essay is that viewing discussion and
recitation through the mass-psychological lens offers a new way to examine what kind of relations of
influence and power form during classroom discourse and, specifically, the political significance of those
discourses
Wrenching: On Building Coalitions
Racism is a tool the ruling class uses to make sure workers don't get together and get rid of them. Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor has articulated the same insight in reference to the Black Lives Matter movement and the recent Women's Marches. But that phenomenon--wrenching--can and does happen in many struggles, both between and within many social categories. Wrenching is one of the things that can keep the Left from getting together and warding off threats to the planet
The Purpose of Online Discussion
An argument for rethinking online discussion as an entirely different form of interaction than in-person discussion
Is Discussion an Exchange of Ideas? On Education, Money, and Speech
How do we learn the link between speech and money? What is the process of formation that
legitimates the logic whereby speech is equivalent to money? What are the experiences, events, and subjectivities
that render the connection between currency and speaking/listening intuitive? As educators and researchers,
what do we do and say to shore up this connection, and—as we may be inclined—are there things we can do or
say to loosen it? Educational discourse theory, specifically examining classroom discussion, is one of the most
prominent arenas of educational research where the equivalence between money and speech is active. While it
may seem tautological to say that “discussion is an exchange of ideas,” it is not trivial to do so. Definitions of
discussion in both reference and academic texts use the word “exchange” for discussion like Kant would use the
word “unmarried” to define a bachelor. Yet the exchange case carries connotations and denotations that the
bachelor case does not. There is more to say about it. Take this one small case—whether discussion is an
exchange of ideas—as a part of the more general inquiry about education and money/speech. Discussions
happen throughout classrooms and other educational contexts in society, and the phrase most likely passes
person-to-person in such a way as to make it obvious that what is happening in the discussion is an exchange,
perhaps making it equally obvious that money and speech are equivalent. In other words, the claim in this
article is that continually referring to discussion as an exchange of ideas teaches that speech and money are
equivalent, a proposition that has serious political consequences. It is not obviously the case that discussion is an
exchange of ideas, as I will show, and demonstrating this with a careful philosophical comb can go some distance
towards showing (and therefore teaching) that money is not equivalent to speech
Horizontal Pedagogy in Occupy Wall Street: Operationalizing Andy Merrifield's Theory of the Encounter
A history of the horizontal pedagogy workshop, which took place in Trump Tower as part of the Occupy Wall Street movement in New York City
Making the Co-operative School a Challenge Alternative: Social Reproduction Theory Revisited
While co-operative schools are different, there are different kinds of different schools. This essay
examines the type of alternative co-operative schools are, using distinctions Philip A. Woods draws
from Maori philosophy of education. While some may believe that co-operative schools are a
challenge alternative — rather than a choice or assimilation alternative — because they promote
co-operative values, I disagree. Given the structural link between schools and economy, the way we
should determine whether co-operative schools are a challenge alternative to dominant mainstream
schooling is by looking to the size and strength of the co-operative economy. Using the educational
genesis of the Mondragon co-operatives as a paradigm case, and social reproduction theory as a lens,
it is clear that the purpose of co-operative schools was and is to strengthen the co-operative economy.
The co-operative economy right now is drastically smaller and weaker than the capitalist economy in
England, and the number of co-operative schools emerging does not mean they are emerging as a
challenge alternative to dominant schooling
A Democrat Against Democracy
A look at the role Democrats played in the formation of Philadelphia's (now defunct!) School Reform Commission
- …