Training, efficiency and ergonomics in minimally invasive surgery

Knoopsgatchirurgie (laparoscopie) heeft een aantal bewezen voordelen voor de patiënt. Voor het operatieteam gaat er een aantal uitdagingen gemoeid met deze manier van opereren. Met name op het gebied van de ergonomie en de efficiëntie van het operatieproces en op het gebied van training van chirurgen die deze techniek willen toepassen zijn verbeteringen nodig. Hierover gaat dit proefschrift. In deel 1 van dit proefschrift onderzoeken we wat de beste houding is om laparoscopische chirurgie te kunnen uitvoeren. Met name de positie van de monitor is daarbij van belang. De monitor dient ruim onder ooghoogte, dicht bij het operatieveld en in lijn met de werkrichting van de chirurg geplaatst te worden. We tonen aan dat een speciaal voor laparoscopie ontworpen operatiekamer een significante verbetering van de ergonomie en een verbeterde efficiëntie tussen de operaties door kan opleveren. In deel 2 van dit proefschrift onderzoeken we een nieuwe manier van proceduretraining op de operatiekamer. Een cohort assistenten doorloopt een curriculum voor laparoscopische galblaasoperaties. Nadat zij hun basisvaardigheden hebben geleerd op een simulator begonnen ze met proceduretraining op de operatiekamer. Gedurende 6 operaties kregen ze tijdens elke ingreep herhaaldelijk korte video-instructies over de volgende stap die moest worden uitgevoerd. Na het zien van de instructie mochten ze die stap van de operatie uitvoeren. De beoordelingen van de assistenten die op deze manier zijn getraind verbeterden sneller dan in een controle groep. We tonen aan dat deze methode effectief en uniform is terwijl de efficiëntie van het operatieproces niet benadeeld wordt

Dacron or ePTFE for Femoro-popliteal above-knee bypass grafting:short and long-term results of a multicentre randomised trial

AbstractObjectivesTo compare expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) prosthesis and collagen-impregnated knitted polyester (Dacron) for above-knee (AK) femoro-popliteal bypass grafts.DesignA prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial.Patients and MethodsBetween 1992 and 1996, 228 AK femoro-popliteal bypass grafts were randomly allocated to either an ePTFE (n=114) or a Dacron (n=114) vascular graft (6mm in diameter). Patients were eligible for inclusion if presenting with disabling claudication, rest pain or tissue loss.Follow-up was performed and included clinical examination and duplex ultrasonography at all scheduled intervals. All patients were treated with warfarin.The main end-point of this study was primary patency of the bypass graft at 2, 5 and 10 years after implantation. Secondary end-points were mortality, primary assisted patency and secondary patency. Cumulative patency rates were calculated with life-table analysis and with log-rank test.ResultsAfter 5 years, the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates were 36% (confidence interval (CI): 26–46%), 46% (CI: 36–56%) and 51% (CI: 41–61%) for ePTFE and 52% (CI: 42–62%) (p=0.04), 66% (CI: 56–76%) (p=0.01) and 70% (CI: 60–80%) (p=0.01) for Dacron, respectively. After ten years these rates were respectively 28% (CI:18-38%), 31% (CI:19-43%) and 35% (CI: 23-47%) for ePTFE and 28% (CI: 18-38%), 49% (CI: 37-61%) and 49% (CI: 37-61%) for Dacron.ConclusionDuring prolonged follow-up (10 years), Dacron femoro-popliteal bypass grafts have superior patency compared to those of ePTFE grafts. Dacron is the graft material of choice if the saphenous vein is not available

The Need for Objective Physical Activity Measurements in Routine Bariatric Care

PURPOSE: This study aims to (1) quantify physical behavior through self-reports and sensor-based measures, (2) examine the correlation between self-reported and sensor-based physical activity (PA) and (3) assess whether bariatric patients adhere to PA guidelines. METHODS: A Fitbit accelerometer was used to collect minute-to-minute step count and heart rate data for 14 consecutive days. Total physical activity levels (PAL), moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behavior (SB) were used to quantify physical behavior. Self-reported PA was assessed with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). To analyze the association between sensor-based and self-reported PA, Spearman’s correlation was used. A minimum of 150 MVPA minutes per week was considered as compliance with the PA guidelines. RESULTS: Fitbit data of 37 pre- and 18 post-surgery patients was analyzed. Participants averaged 7403 ± 3243 steps/day and spent most of their time sedentary (832 min, IQR: 749 – 879), especially in prolonged periods of ≥ 30 min (525, IQR: 419 – 641). Median MVPA time was 5.6 min/day (IQR: 1.7 – 10.6). Correlations between self-reported and sensor-based MVPA and SB were respectively 0.072 and 0.455. Only 17.1% was objectively adherent to MVPA guidelines ≥ 150 min/week, while 94.3% met the guidelines in case of self-reports. CONCLUSION: PA quantification confirmed that bariatric patients are highly sedentary and rarely engage in MVPA, despite a relatively high daily step count. Moreover, bariatric patients are not able to assess MVPA and moderately their SB by self-reports. Our results indicate the need for sensor-based PA monitoring in routine bariatric care. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-06165-y

Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery:a systematic review of available instruments

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has become the golden standard for many procedures, requiring new skills and training methods. The aim of this review is to appraise literature on assessment methods for laparoscopic colorectal procedures and quantify these methods for implementation in surgical training. Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched in October 2022 for studies reporting learning and assessment methods for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Quality was scored using the Downs and Black checklist. Included articles were categorized in procedure-based assessment methods and non-procedure-based assessment methods. A second distinction was made between capability for formative and/or summative assessment. Results: In this systematic review, nineteen studies were included. These studies showed large heterogeneity despite categorization. Median quality score was 15 (range 0–26). Fourteen studies were categorized as procedure-based assessment methods (PBA), and five as non-procedure-based assessment methods. Three studies were applicable for summative assessment. Conclusions: The results show a considerable diversity in assessment methods with varying quality and suitability. To prevent a sprawl of assessment methods, we argue for selection and development of available high-quality assessment methods. A procedure-based structure combined with an objective assessment scale and possibility for summative assessment should be cornerstones.</p

Risk-Assessment of Esophageal Surgery:Diagnosis and Treatment of Celiac Trunk Stenosis

Anastomotic leakage of the gastric conduit following surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is a life-threatening complication. An important risk factor associated with anastomotic leakage is calcification of the supplying arteries of the gastric conduit. The patency of calcified splanchnic arteries cannot be assessed on routine computed tomography (CT) scans for esophageal cancer and, as such, in selected patients with known or assumed mesenteric artery disease, additional CT angiography of the abdominal arteries with 1mm slices is strongly encouraged. If the mesenteric perfusion is compromised in patients with resectable esophageal cancer, angioplasty procedures with stenting of the mesenteric arteries could be performed to prevent possible ischemia of the gastric conduit

Assessment of Contraceptive Counseling and Contraceptive Use in Women After Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND: Reproductive-aged women are, according to American and European guidelines, recommended to avoid pregnancy for 12-24 months after bariatric surgery. Oral contraceptives may have suboptimal efficacy after malabsorptive bariatric procedures. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess contraceptive use pre- and postoperatively in women who underwent bariatric surgery in two obesity clinics in The Netherlands. Also, the recall of contraceptive and pregnancy counseling was investigated. METHODS: A validated questionnaire was performed among women aged 18-45 years who underwent bariatric surgery from October 2017 through August 2018. RESULTS: In total, 230 women were eligible for final analysis. Postoperatively, 60% used safe contraception, 16.1% unsafe contraception, and 23.9% no contraception. In this study, 43.7% of women using a potential unsafe contraceptive method preoperatively switched to a safe method of contraception postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Only 62.6% of women confirmed to have received contraceptive counseling, mainly preoperatively. The odds ratio for receiving contraceptive counseling and using safe contraceptive methods compared with not receiving contraceptive counseling was 2.20 (95% CI, 1.27-3.79; p = 0.005). Eighty-three percent confirmed that they have received counseling regarding delaying a pregnancy, and 52.6% were familiar with the recommendation to avoid a pregnancy for 24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 60% of women are using safe contraception postoperatively. Contraceptive counseling is suboptimal as 62.6% recall receiving counseling. Those who confirmed receiving counseling were more likely to use safe contraception after bariatric surgery. More counseling and monitoring in the postoperative and in the outpatient setting is recommended