Value of screening and follow-up brain MRI scans in patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: Novel treatments make long‐term survival possible for subsets of patients with melanoma brain metastases. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may aid in early detection of brain metastases and inform treatment decisions. This study aimed to determine the impact of screening MRI scans in patients with metastatic melanoma and follow‐up MRI scans in patients with melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma or melanoma brain metastases between June 2015 and January 2018. The impact of screening MRI scans was evaluated in the first 2 years after metastatic melanoma diagnosis. The impact of follow‐up MRI scans was examined in the first year after brain metastases diagnosis. The number of MRI scans, scan indications, scan outcomes, and changes in treatment strategy were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 116 patients had no brain metastases at the time of the metastatic melanoma diagnosis. Twenty‐eight of these patients (24%) were subsequently diagnosed with brain metastases. Screening MRI scans detected the brain metastases in 11/28 patients (39%), of which 8 were asymptomatic at diagnosis. In the 96 patients with melanoma brain metastases, treatment strategy changed after 75/168 follow‐up MRI scans (45%). In patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the number of treatment changes after follow‐up MRI scans was lower when patients had been treated longer. CONCLUSION(S): Screening MRI scans aid in early detection of melanoma brain metastases, and follow‐up MRI scans inform treatment strategy. In patients with brain metastases responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors, treatment changes were less frequently observed after follow‐up MRI scans. These results can inform the development of brain imaging protocols for patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitive tumors

Clinical relevance of the radiation dose bath in lower grade glioma, a cross-sectional pilot study on neurocognitive and radiological outcome

AIM: To investigate the clinical relevance of the radiotherapy (RT) dose bath in patients treated for lower grade glioma (LGG). METHODS: Patients (n = 17) treated with RT for LGG were assessed with neurocognitive function (NCF) tests and structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and categorized in subgroups based on tumour lateralisation. RT dose, volumetric results and cerebral microbleed (CMB) number were extracted for contralateral cerebrum, contralateral hippocampus, and cerebellum. The RT clinical target volume (CTV) was included in the analysis as a surrogate for focal tumour and other treatment effects. The relationships between RT dose, CTV, NCF and radiological outcome were analysed per subgroup. RESULTS: The subgroup with left-sided tumours (n = 10) performed significantly lower on verbal tests. The RT dose to the right cerebrum, as well as CTV, were related to poorer performance on tests for processing speed, attention, and visuospatial abilities, and more CMB. In the subgroup with right-sided tumours (n = 7), RT dose in the left cerebrum was related to lower verbal memory performance, (immediate and delayed recall, r = −0.821, p = 0.023 and r = −0.937, p = 0.002, respectively), and RT dose to the left hippocampus was related to hippocampal volume (r = −0.857, p = 0.014), without correlation between CTV and NCF. CONCLUSION: By using a novel approach, we were able to investigate the clinical relevance of the RT dose bath in patients with LGG more specifically. We used combined MRI-derived and NCF outcome measures to assess radiation-induced brain damage, and observed potential RT effects on the left-sided brain resulting in lower verbal memory performance and hippocampus volume

Voxel based morphometry-detected white matter volume loss after multi-modality treatment in high grade glioma patients.

BackgroundRadiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy are components of standard multi-modality treatment of high grade gliomas (HGG) aimed at achieving local tumor control. Treatment is neurotoxic and RT plays an important role in this, inducing damage even distant to the RT target volume.PurposeThis retrospective longitudinal study evaluated the effect of treatment on white matter and gray matter volume in the tumor-free hemisphere of HGG patients using voxel based morphometry (VBM).Method3D T1-weighted MR images of 12 HGG patients at multiple timepoints during standard treatment were analyzed using VBM. Segmentation of white matter and gray matter of the tumor-free hemisphere was performed. Multiple general linear models were used to asses white matter and gray matter volumetric differences between time points. A mean RT dose map was created and compared to the VBM results.ResultsDiffuse loss of white matter volume, mainly throughout the frontal and parietal lobe, was found, grossly overlapping regions that received the highest RT dose. Significant loss of white matter was first noticed after three cycles of chemotherapy and persisted after the completion of standard treatment. No significant loss of white matter volume was observed between pre-RT and the first post-RT follow-up timepoint, indicating a delayed effect.ConclusionThis study demonstrated diffuse and early-delayed decreases in white matter volume of the tumor-free hemisphere in HGG patients after standard treatment. White matter volume changes occurred mainly throughout the frontal and parietal lobe and grossly overlapped with areas that received the highest RT dose

Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation

Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques: (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable.</p

DRAFT - EPTN consensus-based toxicity scoring standard for the follow-up of adult brain and base of skull tumours after radiotherapy

Evaluations &nbsp; Time points &nbsp; &nbsp; Baseline Follow-up after RT &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 year 2.5 years 5 years 10 years* 15 years* &nbsp; &nbsp; ± 3 months ± 3 months ± 3 months ± 3 months ± 3 months General &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Performance Score..

Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation

Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques: (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable

Spatial distribution of cerebral microbleeds and FLAIR hyperintensities on follow-up MRI after radiotherapy for lower grade glioma

Background and purpose: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and fluid-attenuated-inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensities on brain MRI scans after radiotherapy (RT) are considered markers for microvascular damage and related cognitive changes. However, the spatial distribution using existing scoring systems as well as colocation of these imaging biomarkers remain unclear, hampering clinical interpretation. This study aims to elucidate the distribution and colocation of these markers in patients with lower grade glioma (LGG). Materials and methods: CMBs were spatially classified on retrospective 1.5 T susceptibility weighted MRI scans according to the existing Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale (MARS) and were additionally scored for being located in hippocampus, amygdala, cortex, white matter (WM), grey matter (GM), WM/GM junction and for their spatial relation to FLAIR hyperintensities. Scoring was performed for whole, ipsilateral and contralateral cerebrum (with respect to tumour bulk). Results: Fifty-one scans were included of which 28 had at least one CMB. The majority of CMBs were localized in the lobar area and in deep and periventricular white matter (DPWM) - generally in WM. Only few CMBs were found in GM. In scans obtained up to 7 years after RT completion the majority of CMBs were not colocalized with FLAIR hyperintensities. Conclusion: CMBs and FLAIR hyperintensities appear to be separate imaging biomarkers for radiation therapy induced microvascular damage, as they are not colocalized in patients with LGG, especially not early on after completion of RT

The European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) consensus on the follow-up of adult patients with brain and skull base tumours treated with photon or proton irradiation

Purpose: Treatment-related toxicity after irradiation of brain tumours has been underreported in the literature. Furthermore, there is considerable heterogeneity on how and when toxicity is evaluated. The aim of this European Particle Network (EPTN) collaborative project is to develop recommendations for uniform follow-up and toxicity scoring of adult brain tumour patients treated with radiotherapy. Methods: A Delphi method-based consensus was reached among 24 international radiation-oncology experts in the field of neuro-oncology concerning the toxicity endpoints, evaluation methods and time points. Results: In this paper, we present a basic framework for consistent toxicity scoring and follow-up, using multiple levels of recommendation. Level I includes all recommendations that are considered minimum of care, whereas level II and III are optional evaluations in the advanced clinical or research setting, respectively. Per outcome domain, the clinical endpoints and evaluation methods per level are listed. Where relevant, the organ at risk threshold doses for recommended referral to specific organ specialists are defined. Conclusion: These consensus-based recommendations for follow-up will enable the collection of uniform toxicity data of brain tumour patients treated with radiotherapy. With adoptation of this standard, collaboration will be facilitated and we can further propel the research field of radiation-induced toxicities relevant for these patients. An online tool to implement this guideline in clinical practice is provided at www.cancerdata.org