Clinical Relevance of Sinus Rhythm Mapping to Quantify Electropathology Related to Atrial Fibrillation

Progression of AF is accompanied by structural and electrical remodelling, resulting in complex electrical conduction disorders. This is defined as electropathology and it increases with the progression of AF. The severity of electropathology, thus, defines the stage of AF and is a major determinant of effectiveness of AF therapy. As specific features of AF-related electropathology are still unknown, it is essential to first quantify the electrophysiological properties of atrial tissue and then to examine the inter- and intra-individual variation during normal sinus rhythm. Comparison of these parameters between patients with and without a history of AF unravels quantified electrophysiological features that are specific to AF patients. This can help to identify patients at risk for early onset or progression of AF. This review summarises current knowledge on quantified features of atrial electrophysiological properties during sinus rhythm and discusses its relevance in identifying AF-related electropathology

Conduction Velocity and Anisotropic Properties of Fibrillation Waves During Acutely Induced and Long-Standing Persistent AF

Background: Quantified features of local conduction heterogeneity due to pathological alterations of myocardial tissue could serve as a marker for the degree of electrical remodeling and hence be used to determine the stage of atrial fibrillation (AF).  In this study, the authors investigated whether local directional heterogeneity (LDH) and anisotropy ratio, derived from estimated local conduction velocities (CVs) during AF, are suitable electrical parameters to stage AF. Methods: Epicardial mapping (244-electrode array, interelectrode distance 2.25 mm) of the right atrium was performed during acute atrial fibrillation (AAF) (n = 25, 32 ± 11 years of age) and during long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) (n = 23, 64 ± 9 years of age). Episodes of 9 ± 4 seconds of AF were analyzed. Local CV vectors were constructed to assess the degree of anisotropy. Directions and magnitudes of individual vectors were compared with surrounding vectors to identify LDH. Results: Compared with the entire AAF group, LSPAF was characterized by slower conduction (71.5 ± 6.8 cm/s vs 67.6 ± 5.6 cm/s; P = 0.037) with a larger dispersion (1.59 ± 0.21 vs 1.95 ± 0.17; P &lt; 0.001) and temporal variability (32.0 ± 4.7 cm/s vs 38.5 ± 3.3 cm/s; P &lt; 0.001). Also, LSPAF was characterized by more LDH (19.6% ± 4.4% vs 26.0% ± 3.4%; P &lt; 0.001) and a higher degree of anisotropy (1.38 ± 0.07 vs 1.51 ± 0.14; P &lt; 0.001). Compared with the most complex type of AAF (type III), LSPAF was still associated with a larger CV dispersion, higher temporal variability of CV, and larger amount of LDH. Conclusions:Increasing AF complexity was associated with increased spatiotemporal variability of local CV vectors, local conduction heterogeneity, and anisotropy ratio. By using these novel parameters, LSPAF could potentially be discriminated from the most complex type of AAF. These observations may indicate pathological alterations of myocardial tissue underlying progression of AF.</p

Detection of endo-epicardial atrial low-voltage areas using unipolar and omnipolar voltage mapping

Background: Low-voltage areas (LVA) can be located exclusively at either the endocardium or epicardium. This has only been demonstrated for bipolar voltages, but the value of unipolar and omnipolar voltages recorded from either the endocardium and epicardium in predicting LVAs at the opposite layer remains unknown. The goal of this study was therefore to compare simultaneously recorded endo-epicardial unipolar and omnipolar potentials and to determine whether their voltage characteristics are predictive for opposite LVAs. Methods: Intra-operative simultaneous endo-epicardial mapping (256 electrodes, interelectrode distances 2 mm) was performed during sinus rhythm at the right atrium in 93 patients (67 ± 9 years, 73 male). Cliques of four electrodes (2 × 2 mm) were used to define maximal omnipolar (V(omni,max)) and unipolar (V(uni,max)) voltages. LVAs were defined as V(omni,max) ≤0.5 mV or V(uni,max) ≤1.0 mV. Results: The majority of both unipolar and omnipolar LVAs were located at only the endocardium (74.2% and 82.0% respectively) or epicardium (52.7% and 47.6% respectively). Of the endocardial unipolar LVAs, 25.8% were also located at the opposite layer and 47.3% vice-versa. In omnipolar LVAs, 18.0% of the endocardial LVAs were also located at the epicardium and 52.4% vice-versa. The combination of epicardial V(uni,max) and V(omni,max) was most accurate in identifying dual-layer LVAs (50.4%). Conclusion: Unipolar and omnipolar LVAs are frequently located exclusively at either the endocardium or epicardium. Endo-epicardial LVAs are most accurately identified using combined epicardial unipolar and omnipolar voltages. Therefore, a combined endo-epicardial unipolar and omnipolar mapping approach is favoured as it may be more indicative of possible arrhythmogenic substrates

Novel insights in pathophysiology of postoperative atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: Atrial extrasystoles are usually benign; however, they can also trigger atrial fibrillation. It is most likely that if atrial extrasystoles provoke a larger amount of conduction disorders and a greater degree of endo-epicardial asynchrony, the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation increases. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of programmed atrial extrasystoles on endo-epicardial conduction and postoperative atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Twelve patients (58% male, age 68 ± 7 years) underwent simultaneous endo-epicardial mapping (256 electrodes) of the right atrium during sinus rhythm and programmed atrial extrasystoles provoked from the right atrial free wall. Areas of conduction block were defined as conduction delays of ≥12 milliseconds and endo-epicardial asynchrony as activation time differences of exact opposite electrodes of ≥15 milliseconds. RESULTS: Endo-epicardial mapping data of all programmed atrial extrasystoles were analyzed and compared with sinus rhythm (median preceding cycle length = 531 milliseconds [345-787] and median sinus rhythm cycle length = 843 milliseconds [701-992]). All programmed atrial extrasystoles were aberrant (severe, moderate, and mildly aberrant, respectively, n = 6, 3, and 3) and had a mean prematurity index of 50.1 ± 11.9%. The amount of endo-epicardial asynchrony (1% [1-2] vs 6.7 [2.7-16.9], P = .006) and conduction block (1.4% [0.6-2.6] vs 8.5% [4.2-10.4], P = .005) both increased during programmed atrial extrasystoles. Interestingly, conduction block during programmed atrial extrasystoles was more severe in patients (n = 4, 33.3%) who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation (5.1% [2.9-8.8] vs 11.3% [10.1-12.1], P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial conduction disorders and endo-epicardial asynchrony, which play an important role in arrhythmogenesis, are enhanced during programmed atrial extrasystoles compared with sinus rhythm. The findings of this pilot study provide a possible explanation for enhanced vulnerability for postoperative atrial extrasystoles to induce postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients after cardiac surgery

Atrial extrasystoles enhance low-voltage fractionation electrograms in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Atrial extrasystoles (AES) provoke conduction disorders and may trigger episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the direction- and rate-dependency of electrophysiological tissue properties on epicardial unipolar electrogram (EGM) morphology is unknown. Therefore, this study examined the impact of spontaneous AES on potential amplitude, -fractionation, -duration, and low-voltage areas (LVAs), and correlated these differences with various degrees of prematurity and aberrancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intra-operative high-resolution epicardial mapping of the right and left atrium, Bachmann's Bundle, and pulmonary vein area was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) in 287 patients (60 with AF). AES were categorized according to their prematurity index (&gt;25% shortening) and degree of aberrancy (none, mild/opposite, moderate and severe). In total, 837 unique AES (457 premature; 58 mild/opposite, 355 moderate, and 154 severe aberrant) were included. The average prematurity index was 28% [12-45]. Comparing SR and AES, average voltage decreased (-1.1 [-1.2, -0.9] mV, P &lt; 0.001) at all atrial regions, whereas the amount of LVAs and fractionation increased (respectively, +3.4 [2.7, 4.1] % and +3.2 [2.6, 3.7] %, P &lt; 0.001). Only weak or moderate correlations were found between EGM morphology parameters and prematurity indices (R2 &lt; 0.299, P &lt; 0.001). All parameters were, however, most severely affected by either mild/opposite or severely aberrant AES, in which the effect was more pronounced in AF patients. Also, there were considerable regional differences in effects provoked by AES. CONCLUSION: Unipolar EGM characteristics during spontaneous AES are mainly directional-dependent and not rate-dependent. AF patients have more direction-dependent conduction disorders, indicating enhanced non-uniform anisotropy that is uncovered by spontaneous AES.</p

Identification of Critical Slowing of Conduction Using Unipolar Atrial Voltage and Fractionation Mapping

Background: Ablation strategies targeting fractionated or low-voltage potentials have been widely used in patients with persistent types of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recent studies have questioned their role in effectively representing sites of conduction slowing, and thus arrhythmogenic substrates. Objectives: The authors studied the relationship between local conduction velocity (CV) and the occurrence of fractionated and/or low-voltage potentials in order to identify areas with critically slowing of conduction. Methods: Intraoperative epicardial mapping was performed during sinus rhythm. Unipolar potentials with an amplitud

Identification of Atrial Transmural Conduction Inhomogeneity Using Unipolar Electrogram Morphology

(1) Background: Structural remodeling plays an important role in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is likely that structural remodeling occurs transmurally, giving rise to electrical endo-epicardial asynchrony (EEA). Recent studies have suggested that areas of EEA may be suitable targets for ablation therapy of AF. We hypothesized that the degree of EEA is more pronounced in areas of transmural conduction block (T-CB) than single-sided CB (SS-CB). This study examined the degree to which SS-CB and T-CB enhance EEA and which specific unipolar potential morphology parameters are predictive for SS-CB or T-CB. (2) Methods: Simultaneous endo-epicardial mapping in the human right atrium was performed in 86 patients. Potential morphology parameters included unipolar potential voltages, low-voltage areas, potential complexity (long double and fractionated potentials: LDPs and FPs), and the duration of fractionation. (3) Results: EEA was mostly affected by the presence of T-CB areas. Lower potential voltages and more LDPs and FPs were observed in T-CB areas compared to SS-CB areas. (4) Conclusion: Areas of T-CB could be most accurately predicted by combining epicardial unipolar potential morphology parameters, including voltages, fractionation, and fractionation duration (AUC = 0.91). If transmural areas of CB indeed play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of AF, they could theoretically be used as target sites for ablation

Does conduction heterogeneity determine the supervulnerable period after atrial fibrillation?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) resumes within 90 s in 27% of patients after sinus rhythm (SR) restoration. The aim of this study is to compare conduction heterogeneity during the supervulnerable period immediately after electrical cardioversion (ECV) with long-term SR in patients with AF. Epicardial mapping of both atria was performed during SR and premature atrial extrasystoles in patients in the ECV (N = 17, age: 73 ± 7 years) and control group (N = 17, age: 71 ± 6 years). Inter-electrode conduction times were used to identify areas of conduction delay (CD) (conduction times 7-11 ms) and conduction block (CB) (conduction times ≥ 12 ms). For all atrial regions, prevalences and length of longest CB and continuous CDCB lines, magnitude of conduction disorders, conduction velocity, biatrial activation time, and voltages did not differ between the ECV and control group during both SR and premature atrial extrasystoles (p ≥ 0.05). Hence, our data suggest that there may be no difference in biatrial conduction characteristics between the supervulnerable period after ECV and long-term SR in AF patients. The supervulnerable period after AF termination is not determined by conduction heterogeneity during SR and PACs. It is unknown to what extent intra-atrial conduction is impaired during the supervulnerable period immediately after ECV and whether different right and left atrial regions are equally affected. This high-resolution epicardial mapping study (upper left panel) of both atria shows that during SR the prevalences and length of longest CB and cCDCB lines (upper middle panel), magnitude of conduction disorders, CV and TAT (lower left panel), and voltages did not differ between the ECV and control group. Likewise, these parameters were comparable during PACs between the ECV and control group (lower left panel). †Non-normally distributed. cm/s = centimeters per second; mm = millimeter; ms = millisecond; AF = atrial fibrillation; AT = activation time; BB = Bachmann's bundle; cCDCB = continuous lines of conduction delay and block; CB = conduction block; CD = conduction delay; CT = conduction time; CV = conduction velocity; ECV = electrical cardioversion; LA = left atrium; LAT = local activation times; PAC = premature atrial complexes; PVA = pulmonary vein area; RA = right atrium; SR = sinus rhythm; TAT = total activation time.</p