8 research outputs found
Artificial intelligence for characterization of diminutive colorectal polyps::A feasibility study comparing two computer-aided diagnosis systems
BACKGROUNDArtificial intelligence (AI) has potential in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps.AIMTo evaluate the feasibility of the real-time use of the computer-aided diagnosis system (CADx) AI for ColoRectal Polyps (AI4CRP) for the optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps and to compare the performance with CAD EYETM (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). CADx influence on the optical diagnosis of an expert endoscopist was also investigated.METHODSAI4CRP was developed in-house and CAD EYE was proprietary software provided by Fujifilm. Both CADx-systems exploit convolutional neural networks. Colorectal polyps were characterized as benign or premalignant and histopathology was used as gold standard. AI4CRP provided an objective assessment of its characterization by presenting a calibrated confidence characterization value (range 0.0-1.0). A predefined cut-off value of 0.6 was set with values < 0.6 indicating benign and values ≥ 0.6 indicating premalignant colorectal polyps. Low confidence characterizations were defined as values 40% around the cut-off value of 0.6 (< 0.36 and > 0.76). Self-critical AI4CRP’s diagnostic performances excluded low confidence characterizations.RESULTSAI4CRP use was feasible and performed on 30 patients with 51 colorectal polyps. Self-critical AI4CRP, excluding 14 low confidence characterizations [27.5% (14/51)], had a diagnostic accuracy of 89.2%, sensitivity of 89.7%, and specificity of 87.5%, which was higher compared to AI4CRP. CAD EYE had a 83.7% diagnostic accuracy, 74.2% sensitivity, and 100.0% specificity. Diagnostic performances of the endoscopist alone (before AI) increased non-significantly after reviewing the CADx characterizations of both AI4CRP and CAD EYE (AI-assisted endoscopist). Diagnostic performances of the AI-assisted endoscopist were higher compared to both CADx-systems, except for specificity for which CAD EYE performed best.CONCLUSIONReal-time use of AI4CRP was feasible. Objective confidence values provided by a CADx is novel and self-critical AI4CRP showed higher diagnostic performances compared to AI4CRP.van der Zander QEW, Schreuder RM, Thijssen A, Kusters CHJ, Dehghani N, Scheeve T, Winkens B, van der Ende - van Loon MCM, de With PHN, van der Sommen F, Masclee AAM, Schoon EJ. Artificial intelligence for characterization of diminutive colorectal polyps: A feasibility study comparing two computer-aided diagnosis systems. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 5(1): 90574 [DOI: 10.37126/aige.v5.i1.90574
How does image quality affect computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps?
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths with rising incidence. Since the survival rate of CRC is correlated with the cancer stage at diagnosis, timely detection and adequate treatment strategies are of utmost importance. Technical innovations such as machine learning (ML) and its application in endoscopy show promising results, but the trust of medical doctors in ML is lacking and the ‘black box’ nature complicates the understanding of such systems in clinical practice. In contrast to CT and MRI, image quality is a limiting factor in especially endoscopic imaging, as it is very operator dependent. However, the influence of image quality on convolutional (deep) neural networks (CNNs) is insufficiently studied in relation to clinical practice and the usage of medical image data for computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CADx) systems. This paper explores the influence of degraded image quality on the performance of CNNs applied to colorectal polyp (CRP) characterization. Five commonly used CNN architectures, from simple to more complex, are employed with a custom classification head for common CRP characterization. To degrade the quality of images, distortions such as noise, blur, and contrast changes are imposed on the data and their influence on the performance degradation is studied for the mentioned CNN architectures. A large prospectively collected in vivo data set, gathered from four Dutch, both academic and community, hospitals is employed. Results for CRP characterization show that promising CNN-based methods are rather susceptible to noise and blur distortions but reasonably resilient to changes in contrast. This implies that image quality needs monitoring and control prior to directly using image data in CNN models, in order to gain trustworthy use of deep learning (DL) models in a clinical setting. We propose that incorporating an image quality indicator in CADx systems will lead to better acceptance of such systems, and is necessary for the safe implementation of DL applications in clinical practice
Automatic image and text-based description for colorectal polyps using BASIC classification
Colorectal polyps (CRP) are precursor lesions of colorectal cancer (CRC). Correct identification of CRPs during in-vivo colonoscopy is supported by the endoscopist's expertise and medical classification models. A recent developed classification model is the Blue light imaging Adenoma Serrated International Classification (BASIC) which describes the differences between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions acquired with blue light imaging (BLI). Computer-aided detection (CADe) and diagnosis (CADx) systems are efficient at visually assisting with medical decisions but fall short at translating decisions into relevant clinical information. The communication between machine and medical expert is of crucial importance to improve diagnosis of CRP during in-vivo procedures. In this work, the combination of a polyp image classification model and a language model is proposed to develop a CADx system that automatically generates text comparable to the human language employed by endoscopists. The developed system generates equivalent sentences as the human-reference and describes CRP images acquired with white light (WL), blue light imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI). An image feature encoder and a BERT module are employed to build the AI model and an external test set is used to evaluate the results and compute the linguistic metrics. The experimental results show the construction of complete sentences with an established metric scores of BLEU-1 = 0.67, ROUGE-L = 0.83 and METEOR = 0.50. The developed CADx system for automatic CRP image captioning facilitates future advances towards automatic reporting and may help reduce time-consuming histology assessment
Robust Colorectal Polyp Characterization Using a Hybrid Bayesian Neural Network
Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CADx) systems can play a crucial role as a second opinion for endoscopists to improve the overall optical diagnostic performance of colonoscopies. While such supportive systems hold great potential, optimal clinical implementation is currently impeded, since deep neural network-based systems often tend to overestimate the confidence about their decisions. In other words, these systems are poorly calibrated, and, hence, may assign high prediction scores to samples associated with incorrect model predictions. For the optimal clinical workflow integration and physician-AI collaboration, a reliable CADx system should provide accurate and well-calibrated classification confidence. An important application of these models is characterization of Colorectal polyps (CRPs), that are potential precursor lesions of Colorectal cancer (CRC). An improved optical diagnosis of CRPs during the colonoscopy procedure is essential for an appropriate treatment strategy. In this paper, we incorporate Bayesian variational inference and investigate the performance of a hybrid Bayesian neural network-based CADx system for the characterization of CRPs. Results of conducted experiments demonstrate that this Bayesian variational inference-based approach is capable of quantifying model uncertainty along with calibration confidence. This framework is able to obtain classification accuracy comparable to the deterministic version of the network, while achieving a 24.65% and 9.14% lower Expected Calibration Error (ECE) compared to the uncalibrated and calibrated deterministic network using a post-processing calibration technique, respectively