Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar tissue. Interventions: Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. Outcome measures: Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. Results: The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (p = 0.012), pruritus (p < 0.001), pigmentation (p = 0.010), pliability (p < 0.001), surface area (p < 0.001), and thickness (p = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). Conclusions: Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue

Reproducibility of postural control measurement during unstable sitting in low back pain patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Postural control tests like standing and sitting stabilometry are widely used to evaluate neuromuscular control related to trunk balance in low back pain patients. Chronic low back pain patients have lesser postural control compared to healthy subjects. Few studies have assessed the reproducibility of the centre of pressure deviations and to our knowledge no studies have investigated the reproducibility of three-dimensional kinematics of postural control tests in a low back pain population. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reproducibility of a seated postural control test in low back pain patients.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Postural control in low back pain patients was registered by a three dimensional motion analysis system combined with a force plate. Sixteen chronic low back pain patients having complaints for at least six months, were included based on specific clinical criteria. Every subject performed 4 postural control tests. Every test was repeated 4 times and lasted 40 seconds. The force plate registered the deviations of the centre of pressure. A Vicon-612-datastation, equipped with 7 infra-red M1 camera's, was used to track 13 markers attached to the torso and pelvis in order to estimate their angular displacement in the 3 cardinal planes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) calculated for the force plate variables did not exceed 0.73 (ranging between 0.11 and 0.73). As for the torso, ICC's of the mean flexion-extension and rotation angles ranged from 0.65 to 0.93 and of the mean lateral flexion angle from 0.50 to 0.67. For the pelvis the ICC of the mean flexion-extension angle varied between 0.66 and 0.83, the mean lateral flexion angle between 0.16 and 0.81 and the mean rotation angle between 0.40 and 0.62.</p> <p>Consecutive data suggest that the low test-retest reproducibility is probably due to a learning effect.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The test-retest reproducibility of these postural control tests in an unstable sitting position can globally be considered as rather moderate. In order to improve the test-retest reproducibility, a learning period may be advisable at the beginning of the test.</p

Resting energy expenditure, body composition, and metabolic alterations in breast cancer survivors vs. healthy controls: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to investigate the difference in absolute and fat free mass (FFM)-adjusted resting energy expenditure (mREE) and body composition (body weight, fat mass (FM), FFM) between breast cancer survivors (BCs) and controls. Correlations with body composition were analyzed. We examined if survival year, or being metabolically dysfunctional were predictive variables. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 32 BCs ≤5 years post treatment and 36 healthy controls. Indirect calorimetry measured absolute mREE. Body composition was determined by BOD POD. FFM-adjusted mREE was calculated (mREE/FFM). The Harris-Benedict equation was used to predict REE and determine hyper−/hypometabolism (mREE/pREE). The database of the multidisciplinary breast clinic of the University Hospital of Antwerp was consulted for survival year and metabolic dysfunctions. Results BCs have similar absolute mREE and greater FFM-adjusted mREE compared to controls. Absolute mREE and body composition between BCs differed; adjusted mREE was similar. FFM correlated significantly with absolute mREE in BCs. A significant interaction term was found between survival year and FM for absolute mREE. Conclusion BCs have similar absolute mREE, but higher FFM-adjusted mREE. Differences in body composition between BCs are suggested to cause inter-individual variations. We suggest that increased FFM-adjusted mREE is caused by metabolic stress related to cancer/treatment. Accurate measurement of REE and body composition is advised when adapting nutritional strategies, especially in patients at risk for developing metabolic dysfunctions

Comparison of energy expenditure measurements by a new basic respiratory room vs. classical ventilated hood

Abstract Background Nutritional support is often based on predicted resting energy expenditure (REE). In patients, predictions seem invalid. Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard for measuring EE. For assessments over longer periods (up to days), room calorimeters are used. Their design makes their use cumbersome, and warrants improvements to increase utility. Current study aims to compare data on momentary EE, obtained by a basic respiration room vs. classical ventilated hood. The objective is to compare results of the basic room and to determine its 1)reliability for measuring EE and 2)sensitivity for minute changes in activity. Methods Two protocols (P1; P2)(n = 62; 25 men/37 women) were applied. When measured by hood, participants in both protocols were in complete rest (supine position). When assessed by room, participants in P1 were instructed to stay half-seated while performing light desk work; in P2 participants were in complete rest mimicking hood conditions. The Omnical calorimeter operated both modalities. Following data were collected/calculated: Oxygen uptake ( $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2(ml/min)), carbon dioxide production ( $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ CO2ml/min), 24h_EE (kcal/min), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Statistical analyses were done between modalities and between protocols. The agreement between 24h_EE, $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2 and $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ CO2 obtained by both modalities was investigated by linear regression. Reliability analysis on 24h_EE determined ICC. Results No significant differences were found for 24h_EE and $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ O2. $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ CO2 significantly differed in P1 + P2, and P2 (hood > room). RER was significantly different (hood > room) for P1 + P2 and both protocols individually. Reliability of 24h_EE between modalities was high. Modality-specific results were not different between protocols. Discussion/conclusion The room is valid for assessing momentary EE. Minute changes in activity lead to a non-significant increase in EE and significant increase in RER. The significant difference in $$\dot{\mathrm{V}}$$ V ˙ CO2 for hood might be related to perceived comfort. More research is necessary on determinants of RER, type (intensity) of activity, and restlessness. The design of the room facilitates metabolic measurements in research, with promising results for future clinical use

Comparison of energy expenditure measurements by a new basic respiratory room vs. classical ventilated hood

Abstract: Background Nutritional support is often based on predicted resting energy expenditure (REE). In patients, predictions seem invalid. Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard for measuring EE. For assessments over longer periods (up to days), room calorimeters are used. Their design makes their use cumbersome, and warrants improvements to increase utility. Current study aims to compare data on momentary EE, obtained by a basic respiration room vs. classical ventilated hood. The objective is to compare results of the basic room and to determine its 1)reliability for measuring EE and 2)sensitivity for minute changes in activity. Methods Two protocols (P1; P2)(n\u2009=\u200962; 25 men/37 women) were applied. When measured by hood, participants in both protocols were in complete rest (supine position). When assessed by room, participants in P1 were instructed to stay half-seated while performing light desk work; in P2 participants were in complete rest mimicking hood conditions. The Omnical calorimeter operated both modalities. Following data were collected/calculated: Oxygen uptake ( O2(ml/min)), carbon dioxide production ( CO2ml/min), 24h_EE (kcal/min), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER). Statistical analyses were done between modalities and between protocols. The agreement between 24h_EE, O2 and CO2 obtained by both modalities was investigated by linear regression. Reliability analysis on 24h_EE determined ICC. Results No significant differences were found for 24h_EE and O2. CO2 significantly differed in P1\u2009+\u2009P2, and P2 (hood\u2009>\u2009room). RER was significantly different (hood\u2009>\u2009room) for P1\u2009+\u2009P2 and both protocols individually. Reliability of 24h_EE between modalities was high. Modality-specific results were not different between protocols. Discussion/conclusion The room is valid for assessing momentary EE. Minute changes in activity lead to a non-significant increase in EE and significant increase in RER. The significant difference in CO2 for hood might be related to perceived comfort. More research is necessary on determinants of RER, type (intensity) of activity, and restlessness. The design of the room facilitates metabolic measurements in research, with promising results for future clinical use

Resting energy expenditure, body composition, and metabolic alterations in breast cancer survivors vs. healthy controls : a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Purpose This study aimed to investigate the difference in absolute and fat free mass (FFM)-adjusted resting energy expenditure (mREE) and body composition (body weight, fat mass (FM), FFM) between breast cancer survivors (BCs) and controls. Correlations with body composition were analyzed. We examined if survival year, or being metabolically dysfunctional were predictive variables. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 32 BCs 645 years post treatment and 36 healthy controls. Indirect calorimetry measured absolute mREE. Body composition was determined by BOD POD. FFM-adjusted mREE was calculated (mREE/FFM). The Harris-Benedict equation was used to predict REE and determine hyper 12/hypometabolism (mREE/pREE). The database of the multidisciplinary breast clinic of the University Hospital of Antwerp was consulted for survival year and metabolic dysfunctions. Results BCs have similar absolute mREE and greater FFM-adjusted mREE compared to controls. Absolute mREE and body composition between BCs differed; adjusted mREE was similar. FFM correlated significantly with absolute mREE in BCs. A significant interaction term was found between survival year and FM for absolute mREE. Conclusion BCs have similar absolute mREE, but higher FFM-adjusted mREE. Differences in body composition between BCs are suggested to cause inter-individual variations. We suggest that increased FFM-adjusted mREE is caused by metabolic stress related to cancer/treatment. Accurate measurement of REE and body composition is advised when adapting nutritional strategies, especially in patients at risk for developing metabolic dysfunctions