Assessment of the size selectivity of peritoneal permeability by the restriction coefficient to protein transport

Transport of serum proteins from the circulation to peritoneal dialysate in peritoneal dialysis patients mainly focused on total protein. Individual proteins have hardly been studied. We determined serum and effluent concentrations of four individual proteins with a wide molecular weight range routinely in the standardised peritoneal permeability analysis performed yearly in all participating patients. These include β2-microglobulin, albumin, immunoglobulin G and α2-macroglobulin. The dependency of transport of these proteins on their molecular weight and diffusion coefficient led to the development of the peritoneal protein restriction coefficient (PPRC), which is the slope of the relation between the peritoneal clearances of these proteins and their free diffusion coefficients in water, when plotted on a double logarithmic scale. The higher the PPRC, the more size restriction to transport. In this review, we discuss the results obtained on the PPRC under various conditions, such as effects of various osmotic agents, vasoactive drugs, peritonitis and the hydrostatic pressure gradient. Long-term follow-up of patients shows an increase of the PPRC, the possible causes of which are discussed. Venous vasculopathy of the peritoneal microcirculation is the most likely explanation

The first peritonitis episode alters the natural course of peritoneal membrane characteristics in peritoneal dialysis patients

Little or no evidence is available on the impact of the first peritonitis episode on peritoneal transport characteristics. The objective of this study was to investigate the importance of the very first peritonitis episode and distinguish its effect from the natural course by comparison of peritoneal transport before and after infection. We analyzed prospectively collected data from 541 incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, aged > 18 years, between 1990 and 2010. Standard Peritoneal Permeability Analyses (SPA) within the year before and within the year after (but not within 30 days) the first peritonitis were compared. In a control group without peritonitis, SPAs within the first and second year of PD were compared. SPA data included the mass transfer area coefficient of creatinine, glucose absorption and peritoneal clearances of β-2-microglobulin (b2m), albumin, IgG and α-2-macroglobulin (a2m). From these clearances, the restriction coefficient to macromolecules (RC) was calculated. Also, parameters of fluid transport were determined: transcapillary ultrafiltration rate (TCUFR), lymphatic absorption (ELAR), and free water transport. Crude and adjusted linear mixed models were used to compare the slopes of peritoneal transport parameters in the peritonitis group to the control group. Adjustments were made for age, sex and diabetes. Of 541 patients, 367 experienced a first peritonitis episode within a median time of 12 months after the start of PD. Of these, 92 peritonitis episodes were preceded and followed by a SPA within one year. Forty-five patients without peritonitis were included in the control group. Logistic reasons (peritonitis group: 48% vs control group: 83%) and switch to hemodialysis (peritonitis group: 22% vs control group: 3%) were the main causes of missing SPA data post-peritonitis and post-control. When comparing the slopes of peritoneal transport parameters in the peritonitis group and the control group, a first peritonitis episode was associated with faster small solute transport (glucose absorption, p = 0.03) and a concomitant lower TCUFR (p = 0.03). In addition, a discreet decrease in macromolecular transport was seen in the peritonitis group: mean difference in post- and pre-peritonitis values: IgG: -8 μL/min (p = 0.01), a2m: -4 μL/min (p = 0.02), albumin: -10 μL/min (p = 0.04). Accordingly, the RC to macromolecules increased after peritonitis: 0.09, p = 0.04. The very first peritonitis episode alters the natural course of peritoneal membrane characteristics. The most likely explanation might be that cured peritoneal infection later causes long-lasting alterations in peritoneal transport stat

The Association Between Glucose Exposure and the Risk of Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

♦ Little or no clinical evidence is available on the association between glucose exposure and peritoneal host defense in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The objective of the present study was to quantify the exposure to glucose during the first year on PD and investigate the association with subsequent peritonitis. ♦ We analyzed prospectively collected demographic and peritonitis data from incident adult PD patients between 1990 and 2010. For the present study, we conducted a review of both in- and outpatient medical records of all patients to obtain their day-to-day dialysis schemes during the first year on PD. From these data, the average exposure to glucose was quantified. The exposure was stratified into low- and high-glucose groups based on the median, analyzed per standard deviation and in quartiles. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for the association between glucose exposure and peritonitis. Adjustments were made for age, sex, primary kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, Davies comorbidity score and the treatment period. ♦ In total, 230 patients were included in the study of whom 151 (66%) experienced a first peritonitis episode. The median follow-up time was 2.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.9 - 3.8) in the low-glucose group and 3.1 (IQR: 2.1 - 4.2) in the high-glucose group. After adjustment for confounding factors, no association between high glucose exposure and the risk of peritonitis was found (HR: 0.81; 0.55 - 1.17). No association was present when glucose exposure was analyzed per standard deviation (SD) (HR: 0.98; 0.79 - 1.21) or patient quartiles were applied. No association was identified between glucose exposure and severe peritonitis, Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis, or a peritonitis episode that lasted more than 14 days. ♦ Exposure to glucose is not associated with an increased risk of peritonitis. The equilibrium between glycemic harm to peritoneal host defense and detrimental effects of glucose on invading microorganisms may determine the susceptibility to peritoneal infectio

The Mutual Relationship Between Peritonitis and Peritoneal Transport

♦ Preservation of the peritoneum is required for long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). We investigated the effect of multiple peritonitis episodes on peritoneal transport. ♦ Prospectively collected data from 479 incident PD patients treated between 1990 and 2010 were analyzed, using strict inclusion criteria: follow-up of at least 3 years with the availability of a Standard Peritoneal Permeability Analysis (SPA) in the first year after start of PD and within the third year of PD, without peritonitis preceding the first SPA. For the purpose of the study, we only included patients who remained peritonitis-free (n = 28) or who experienced 3 or more peritonitis episodes (n = 16). ♦ At baseline the groups were similar with regard to small solute and fluid transport. However, the frequent peritonitis group had lower peritoneal protein clearances compared to the no peritonitis group, resulting in lower dialysate concentrations of proteins: albumin 196.5 mg/L vs 372.5 mg/L, IgG 36.4 mg/L vs 65.0 mg/L, and α-2-macroglobulin (A2M) 1.9 mg/L vs 3.6 mg/L, p <0.01. No differences in serum concentrations were present. A comparison between the transport slopes over time in both groups showed a positive time trend of mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC) creatinine (p = 0.03) and glucose absorption (p = 0.09) and a negative trend of transcapillary ultrafiltration (p = 0.06), when compared to the no peritonitis group. Frequent peritonitis did not affect free water transport. ♦ Slow initial peritoneal transport rates of serum proteins result in lower dialysate concentrations, and likely a lower opsonic activity, which is a risk factor for peritonitis. Patients with frequent peritonitis show an increase in small solute transport and a concomitant decrease of ultrafiltration. In long-term peritonitis-free PD patients, small solute transport decreased, while ultrafiltration increased. This suggests that frequent peritonitis leads to an increase of the vascular peritoneal surface area without all the structural membrane alterations that may develop after long-term P

Do low GDP neutral pH solutions prevent or retard peritoneal membrane alterations in long-term peritoneal dialysis?

Several studies have been published in the last decade on the effects of low glucose degradation product (GDP) neutral pH (L-GDP/N-pH) dialysis solutions on peritoneal morphology and function during the long-term PD treatment. Compared to conventional solutions, the impact of these solutions on the morphological and functional alterations of the peritoneal membrane is discussed, including those of effluent proteins that reflect the status of peritoneal tissues. Long-term PD with conventional solutions is associated with the loss of mesothelium, submesothelial and interstitial fibrosis, vasculopathy, and deposition of advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs). L-GDP/N-pH solutions mitigate these alterations, although vasculopathy and AGE deposition are still present. Increased vascular density was found in some studies. Small solute transport increases with PD duration on conventional solutions. Initially, higher values are present on L-GDP/N-pH treatment, but these may be reversible and remain stable with PD duration. Consequently, ultrafiltration (UF) is lower initially but remains stable thereafter. At 5 years, UF and small pore fluid transport are higher, while free water transport decreased only slightly during follow-up. Cancer antigen 125 was initially higher on L-GDP/N-pH solutions, suggesting better mesothelial preservation but decreased during follow-up. Therefore, L-GDP/N-pH solutions may not prevent but reduce and retard the peritoneal alterations induced by continuous exposure to glucose-based dialysis fluids

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) argue against the limited use of peritoneal dialysis in end-stage renal disease

Aim: Approximately 40% of dialysis patients are durably treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) in our teaching hospital. Patients' perspectives were studied by patientreported outcome measurements (PROMs) to find possible explanations for why the generally- reported decline in the use of PD hardly occurred in our facility. Materials and methods: All 75 prevalent adult dialysis patients hemodialysis (HD) duration 27, PD 16 months) were included. All had received predialysis care and education for > 6 month. Crosssectional sociodemographic and clinical data, SF-36, KDQOL-SF, and predialysis anxiety/ depression scores were collected in February 2016. Differences in PROMs between PD and HD patients were analyzed. Results: Despite more comorbidity in the PD population, generally-used dialysis parameters were adequate and similar between HD (n = 42) and PD (n = 33) patients as was annual mortality. Many factors associated with a predialysis modality choice for PD were absent. A higher anxiety/depression score was found in pre-HD compared to pre-PD patients. PROMs were returned by 97%. PD patients performed better on a number of PROMs than their HD counterparts. Conclusion: This single-center cross-section with a modest number of patients but an almost 100% patient response shows that having 40% of patients on PD is possible with excellent results in terms of patient- reported outcomes. A structured patient education with attention to personal needs of patients, an adequate infrastructure for PD, and a dedicated team with ongoing patient support are key factors. Sharing best practices may help to slow down or even reverse the decline of PD, which is a pity both for patients and society