Tailored therapy in type 2 diabetes:unintended effects of glucose-lowering agents

The clinical treatment landscape of type 2 diabetes has rapidly evolved over the last decades. With the arrival of several new treatment options, the possibility of tailored therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes has become an option. This thesis investigated several advantages and disadvantages of the treatment options. Some of the results contradict with the Dutch treatment guideline, e.g. gliclazide does not seem to better than other sulphonylureas with regard to some important outcomes and there might be role for thiazolidinedionen in the treatment of selected patients. This underlines the importance of tailored therapy. However, this thesis also showed that implementation of tailored therapy is difficult and that there is room for improvement in guidelines and among prescribers

Thiazolidinediones and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cohort Study

Background and Aims: Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are potential pharmacological treatment options for patients at risk of NAFLD. Therefore, we examined the association between the risk of NAFLD and the use of TZDs and GLP-1 receptor agonists compared with the use of sulfonylureas (SUs) and insulins. Additionally, we calculated the incidence of HCC in users of TZDs and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Approach and Results: We conducted a population-based cohort study using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database (2007-2018). All patients aged ≥18 with a prescription of an oral glucose-lowering agent or GLP-1 receptor agonist were included. The first prescription defined the start of follow-up. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of NAFLD. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs of the primary outcome. Incidence rates of HCC were determined per 1,000 person-years for all exposures. The study identified 207,367 adults with a prescription for a glucose-lowering agent. The risk of NAFLD was lower in patients prescribed a TZD than in those prescribed an SU (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.51). No difference in risk of NAFLD was observed comparing GLP-1 receptor agonist use with insulin use (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.91-1.63). Conclusions: Results of our study endorse the use of TZDs for selected patients at risk of NAFLD but do not support previous findings regarding the beneficial effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists. The low number of events in several subgroups may affect the generalizability of the current findings

Determinants of treatment modification before and after implementation of the updated 2015 NICE guideline on type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS: To identify patient-specific factors associated with early metformin treatment modification among type 2 diabetes patients before and after implementation of the updated 2015 NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) guideline. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (2009-2016). Patients ≥18 years, newly treated with metformin only, during the period of valid data collection were included. The first prescription defined start of follow-up. Determinants of treatment modification in two cohorts (before and after implementation of the updated guideline) were studied by time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: After implementation of the updated guideline, patients were less likely to receive sulphonylureas (62.3% vs 41.3%) or thiazolidediones (4.7% vs 2.2%) and more likely to receive dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (15.8% vs 27.1%) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (0.8% vs 9.9%). Some determinants influenced general practitioners' prescribing differently after implementation of the updated guideline compared to before, including a high body mass index and heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a first step towards tailored prescribing has been made. However, not all determinants that are important to consider when prescribing second-line glucose lowering agents were of influence on general practitioners' prescribing