Geometric analysis of stent grafts to anticipate complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular treatment for elimination of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can be applied if sufficient contact surface (apposition) between the endoprosthesis and the aortic wall can be achieved (proximal sealing zone). An AAA distal to the renal arteries can be treated with endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). An AAA involving branching arteries from the aorta can be treated with fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR). During FEVAR, a personalized endoprosthesis with openings (fenestrations) is used in which balloon-expandable covered stents (BECS) are placed to provide blood flow to the branching arteries. EVAR and FEVAR are associated with lower 30-day mortality than open surgical repair, but the reintervention rate is higher after endovascular repair compared to open surgical repair. After endovascular treatment, patients undergo lifelong monitoring with imaging to detect complications. The most common indication for reintervention after EVAR is type 1a endoleak caused by failure of the proximal sealing zone. The most frequent indications for reintervention after FEVAR are BECS related endoleaks, renal or visceral artery occlusion and stenosis. Determination of the proximal sealing zone and geometric analysis of BECS on standard CTA scans using CTA applied software is a valuable tool after endovascular treatment. Parameters such as the length of the proximal sealing zone and the effective oversizing of the endoprosthesis in the aortic neck provide information about the success of the endovascular treatment and further monitoring of the patient. The ability to assess the 3D geometry of a BECS-related complication contributes to targeted reintervention

Geometric analysis of stent grafts to anticipate complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular treatment for elimination of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can be applied if sufficient contact surface (apposition) between the endoprosthesis and the aortic wall can be achieved (proximal sealing zone). An AAA distal to the renal arteries can be treated with endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). An AAA involving branching arteries from the aorta can be treated with fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR). During FEVAR, a personalized endoprosthesis with openings (fenestrations) is used in which balloon-expandable covered stents (BECS) are placed to provide blood flow to the branching arteries. EVAR and FEVAR are associated with lower 30-day mortality than open surgical repair, but the reintervention rate is higher after endovascular repair compared to open surgical repair. After endovascular treatment, patients undergo lifelong monitoring with imaging to detect complications. The most common indication for reintervention after EVAR is type 1a endoleak caused by failure of the proximal sealing zone. The most frequent indications for reintervention after FEVAR are BECS related endoleaks, renal or visceral artery occlusion and stenosis. Determination of the proximal sealing zone and geometric analysis of BECS on standard CTA scans using CTA applied software is a valuable tool after endovascular treatment. Parameters such as the length of the proximal sealing zone and the effective oversizing of the endoprosthesis in the aortic neck provide information about the success of the endovascular treatment and further monitoring of the patient. The ability to assess the 3D geometry of a BECS-related complication contributes to targeted reintervention

Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs With Wearable Sensors During Daily Life Activities:Validation Study

BACKGROUND: Continuous telemonitoring of vital signs in a clinical or home setting may lead to improved knowledge of patients’ baseline vital signs and earlier detection of patient deterioration, and it may also facilitate the migration of care toward home. Little is known about the performance of available wearable sensors, especially during daily life activities, although accurate technology is critical for clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the data availability, accuracy, and concurrent validity of vital sign data measured with wearable sensors in volunteers during various daily life activities in a simulated free-living environment. METHODS: Volunteers were equipped with 4 wearable sensors (Everion placed on the left and right arms, VitalPatch, and Fitbit Charge 3) and 2 reference devices (Oxycon Mobile and iButton) to obtain continuous measurements of heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and temperature. Participants performed standardized activities, including resting, walking, metronome breathing, chores, stationary cycling, and recovery afterward. Data availability was measured as the percentage of missing data. Accuracy was evaluated by the median absolute percentage error (MAPE) and concurrent validity using the Bland-Altman plot with mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: A total of 20 volunteers (median age 64 years, range 20-74 years) were included. Data availability was high for all vital signs measured by VitalPatch and for HR and temperature measured by Everion. Data availability for HR was the lowest for Fitbit (4807/13,680, 35.14% missing data points). For SpO(2) measured by Everion, median percentages of missing data of up to 100% were noted. The overall accuracy of HR was high for all wearable sensors, except during walking. For RR, an overall MAPE of 8.6% was noted for VitalPatch and that of 18.9% for Everion, with a higher MAPE noted during physical activity (up to 27.1%) for both sensors. The accuracy of temperature was high for VitalPatch (MAPE up to 1.7%), and it decreased for Everion (MAPE from 6.3% to 9%). Bland-Altman analyses showed small mean differences of VitalPatch for HR (0.1 beats/min [bpm]), RR (−0.1 breaths/min), and temperature (0.5 °C). Everion and Fitbit underestimated HR up to 5.3 (LoA of −39.0 to 28.3) bpm and 11.4 (LoA of −53.8 to 30.9) bpm, respectively. Everion had a small mean difference with large LoA (−10.8 to 10.4 breaths/min) for RR, underestimated SpO(2) (>1%), and overestimated temperature up to 2.9 °C. CONCLUSIONS: Data availability, accuracy, and concurrent validity of the studied wearable sensors varied and differed according to activity. In this study, the accuracy of all sensors decreased with physical activity. Of the tested sensors, VitalPatch was found to be the most accurate and valid for vital signs monitoring

Three-Dimensional Geometric Analysis of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stents Improves Classification of Complications after Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

In balloon-expandable covered stent (BECS) associated complications after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), geometric analysis may determine the cause of failure and influence reintervention strategies. This study retrospectively classifies BECS-associated complications based on computed tomographic angiography (CTA) applied geometric analysis. BECS-associated complications of FEVAR-patients treated in two large vascular centers between 2012 and 2021 were included. The post-FEVAR CTA scans of complicated Advanta V12 BECSs were analyzed geometrically and complications were classified according to its location in the BECS. BECS fractures were classified according to an existing classification system. In 279 FEVAR-patients, 34 out of the 683 included Advanta V12 BECS (5%) presented with a complication. Two Advanta V12 complications occurred during the FEVAR procedure and 32 occurred during follow-up of which five post-FEVAR CTA scans were missing or not suitable for analysis. In the remaining 27 BECSs complications were classified as (endoleaks (n = 8), stenoses (n = 4), occlusions (n = 6), fractures (n = 3), and a combination of complications (n = 6)). All BECSs associated complications after FEVAR with available follow up CTA scans could be classified. Geometric analysis of BECS failure post-FEVAR can help to plan the reintervention strategy

Supra- and Infra-Renal Aortic Neck Diameter Increase after Endovascular Repair of a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Hypovolemia-induced hypotension may lead to an aortic diameter decrease in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). This study investigates the changes in supra- and infra-renal aortic neck diameters before and after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for rAAA and the possible association with endograft apposition. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 74 patients treated between 2010 and 2019 in two large European vascular centers. Outer-to-outer wall diameters were measured at +40, +10, 0, −10, and −20 mm relative to the lowest renal artery baseline on the last pre- and first post-EVAR computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan in a vascular workstation. Endograft apposition was determined on the first post-EVAR CTA scan. The post-operative diameter was significantly (p < 0.001) larger than the preoperative diameter at all aortic levels. The aortic diameter at +40 mm (supra-renal) and −10 mm (infra-renal) increased by 6.2 ± 7.3% and 12.6 ± 9.8%, respectively. The aortic diameter at +40 mm increased significantly more in patients with low preoperative systolic blood pressure (<90 mmHg; p = 0.005). A shorter apposition length was associated with a higher aortic diameter increase (R = −0.255; p = 0.032). Hypovolemic-induced hypotension results in a significant decrease in the aortic diameter in patients with an rAAA, which should be taken into account when oversizing the endograft

Endograft apposition and infrarenal neck enlargement after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Sufficient apposition and oversizing of the endograft in the aortic neck are both essential for durable endovascular aneurysm repair (evar). These measures are however not regularly stated on post-evar computed tomography angiography (CTa) scan reports. in this study endograft apposition and neck enlargement (NE) after EVAR with an Endurant II(s) endograft were analyzed and associated with supra- and infrarenal aortic neck morphology. MeThods: in 97 consecutive elective patients, the aortic neck morphology was measured on the pre-evar CTa scan on a 3mensio vascular workstation. The distance between the lowest renal artery and the proximal edge of the fabric (shortest fabric distance, sfd), and the shortest length of circumferential apposition between endograft and aortic wall (shortest apposition length, sal) were determined on the early postEVAR CTA scan. NE, defined as the aortic diameter change between pre- and post-EVAR CTA scan, was determined at eight levels: +40, +30, +20, +15, +10, 0, -5 and -10 mm relative to the lowest renal artery baseline. The aortic neck diameter and preoperative oversizing were correlated to NE with the Pearson correlation coefficient. The effective post-EVAR endograft oversizing is calculated from the nominal endograft diameter and the post-evar neck diameter where the endograft is circumferentially apposed. resulTs: The median time (interquartile range, iQr) between the evar procedure and the pre- and post-evar CTa scan was 40 (25, 71) days and 36 (30, 46) days, respectively. The endurant ii(s) endograft was deployed with a median (iQr) sfd of 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) mm. The sal was <10 mm in 9% of patients and significantly influenced by the pre-EVAR aortic neck length (P=0.001), hostile neck shape (P=0.017), and maximum curvature at the suprarenal aorta (P=0.039). The median (interquartile range) SAL was 21.0 (15.0, 27.0) mm with a median (IQR) pre-evar infrarenal neck length of 23.5 (13.0, 34.8) mm. The median (iQr) difference between the sal and neck length was -5.0 (-12.0, 2.8) mm. Significant (P<0.001) NE of 1.7 (0.9, 2.5) mm was observed 5 mm below the renal artery baseline, which resulted in an effective post-EVAR endograft oversizing <10% in 43% of the patients. No correlation was found between NE and aortic neck diameter or preoperative oversizing. ConClusions: Circumferential apposition between an endograft and the infrarenal aortic neck, sal, and ne can be derived from standard postoperative CT scans. These variables provide essential information about the post-procedural endograft and aortic neck morphology regardless of the preoperative measurements. Patients with SAL<10 mm or effective oversizing <10% due to NE may benefit from intensified followup, but clinical consequences of sal and ne should be evaluated in future longitudinal studies with longer term follow-up

Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures

Background: Femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of revision surgery after management with internal fixation. Using data from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial evaluating methods of internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures, we investigated associations between baseline and surgical factors and the need for revision surgery to promote healing, relieve pain, treat infection or improve function over 24 months postsurgery. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with (1) hardware removal and (2) implant exchange from cancellous screws (CS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) to total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or another internal fixation device. Methods: We identified 15 potential factors a priori that may be associated with revision surgery, 7 with hardware removal, and 14 with implant exchange. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses in our investigation. Results: Factors associated with increased risk of revision surgery included: female sex, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.50; P = 0.001], higher body mass index (fo

Supra- and Infra-Renal Aortic Neck Diameter Increase after Endovascular Repair of a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Hypovolemia-induced hypotension may lead to an aortic diameter decrease in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). This study investigates the changes in supra- and infra-renal aortic neck diameters before and after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for rAAA and the possible association with endograft apposition. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 74 patients treated between 2010 and 2019 in two large European vascular centers. Outer-to-outer wall diameters were measured at +40, +10, 0, &minus;10, and &minus;20 mm relative to the lowest renal artery baseline on the last pre- and first post-EVAR computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan in a vascular workstation. Endograft apposition was determined on the first post-EVAR CTA scan. The post-operative diameter was significantly (p &lt; 0.001) larger than the preoperative diameter at all aortic levels. The aortic diameter at +40 mm (supra-renal) and &minus;10 mm (infra-renal) increased by 6.2 &plusmn; 7.3% and 12.6 &plusmn; 9.8%, respectively. The aortic diameter at +40 mm increased significantly more in patients with low preoperative systolic blood pressure (&lt;90 mmHg; p = 0.005). A shorter apposition length was associated with a higher aortic diameter increase (R = &minus;0.255; p = 0.032). Hypovolemic-induced hypotension results in a significant decrease in the aortic diameter in patients with an rAAA, which should be taken into account when oversizing the endograft