Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial)

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in large bowel surgery are the introduction of laparoscopic surgery and the implementation of multimodal fast track recovery programs. Both focus on a faster recovery and shorter hospital stay. The randomized controlled multicenter LAFA-trial (LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care) was conceived to determine whether laparoscopic surgery, fast track perioperative care or a combination of both is to be preferred over open surgery with standard care in patients having segmental colectomy for malignant disease. METHODS/DESIGN: The LAFA-trial is a double blinded, multicenter trial with a 2 × 2 balanced factorial design. Patients eligible for segmental colectomy for malignant colorectal disease i.e. right and left colectomy and anterior resection will be randomized to either open or laparoscopic colectomy, and to either standard care or the fast track program. This factorial design produces four treatment groups; open colectomy with standard care (a), open colectomy with fast track program (b), laparoscopic colectomy with standard care (c), and laparoscopic surgery with fast track program (d). Primary outcome parameter is postoperative hospital length of stay including readmission within 30 days. Secondary outcome parameters are quality of life two and four weeks after surgery, overall hospital costs, morbidity, patient satisfaction and readmission rate. Based on a mean postoperative hospital stay of 9 +/- 2.5 days a group size of 400 patients (100 each arm) can reliably detect a minimum difference of 1 day between the four arms (alfa = 0.95, beta = 0.8). With 100 patients in each arm a difference of 10% in subscales of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire and social functioning can be detected. DISCUSSION: The LAFA-trial is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence on the merits of fast track perioperative care and laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients having segmental colectomy for malignant disease

Colon-obstructie door volvulus van sigmoïd of caecum

3 patients, 2 women aged 41 and 47 and one man aged 75 years, presented with abdominal pain and distension. In 2 patients the diagnosis 'sigmoid volvulus' was reached following plain abdominal X-ray. Both patients underwent sigmoidal resection with primary anastomosis after endoscopic deflation. The third patient proved to have a caecal volvulus on emergency laparotomy and underwent ileocaecal resection. In 2/3 of the cases diagnosis can be made by history, physical examination and conventional X-ray. Delay in the diagnosis increases the risk of peritonitis and death due to ischaemia and perforation of the colon. In the absence of peritoneal tenderness, signs of ischaemia or sepsis, the initial treatment consists of endoscopic deflation, which is successful in 68-78% of cases. Resection of the sigmoid colon is recommended a few days after endoscopic decompression in order to prevent recurrence. Caecal volvulus is not suitable for treatment with endoscopic deflation and should be treated with ileocaecal resectio

Development and validation of a colorectal functional outcome questionnaire

Background: After colorectal surgery, patients often experience impaired functional outcome. Faecal incontinence grading systems and self-assessment questionnaires are frequently used to assess these complaints. The available faecal incontinence grading systems have been validated, but have a limited focus, while more comprehensive questionnaires, which have been developed, have not been validated. Aims: To investigate the reliability and validity of a newly developed, colorectal functional outcome (COREFO) questionnaire and of Dutch translations of the Hallbook questionnaire and an adapted version of the Vaizey questionnaire. Patient/methods: Two hundred fifty-seven patients with and without impaired functional outcome after (colorectal) surgery received a booklet containing the three questionnaires in random order by mail. One hundred seventy-nine (70%) completed them, and 160 patients (90%) completed a retest within, on average, 18 days. Results/findings: Reliability and validity were adequate for the COREFO and Hallbook questionnaire, with slight differences in the psychometric analyses in favour of the COREFO questionnaire. Significantly more patients found the COREFO questionnaire to reflect their problems best. The reliability of the Vaizey questionnaire was not sufficient. Interpretation/conclusions: The newly developed COREFO questionnaire and the previously unvalidated Hallbook questionnaire are both suitable instruments to evaluate functional outcome after colorectal surgery. The psychometric analyses showed a slight difference in favour of the COREFO questionnaire and significantly more patients preferred the COREFO questionnaire to the other questionnaires. Therefore, we prefer to use the COREFO questionnaire in future researc

Unexplained abdominal pain in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery

Background There is an overall complication rate of 6.3%–10% after bariatric surgery. After ruling out anatomic/physical causes, there is a substantial group of patients who develop unexplained postsurgical abdominal pain. Objectives To inventory the prevalence of unexplained abdominal pain after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and to determine predictive factors for unexplained abdominal pain. Setting Obesity Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Methods A retrospective study in a prospective database was performed. Baseline characteristics and postoperative course were evaluated. Results A total of 1788 patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between November 2007 and April 2015. The average follow-up consisted of 33.5 months, without loss to follow-up. Abdominal pain was presented in 387 patients (21.6%). The study population consisted of 337 women (87.1%) and 50 men (12.9%); the mean age was 43.3 years (standard deviation 10.1) and the median preoperative body mass index was 43.7 kg/m². An explanation for abdominal pain was found in 246 of 387 patients (63.6%), whereas no explanation was found in 133 patients (34.4%). Revisional surgery was a significant predictor for unexplained pain (odds ratio 1.7; confidence interval 1.0–2.8; P = 0.037). Conclusion A total of 133 patients (7.4%) experienced unexplained abdominal pain after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Revisional surgery was found to be a significant predictive factor for this outcome. Present study results suggest that postoperative unexplained abdominal pain is a significant morbidity and should be part of the informed consent. More research is needed regarding further diagnosis and management and treatment

The influence of prophylactic proton pump inhibitor treatment on the development of symptomatic marginal ulceration in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients: a historic cohort study

Marginal ulceration at the gastrojejunostomy is a serious complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) and occurs in 1%-16% of patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might lower the occurrence of these ulcers. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 6 months prophylactic usage of PPIs on the development of marginal ulceration and compare this with a historic patient control group. A single institution cohort at a bariatric center of excellence, The Sint Lucas Andreas Zienkenhuis, Amsterdam A consecutive database of patients who underwent LRYGB from November 2007 to September 2012 in a single institution was retrospectively reviewed. From August 2011, patients received a standard dose of pantozol 40 mg once daily directly postoperatively for 6 months. No standard PPI prophylaxis was administered before August 2011, and the patients not using PPIs in this historic cohort served as the control group. A total of 610 patients underwent LRYGB, of which 128 patients (21.0%) underwent revisional surgery. Postoperative PPIs were administered in the intervention group of 337 patients, compared with the historic control group consisting of 273 patients. Six patients (1.2%) who received postoperative PPIs versus 20 patients (7.3 %) in the historic control group developed marginal ulceration (P = .001). Patients using proton pump inhibitors developed fewer gastrointestinal complaints postoperatively (P <.001). Routine usage of PPIs reduced the occurrence of marginal ulceration after LRYG

The Anal Fistula Plug versus the mucosal advancement flap for the treatment of Anorectal Fistula (PLUG trial)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Low transsphincteric fistulas less than 1/3 of the sphincter complex are easy to treat by fistulotomy with a high success rate. High transsphincteric fistulas remain a surgical challenge. Various surgical procedures are available, but recurrence rates of these techniques are disappointingly high. The mucosal flap advancement is considered the gold standard for the treatment of high perianal fistula of cryptoglandular origin by most colorectal surgeons. In the literature a recurrence rate between 0 and 63% is reported for the mucosal flap advancement. Recently Armstrong and colleagues reported on a new biologic anal fistula plug, a bioabsorbable xenograft made of lyophilized porcine intestinal submucosa. Their prospective series of 15 patients with high perianal fistula treated with the anal fistula plug showed promising results.</p> <p>The anal fistula plug trial is designed to compare the anal fistula plug with the mucosal flap advancement in the treatment of high perianal fistula in terms of success rate, continence, postoperative pain, and quality of life.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>The PLUG trial is a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Sixty patients with high perianal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin will be randomized to either the fistula plug or the mucosal advancement flap. Study parameters will be anorectal fistula closure-rate, continence, post-operative pain, and quality of life. Patients will be followed-up at two weeks, four weeks, and 16 weeks. At the final follow-up closure rate is determined by clinical examination by a surgeon blinded for the intervention.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Before broadly implementing the anal fistula plug results of randomized trials using the plug should be awaited. This randomized controlled trial comparing the anal fistula plug and the mucosal advancement flap should provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of the anal fistula plug in the treatment of high perianal fistulas.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p><b>ISRCTN: </b>97376902</p

Predictive Factors for Insufficient Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: Does Obstructive Sleep Apnea Influence Weight Loss?

Background: Important endpoints of bariatric surgery are weight loss and improvement of comorbidities, of which obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the highest accompanying comorbidity (70 %). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of OSA on weight loss after bariatric surgery and to provide predictive factors for insufficient weight loss (defined as ≤50 % excess weight loss (EWL)) at 1 year follow-up. Methods: All consecutive patients, who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with data on preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and pre- and postoperative body mass index (BMI) were included. After surgery, the percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) and BMI changes were compared between preoperatively diagnosed OSA-, subdivided in mild, moderate, and severe OSA, and non-OSA patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluated predictive factors for ≤50 % EWL. Results: A total of 816 patients, 522 (64 %) with and 294 (36 %) without OSA, were included. After 1 year, OSA patients achieved less %EWL than non-OSA patients (65.5 SD 20.7 versus 70.3 SD 21.0; p < 0.01). The lowest %EWL was seen in severe OSA patients (61.7 SD 20.2). However, when adjusted for waist circumference, BMI, and age, no effect of OSA was seen on %EWL or changes in BMI. Although AHI, gender, age, BMI, type of surgery, and type II diabetes were predictive factors for ≤50 % EWL (area under the curve 0.778), the AHI as variable was of little importance. Conclusions: The presence of OSA does not individually impair weight loss after bariatric surgery

Evaluation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score for the prediction of postoperative complications after primary and revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

The Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS) is a validated instrument for mortality risk prediction in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures classifying patients into low risk (class A), intermediate risk (class B), and high risk (class C). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the OS-MRS in predicting postoperative complications after LRYGB. Secondarily, the postoperative complication rate between primary and revisional LRYGB was systematically analyzed. The Obesity Center Amsterdam, located in a large teaching hospital, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The OS-MRS was applied to a consecutive database of patients who underwent LRYGB from November 2007 onwards. Postoperative complications were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Revisional LRYGB was separately analyzed. LRYGB was performed in 1667 patients either as a primary (81.5%) or revisional (18.5%) procedure. The majority (n = 1371, 82.2%) were female, mean age 44.6 (standard deviation 14.4) years and mean body mass index 44.2 (6.5) kg/m(2). Nine hundred and four (54.2%) were OS-MRS class A, 642 class B (38.5%), and 121 (7.3%) class C. Complications occurred in 143 (10.5%) and 44 (14.2%) patients after primary and revisional surgery, respectively. In both primary and revisional LRYGB, there was no association between complications and the OS-MRS classification. Subanalysis comparing primary with revisional LRYGB found a significant association between revisional surgery and the development of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo≥3) (P = .003) and mortality (P = .017). The OS-MRS was not an accurate predictor for postoperative complications in patients who underwent primary or revisional LRYGB. As in other studies, revisional surgery is an independent risk factor for the development of severe complication

Predictive factors for insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery : does obstructive sleep apnea influence weight loss?

Background: Important endpoints of bariatric surgery are weight loss and improvement of comorbidities, of which obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the highest accompanying comorbidity (70 %). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of OSA on weight loss after bariatric surgery and to provide predictive factors for insufficient weight loss (defined as ≤50 % excess weight loss (EWL)) at 1 year follow-up. Methods: All consecutive patients, who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with data on preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and pre- and postoperative body mass index (BMI) were included. After surgery, the percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) and BMI changes were compared between preoperatively diagnosed OSA-, subdivided in mild, moderate, and severe OSA, and non-OSA patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluated predictive factors for ≤50 % EWL. Results: A total of 816 patients, 522 (64 %) with and 294 (36 %) without OSA, were included. After 1 year, OSA patients achieved less %EWL than non-OSA patients (65.5 SD 20.7 versus 70.3 SD 21.0; p < 0.01). The lowest %EWL was seen in severe OSA patients (61.7 SD 20.2). However, when adjusted for waist circumference, BMI, and age, no effect of OSA was seen on %EWL or changes in BMI. Although AHI, gender, age, BMI, type of surgery, and type II diabetes were predictive factors for ≤50 % EWL (area under the curve 0.778), the AHI as variable was of little importance. Conclusions: The presence of OSA does not individually impair weight loss after bariatric surgery