Comparison between cytochrome P450 (CYP) content and relative activity approaches to scaling from cDNA-expressed CYPs to human liver microsomes: ratios of accessory proteins as sources of discrepancies between approaches. Drug Metab

This paper is available online at http://www.dmd.org ABSTRACT: Relative activity factors (RAFs) and immunoquantified levels of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms both have been proposed as scaling factors for the prediction of hepatic drug metabolism from studies using cDNA-expressed CYPs. However, a systematic comparison of the two approaches, including possible mechanisms underlying differences, is not available. In this study, RAFs determined for CYPs 1A2, 2B6, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 in 12 human livers using lymphoblast-expressed enzymes were compared to immunoquantified protein levels. 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 RAFs were similar to immunoquantified enzyme levels. In contrast, 1A2 RAFs were 5-to 20-fold higher than CYP1A2 content, and the RAF:content ratio was positively correlated with the molar ratio of NADPH:CYP oxidoreductase (OR) to CYP1A2. The OR:CYP1A2 ratio in lymphoblast microsomes was 92-fold lower than in human liver microsomes. Reconstitution experiments demonstrated a 10-to 20-fold lower activity at OR:CYP1A2 ratios similar to those in lymphoblasts, compared with those in human livers. CYP2B6-containing lymphoblast microsomes had 29-and 13-fold lower OR:CYP and cytochrome b 5 :CYP ratios, respectively, than did liver microsomes and yielded RAFs that were 6-fold higher than CYP2B6 content. Use of metabolic rates from cDNA-expressed CYPs containing nonphysiologic concentrations of electron-transfer proteins (relative to human liver microsomes) in conjunction with hepatic CYP contents may lead to incorrect predictions of liver microsomal rates and relative contributions of individual isoforms. Scaling factors used in bridging the gap between expression systems and liver microsomes should not only incorporate relative hepatic abundance of individual CYPs but also account for differences in activity per unit enzyme in the two systems. The cloning and heterologous expression of the drug-metabolizing human CYPs 1 has resulted in the commercial availability of cDNAexpressed CYPs for use as reagents for in vitro quantitative phenotyping, and bridging the gap between cDNA-expressed cytochromes and human liver microsomes has been the subject of several recent reviews The turnover number of CYPs in human liver microsomes is affected by several factors that are biochemically distinct from the CYP enzyme itself. Examples include the accessory electron-transfer proteins NADPH cytochrome P450-oxidoreductase (OR) and cytochrome b 5 , membrane lipid composition, and ionic strength of the in vitro incubation matrix The relative contribution of each isoform can then be determined as follows: Enzyme kinetic studies using cDNA-expressed human CYPs are being increasingly used to define the functions v i (s) for whatever individual CYPs biotransform a drug. Such analyses indicate the relative affinities and capacities of the CYPs contributing to a biotransformation. However, the relative contribution of each enzyme cannot be estimated unless the results incorporate the scaling factors (A i ). Although immunoquantified levels of CYP isoforms in human liver microsomes RAFs are determined for specific CYPs by comparing the rate of an isoform-specific index reaction at saturating substrate concentrations in human liver microsomes (V max for liver microsomes) to the rate of the same reaction catalyzed by the specific cDNA-expressed CYP under identical conditions (V max for cDNA-expressed enzyme): Mean V max for isoform-specific reaction in human liver microsomes V max for isoform-specific reaction by cDNA expressed isoform When the numerator is expressed in picomoles metabolite per milligram of protein per minute and the denominator as picomoles of metabolite per picomole of CYP per minute, the units of RAF are picomoles of CYP per milligram of protein, which can be compared with the immunoquantified CYP contents. RAFs have been used as estimates of A i in reaction phenotyping Materials and Methods Human Liver Microsomes and Heterologously Expressed CYP Isoforms. Liver samples, obtained from the International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine (Exton, PA) or the Liver Tissue Procurement and Distribution Service (University of Minnesota), were from 12 different transplant donors (L1-L12) with no known liver disease. The donor population (median age 27 years, range 3-50 years; 5 females and 7 males) was balanced with respect to age, sex, race, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption. The tissue was partitioned and kept at Ϫ80°C until the time of microsome preparation as described previously Microsomes from cDNA-transfected human lymphoblastoid cells expressing CYP 1A2, 2B6, 2C19, 2D6, or 3A4 (Crespi, 1995) were purchased from Gentest Corporation (Woburn, MA), aliquoted and stored at Ϫ80°C, and thawed on ice before use. Lymphoblast-expressed CYPs 3A4 and 2D6 used in the study were coexpressed with OR, whereas the activities of lymphoblast- expressed CYPs 1A2, 2B6, and 2C19 were supported by endogenous levels of reductase native to the host cell line. Microsomal protein concentrations and CYP content were provided by the manufacturer. Antibodies and Quantitative Western Blotting. Concentrations of CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4/5 in human liver microsomal preparations from livers L1 to L12 were determined by quantitative Western blotting In Vitro Metabolic Incubations and Metabolite Analysis. Incubations of index substrates with human liver microsomes and lymphoblas

SER-109: An Oral Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic for Patients with Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI)

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is classified as an urgent health threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and affects nearly 500,000 Americans annually. Approximately 20–25% of patients with a primary infection experience a recurrence, and the risk of recurrence increases with subsequent episodes to greater than 40%. The leading risk factor for CDI is broad-spectrum antibiotics, which leads to a loss of microbial diversity and impaired colonization resistance. Current FDA-approved CDI treatment strategies target toxin or toxin-producing bacteria, but do not address microbiome disruption, which is key to the pathogenesis of recurrent CDI. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) reduces the risk of recurrent CDI through the restoration of microbial diversity. However, FDA safety alerts describing hospitalizations and deaths related to pathogen transmission have raised safety concerns with the use of unregulated and unstandardized donor-derived products. SER-109 is an investigational oral microbiome therapeutic composed of purified spore-forming Firmicutes. SER-109 was superior to a placebo in reducing CDI recurrence at Week 8 (12% vs. 40%, respectively; p \u3c 0.001) in adults with a history of recurrent CDI with a favorable observed safety profile. Here, we discuss the role of the microbiome in CDI pathogenesis and the clinical development of SER-109, including its rigorous manufacturing process, which mitigates the risk of pathogen transmission. Additionally, we discuss compositional and functional changes in the gastrointestinal microbiome in patients with recurrent CDI following treatment with SER-109 that are critical to a sustained clinical response

Clinically Relevant Interactions between Newer Antidepressants and Second-Generation Antipsychotics

INTRODUCTION: Combinations of newer antidepressants and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frequently used by clinicians. Pharmacokinetic drug interaction (PK DI) and poorly understood pharmacodynamic (PD) drug interaction (PD DI) can occur between them. AREAS COVERED: This paper comprehensively reviews PD DI and PK DI studies. EXPERT OPINION: More PK DI studies are needed to better establish dose correction factors after adding fluoxetine and paroxetine to aripiprazole, iloperidone and risperidone. Further PK DI studies and case reports are also needed to better establish the need for dose correction factors after adding i) fluoxetine to clozapine, lurasidone, quetiapine and olanzapine; ii) paroxetine to olanzapine; iii) fluvoxamine to asenapine, aripiprazole, iloperidone, lurasidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone; iv) high sertraline doses to aripiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone and risperidone: v) bupropion and duloxetine to aripiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone and risperidone; and vi) asenapine to paroxetine and venlafaxine. Possible beneficial PD DI effects occur after adding SGAs to newer antidepressants for treatment-resistant major depressive and obsessive-compulsive disorders. The lack of studies combining newer antidepressants and SGAs in psychotic depression is worrisome. PD DIs between newer antidepressants and SGAs may be more likely for mirtazapine and bupropion. Adding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and SGAs may increase QTc interval and may very rarely contribute to torsades de pointes

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions Involving Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004), a Multimodal Antidepressant

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The identification and quantification of potential drug–drug interactions is important for avoiding or minimizing the interaction-induced adverse events associated with specific drug combinations. Clinical studies in healthy subjects were performed to evaluate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) and co-administered agents, including fluconazole (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A inhibitor), ketoconazole (CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inhibitor), rifampicin (CYP inducer), bupropion (CYP2D6 inhibitor and CYP2B6 substrate), ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel (CYP3A substrates) and omeprazole (CYP2C19 substrate and inhibitor). METHODS: The ratio of central values of the test treatment to the reference treatment for relevant parameters (e.g., area under the plasma concentration–time curve [AUC] and maximum plasma concentration [C(max)]) was used to assess pharmacokinetic interactions. RESULTS: Co-administration of vortioxetine had no effect on the AUC or C(max) of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel or 5′-hydroxyomeprazole, or the AUC of bupropion; the 90 % confidence intervals for these ratios of central values were within 80–125 %. Steady-state AUC and C(max) of vortioxetine increased when co-administered with bupropion (128 and 114 %, respectively), fluconazole (46 and 15 %, respectively) and ketoconazole (30 and 26 %, respectively), and decreased by 72 and 51 %, respectively, when vortioxetine was co-administered with rifampicin. Concomitant therapy was generally well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: Dosage adjustment may be required when vortioxetine is co-administered with bupropion or rifampicin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40261-013-0117-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Safety and Tolerability of SER-109 as an Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic in Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Phase 3, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial

IMPORTANCE: A safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is urgently needed. Antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria but do not repair the disrupted microbiome, which promotes spore germination and infection recurrence. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and rate of CDI recurrence after administration of investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial (ECOSPOR IV) was conducted at 72 US and Canadian outpatient sites from October 2017 to April 2022. Adults aged 18 years or older with recurrent CDI were enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover patients from the ECOSPOR III trial who had CDI recurrence diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and (2) patients with at least 1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] or toxin EIA), inclusive of their acute infection at study entry. INTERVENTIONS: SER-109 given orally as 4 capsules daily for 3 days following symptom resolution after antibiotic treatment for CDI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were safety, measured as the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients receiving any amount of SER-109, and cumulative rates of recurrent CDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 24 in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Of 351 patients screened, 263 were enrolled (180 [68.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years); 29 were in cohort 1 and 234 in cohort 2. Seventy-seven patients (29.3%) were enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Overall, 141 patients (53.6%) had TEAEs, which were mostly mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. There were 8 deaths (3.0%) and 33 patients (12.5%) with serious TEAEs; none were considered treatment related by the investigators. Overall, 23 patients (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.6%-12.8%) had recurrent CDI at week 8 (4 of 29 [13.8%; 95% CI, 3.9%-31.7%] in cohort 1 and 19 of 234 [8.1%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.4%] in cohort 2), and recurrent CDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (36 patients [13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-18.4%]). At week 8, recurrent CDI rates in patients with a first recurrence were similarly low (5 of 77 [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.5%]) as in patients with 2 or more recurrences (18 of 186 [9.7%; 95% CI, 5.8%-14.9%]). Analyses by select baseline characteristics showed consistently low recurrent CDI rates in patients younger than 65 years vs 65 years or older (5 of 126 [4.0%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.0%] vs 18 of 137 [13.1%; 95% CI, 8.0%-20.0%]) and patients enrolled based on positive PCR results (3 of 69 [4.3%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.2%]) vs those with positive toxin EIA results (20 of 192 [10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-15.6%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this trial, oral SER-109 was well tolerated in a patient population with recurrent CDI and prevalent comorbidities. The rate of recurrent CDI was low regardless of the number of prior recurrences, demographics, or diagnostic approach, supporting the beneficial impact of SER-109 for patients with CDI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03183141

Safety and Tolerability of SER-109 as an Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic in Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Phase 3, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial

IMPORTANCE: A safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is urgently needed. Antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria but do not repair the disrupted microbiome, which promotes spore germination and infection recurrence. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and rate of CDI recurrence after administration of investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial (ECOSPOR IV) was conducted at 72 US and Canadian outpatient sites from October 2017 to April 2022. Adults aged 18 years or older with recurrent CDI were enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover patients from the ECOSPOR III trial who had CDI recurrence diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and (2) patients with at least 1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] or toxin EIA), inclusive of their acute infection at study entry. INTERVENTIONS: SER-109 given orally as 4 capsules daily for 3 days following symptom resolution after antibiotic treatment for CDI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were safety, measured as the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients receiving any amount of SER-109, and cumulative rates of recurrent CDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 24 in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Of 351 patients screened, 263 were enrolled (180 [68.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years); 29 were in cohort 1 and 234 in cohort 2. Seventy-seven patients (29.3%) were enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Overall, 141 patients (53.6%) had TEAEs, which were mostly mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. There were 8 deaths (3.0%) and 33 patients (12.5%) with serious TEAEs; none were considered treatment related by the investigators. Overall, 23 patients (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.6%-12.8%) had recurrent CDI at week 8 (4 of 29 [13.8%; 95% CI, 3.9%-31.7%] in cohort 1 and 19 of 234 [8.1%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.4%] in cohort 2), and recurrent CDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (36 patients [13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-18.4%]). At week 8, recurrent CDI rates in patients with a first recurrence were similarly low (5 of 77 [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.5%]) as in patients with 2 or more recurrences (18 of 186 [9.7%; 95% CI, 5.8%-14.9%]). Analyses by select baseline characteristics showed consistently low recurrent CDI rates in patients younger than 65 years vs 65 years or older (5 of 126 [4.0%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.0%] vs 18 of 137 [13.1%; 95% CI, 8.0%-20.0%]) and patients enrolled based on positive PCR results (3 of 69 [4.3%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.2%]) vs those with positive toxin EIA results (20 of 192 [10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-15.6%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this trial, oral SER-109 was well tolerated in a patient population with recurrent CDI and prevalent comorbidities. The rate of recurrent CDI was low regardless of the number of prior recurrences, demographics, or diagnostic approach, supporting the beneficial impact of SER-109 for patients with CDI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03183141

Regulation of the host immune system by helminth parasites

Helminth parasite infections are associated with a battery of immunomodulatory mechanisms, which impact all facets of the host immune response to ensure their persistence within the host. This broad-spectrum modulation of host immunity has intended and unintended consequences, both advantageous and disadvantageous. Thus the host may benefit from suppression of collateral damage during parasite infection, and from reduced allergic, autoimmune and inflammatory reactions. However, helminth infection can also be detrimental in reducing vaccine responses, increasing susceptibility to co-infection, and potentially reducing tumor immunosurveillance. In this review we will summarize the panoply of immunomodulatory mechanisms used by helminths, their potential utility in human disease, and prospective areas of future research