Serum alkaline phosphatase can be elevated in patients with hypophosphatasia due to liver disease

Background: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare inherited disorder caused by pathogenic loss-of-function variants in the ALPL gene, encoding the tissue-nonspecific isoenzym of alkaline phosphatase (ALP; TNSALP). Low serum ALP is the biochemical hallmark of HPP, but it is unknown whether ALP levels can increase due to concurring liver disease, which may lead to a missed diagnose of HPP. We present a patient with genetically confirmed HPP, who showed a transient increase of serum ALP levels due to alcohol-induced hepatitis. Clinical report: A 71-year old man was seen at our Bone Center for surveillance of HPP. Serum ALP was always low (23 U/L; reference value: &lt;115 U/L). During follow-up, his serum ALP increased (156 U/L, further rising to 204 U/L), with concomitantly elevated serum gamma-glutamyl transferase and transaminases, and a rise in bone specific ALP (18.7 μg/L; reference value: 5.7–32.9 μg/L). This was attributed to alcohol-induced hepatitis. After refraining from alcohol intake, both serum ALP and bone specific ALP levels returned to initial low levels (30 U/L and 4.3 μg/L respectively). Conclusions: We demonstrated the history of a 71-year old patient with HPP, presenting during routine follow-up with an elevated serum ALP level up to 204 U/L due to alcohol-induced hepatitis. This case illustrates that the diagnosis of HPP can potentially be missed when ALP levels are normal or elevated due to a concomitant liver disease.</p

European experience with the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for indeterminate thyroid nodules:A clinical utility study in the Netherlands

Background: The Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) were developed to improve risk stratification of indeterminate nodules. Our aim was to assess the clinical utility in a European population with restrictive diagnostic workup. Methods: Clinical utility of the GEC was assessed in a prospective multicenter cohort of 68 indeterminate nodules. Diagnostic surgical rates for Bethesda III and IV nodules were compared to a historical cohort of 171 indeterminate nodules. Samples were post hoc tested with the GSC. Results: The GEC classified 26% as benign. Surgical rates between the prospective and historical cohort did not differ (72.1% vs. 76.6%). The GSC classified 59% as benign, but misclassified six malignant lesions as benign. Conclusion: Implementation of GEC in management of indeterminate nodules in a European country with restrictive diagnostic workup is currently not supported, especially in oncocytic nodules. Prospective studies with the GSC in European countries are needed to determine the clinical utility.</p

Long-term male fertility after treatment with radioactive iodine for differentiated thyroid carcinoma

Context: Whilst radioactive iodine (RAI) is often administered in the treatment for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), long-term data on male fertility after RAI are scarce. Objective: To evaluate long-term male fertility after RAI for DTC, and to compare semen quality before and after RAI. Design, setting, and patients: Multicenter study including males with DTC ≥2 years after their final RAI treatment with a cumulative activity of ≥3.7 GBq. Main outcome measure(s): Semen analysis, hormonal evaluation, and a fertility-focused questionnaire. Cut-off scores for 'low semen quality' were based on reference values of the general population as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Results: Fifty-one participants had a median age of 40.5 (interquartile range (IQR): 34.0-49.6) years upon evaluation and a median follow-up of 5.8 (IQR: 3.0-9.5) years after their last RAI administration. The median cumulative administered activity of RAI was 7.4 (range: 3.7-23.3) GBq. The proportion of males with a low semen volume, concentration, progressive motility, or total motile sperm count did not differ from the 10th percentile cut-off of a general population (P = 0.500, P = 0.131, P = 0.094, and P = 0.500, respectively). Cryopreserved semen was used by 1 participant of the 20 who had preserved semen. Conclusions: Participants had a normal long-term semen quality. The proportion of participants with low semen quality parameters scoring below the 10th percentile did not differ from the general population. Cryopreservation of semen of males with DTC is not crucial for conceiving a child after RAI administration but may be considered in individual cases