Advanced breast cancer and its prevention by screening.

In discussions on breast cancer screening, much attention has been focussed on the possible morbidity generated by screening. Favourable effects like the prevention of advanced disease seem underestimated, probably because quantification is that difficult. To analyse the amount of care and treatment given to women with advanced breast cancer, we report on patients followed from first recurrence until death using patient files and national sources. A random sample of 60 female cases from computerised registries of two cancer centres and a sample of 20 cases from a non-computerised hospital registry was taken. A total of 68 patient files were sufficiently documented. A woman with advanced breast cancer is estimated to have a 39% loss in utility compared to a healthy woman (range 27-45%). Hormonal treatment is the main modality during 14 and chemotherapy during 4 months. Total medical cost from diagnosis of advanced disease until death amounts to 17,100 US dollars, or 21,000 when including extramural cost. The effect of breast cancer screening by preventing the occurrence of advanced disease is quantified. The resulting gain in quality of life contributes 70% of the total gain in quality of life. In the long run, almost half of the annual cost of screening will be offset by savings in the cost for advanced disease. Only the changes in palliative surgery and/or radiotherapy will be small in contrast to primary treatment changes. Besides the mortality reduction, screening is justified by the improvements in quality of life and cost savings for women prevented from reaching advanced disease

Costs of home care for advanced breast and cervical cancer in relation to cost-effectiveness of screening

The costs of home care in the Netherlands are estimated for women with advanced breast and cervical cancer. We observe a growing role of intensive home care for the terminally ill patients. The average costs of home care are dfl 8500 per patient for breast cancer patients and dfl 7200 for cervical cancer patients. More than half of these costs are incurred in the last month before death. The level of home care in the preceding months is quite modest (dfl 120 per month for both diseases), not taking into account informal care. The costs of home care for patients with advanced cancer are only slightly related to the site of the primary tumor from which the metastases originate. Total average costs per patient during advanced disease, including hospital and nursing home care, amount to dfl 42,700 for breast cancer and dfl 29,000 for cervical cancer. This difference in costs is largely attributable to the longer duration of advanced disease for breast cancer, which substantially affects hospitalcosts. The high costs of care to patients with advanced cancer contribute to a favourable cost-effectiveness ration of those screening programmes which reduce mortality and consequently the costs of care to advanced cancer patients.homecare cancer costs cost-effectiveness breast cancer cervical cancer

The costs of head and neck oncology: Primary tumours, recurrent tumours and long-term follow-up

We retrospectively calculated the costs of head and neck oncology for reimbursement purposes. This analysis was based on 854 head and neck cancer patients treated between 1994 and 1996 in two major Dutch university hospitals. To anticipate future care costs, costs of required improvements in the quality of care were added. Costs of diagnosis, treatment and 2 years of follow-up of patients with a primary tumour were €21 858. For patients with a recurrent tumour, this amount was €27 629. The costs of 10 years of follow-up were €423 after discounting and correction for survival. In total, average costs per new patient were €31 829, which covered discounted costs of treating the primary tumour, costs of treating recurrent tumours in 40% of all patients and the costs of 10 years of follow-up. Costs of improving the quality of care were estimated to be €1598 per new patient

Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors

Mammographic screening for women aged 50-70 is effective in reducing breast cancer mortality, but the impact on quality of life and the attainable mortality reduction remain to be discussed. The consequences of expanding screening programmes to include women in other age groups are uncertain. We have predicted the effects and costs for 5 popular screening variants, differing in age group and screening interval, on the basis of our analysis of the Dutch screening trials and of the reported mortality reductions in other trials. We have also investigated the influence of a large number of uncertain factors. Screening for women aged 50 and over with a 2- or 3-year interval is very cost-effective and will result in reductions of respectively 16% or 10% in breast cancer mortality in a real population. Variation of most variables keeps the cost-effectiveness (CE) ratio limited to the range of US $3,000 to 5,000 per life-year gained. A 2- to 3-fold change in CE ratio would only occur if the extreme estimates of mortality reduction in the Swedish screening trials were applied. The impact on quality of life (QoL) is limited: for the 2-yearly screening policy for women aged 50-70, the cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) gained is 4,050, whereas the cost per life-year gained is US$3,825. The CE ratio for 2-yearly screening of women aged 40-70 is 5,400, but the additional cost per additional life-year gained is US $35,000. It would be preferable by far to extend the screening programme to women over the age of 70 or to shorten the screening interval for women aged 50-70. Screening performances, the demand for mammograms outside screening and the possibility of a survival improvement irrespective of screening have a strong impact on QoL and C