4 research outputs found

    High intraindividual variation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal proBNP in patients with stable chronic heart failure

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are promising markers for heart failure diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Insufficient data on the intraindividual biological variation (CV(i)) of BNP and NT-proBNP hamper interpretation of changes in concentration on disease progression or treatment optimization. We therefore investigated CV(i) values in stable heart failure patients. METHODS: We recruited 43 patients with stable chronic heart failure living in Curacao (22 males, 21 females; median age, 63 years; range, 20-86 years; New York Heart Association classes I-III). Samples were collected for within-day CV(i) (n = 6; every 2 h starting at 0800), day-to-day CV(i) (n = 5; samples collected between 0800 and 1000 on 5 consecutive days), and week-to-week CV(i) (n = 6; samples collected between 0800 and 1000 on the same day of the week for 6 consecutive weeks). NT-proBNP (Roche) and BNP (Abbott) were measured by immunoassay. RESULTS: Median (range) concentrations were 134 (0-1630) ng/L (BNP) and 570 (17-5048) ng/L (NT-proBNP). Analytical variation, week-to-week CV(i), and reference change values were 8.4%, 40%, and 113% (BNP), and 3.0%, 35%, and 98% (NT-proBNP). Week-to week CV(i)s were inversely related to median BNP concentrations. Week-to week CV(i)s for BNP were 44% (BNP 350 ng/L). Both BNP and NT-proBNP increased between 0800 and 1000. Median NT-proBNP/BNP ratios were inversely related to median BNP concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The high CV(i)s hamper interpretation of changes in BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations and may partly explain their poor diagnostic values in chronic heart failure. Easily modifiable determinants to lower CV(i) have not been identified. The value of BNP and NT-proBNP for chronic heart failure diagnosis, and especially for follow-up and treatment optimization of individuals, remains largely to be established

    Optimization of folic acid, vitamin B-12, and vitamin B-6 supplements in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease

    No full text
    Using homocysteine as a functional marker, we determined optimal folic acid, vitamin B-12, and vitamin B-6 dosages in 21 pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD) patients (11 HbSS, 10 HbSC; 7-16 years). Daily supplements of folic acid (400, 700, or 1,000 mug), vitamin B-12 (1, 3, or 5 U.S. 1989 RDA), and vitamin B-6 (1 or 3 U.S. 1989 RDA) were gradually increased in an 82-week dose-escalation study. Blood was taken at 9 occasions for measurements of erythrocyte (RBC) and serum folate, plasma vitamin B-12, whole-blood vitamin B-6, and plasma homocysteine. Augmentation of folic acid from 700 to 1,000 mug and vitamin B-12 from 3 to 5 RDA did not further decrease homocysteine. Percentages of patients exhibiting significant individual homocysteine decreases amounted to 43% (folic acid from 0 to 400 mug, vitamins B-12 and B-6 from 0 to 1 RDA), 14% (folic acid from 400 to 700 mug), 24% (vitamin B-12 from 1 to 3 RDA), and 18% (vitamin B-6 from 1 to 3 RDA). The lowest plasma homocysteine at 82 weeks was 5.9 +/- 2.2 mumol/L. Patients with HbSS had higher RBC folate than HbSC. The entire group exhibited an inverse relation between RBC folate and hemoglobin. We conclude that RBC folate is less valuable for folate status assessment in SCD patients. Optimal dosages are as follows: 700 mug folic acid (3.5-7 U.S. 1989 RDA), 3 U.S. 1989 RDA vitamin B-12 (4.2-6.0 mug), and 3 U.S. 1989 RDA vitamin B-6 (4.2-6.0 mg). A practical daily combination is 1 mg folic acid (4.3-8.5 U.S. 1998 RDA when taken with meals), 6 mug vitamin B-12 (2.5-5 U.S. 1998 RDA), and 6 mg vitamin B-6 (4.6-10 U.S. 1998 RDA). This combination may by simple and relatively inexpensive means reduce these patients' inherently high risk of endothelial damage
    corecore