Rethinking the Death Penalty: Can We Define Who Deserves Death? A Symposium Held at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, May 22, 2002

In light of the defects of the capital punishment system and recent calls for a moratorium on executions, many are calling for serious reform of the system. Even some who would not eliminate the death penalty entirely propose reforms that they contend would result in fewer executions and would limit the death penalty to a category that they call the worst of the worst. This program asks the question: Is there a category of defendants who are the worst of the worst? Can a crime be so heinous that a defendant can be said to deserve to be executed? Would such a limited death penalty be supportable morally, philosophically, and constitutionally

Rethinking the Death Penalty: Can We Define Who Deserves Death – A Symposium Held at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York May 22, 2002

In light of the defects of the capital punishment system and recent calls for a moratorium on executions, many are calling for serious reform of the system. Even some who would not eliminate the death penalty entirely propose reforms that they contend would result in fewer executions and would limit the death penalty to a category that they call the worst of the worst. This program asks the question: Is there a category of defendants who are the worst of the worst? Can a crime be so heinous that a defendant can be said to deserve to be executed? Would such a limited death penalty be supportable morally, philosophically, and constitutionally

Rethinking the Death Penalty: Can We Define Who Deserves Death – A Symposium Held at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York May 22, 2002

In light of the defects of the capital punishment system and recent calls for a moratorium on executions, many are calling for serious reform of the system. Even some who would not eliminate the death penalty entirely propose reforms that they contend would result in fewer executions and would limit the death penalty to a category that they call the worst of the worst. This program asks the question: Is there a category of defendants who are the worst of the worst? Can a crime be so heinous that a defendant can be said to deserve to be executed? Would such a limited death penalty be supportable morally, philosophically, and constitutionally