Effects of time and temperature on 48 routine chemistry, haematology and coagulation analytes in whole blood samples

Background: Phlebotomy for the purpose of blood analysis is often performed at remote locations, and samples are usually temporarily stored before transport to a central laboratory for analysis. The circumstances during storage and shipment may not meet the necessary requirements. If analysed anyway, false results may be generated. We therefore examined the influence of precentrifugation time and temperature of the most frequently requested tests in whole blood. Methods: Healthy volunteers donated blood in which 48 analytes were tested. Routine chemistry was performed in lithium heparin tubes, haematology in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes, coagulation in citrate tubes and glucose in sodium fluoride tubes. One tube was measured directly. The others were kept at different temperatures (4, 8, 20 or 30℃) and stored for 4, 6, 8 or 24 h before analysis. Additionally, some analytes were examined at 12, 16, 24 and 28℃. The mean percentage deviation was compared with different decision levels, including the total allowable error. Results: When using the total allowable error as an acceptable limit, most of the investigated analytes remained stable. However, bicarbonate is unstable at almost all tested time-points and temperatures. Calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, potassium and sodium are particularly affected at low temperatures, while phosphate is mainly affected at and above room temperature after 8 h. Conclusion: We established the influence of time and temperature on a broad range of analytes, which may be applied to set the limits in transportation and storage of whole blood samples

Awareness of drug laboratory test interactions is important for prevention of unnecessary additional diagnostics: An example

Background: Elevated levels of Chromogranin A (CgA) may be indicative of a neuroendocrine tumour (NET), but increased levels are also observed after intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The incidence of diagnostic confusion because of this drug-laboratory test interaction (DLTI) was examined. Methods: Medical records of 238 patients with elevated CgA concentrations were obtained from three hospitals. The following data were extracted: PPI prescription at the time of CgA measurement, medical decision making based on elevated CgA concentrations, final diagnosis, comorbidity and other prescribed drugs. Results: From 238 patients with elevated CgA concentrations, 132 used PPIs. Of these patients, 57 patients did not have a NET. In 9 of these 57 patients (16%), diagnostic work up revealed no medical cause of an elevated CgA concentration. Somatostatin receptor imaging was ordered in 4 out of 9 cases, with no abnormalities observed. In 6 out of 9 cases, CgA measurement was repeated after PPI discontinuation resulting in normalisation of CgA concentrations. Conclusion: In this retrospective patient record study we observed that part of the elevated CgA concentrations in patients could be caused by the usage of PPIs causing unnecessary diagnostic work-up for the exclusion of a NET. These observations illustrate the need for better DLTI awareness

Awareness of drug laboratory test interactions is important for prevention of unnecessary additional diagnostics: An example

Background: Elevated levels of Chromogranin A (CgA) may be indicative of a neuroendocrine tumour (NET), but increased levels are also observed after intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The incidence of diagnostic confusion because of this drug-laboratory test interaction (DLTI) was examined. Methods: Medical records of 238 patients with elevated CgA concentrations were obtained from three hospitals. The following data were extracted: PPI prescription at the time of CgA measurement, medical decision making based on elevated CgA concentrations, final diagnosis, comorbidity and other prescribed drugs. Results: From 238 patients with elevated CgA concentrations, 132 used PPIs. Of these patients, 57 patients did not have a NET. In 9 of these 57 patients (16%), diagnostic work up revealed no medical cause of an elevated CgA concentration. Somatostatin receptor imaging was ordered in 4 out of 9 cases, with no abnormalities observed. In 6 out of 9 cases, CgA measurement was repeated after PPI discontinuation resulting in normalisation of CgA concentrations. Conclusion: In this retrospective patient record study we observed that part of the elevated CgA concentrations in patients could be caused by the usage of PPIs causing unnecessary diagnostic work-up for the exclusion of a NET. These observations illustrate the need for better DLTI awareness

Diagnostic error as a result of drug-laboratory test interactions

Background Knowledge of possible drug-laboratory test interactions (DLTIs) is important for the interpretation of laboratory test results. Test results may be affected by physiological or analytical drug effects. Failure to recognize these interactions may lead to misinterpretation of test results, a delayed or erroneous diagnosis or unnecessary extra tests or therapy, which may harm patients. Content Thousands of interactions have been reported in the literature, but are often fragmentarily described and some papers even reported contradictory findings. How can healthcare professionals become aware of all these possible interactions in their individual patients? DLTI decision support applications could be a good solution. In a literature search, only four relevant studies have been found on DLTI decision support applications in clinical practice. These studies show a potential benefit of automated DLTI messages to physicians for the interpretation of laboratory test results. All physicians reported that part of the DLTI messages were useful. In one study, 74% of physicians even sometimes refrained from further additional examination. Summary and outlook Unrecognized DLTIs potentially cause diagnostic errors in a large number of patients. Therefore, efforts to avoid these errors, for example with a DLTI decision support application, could tremendously improve patient outcome

Impact of interactions between drugs and laboratory test results on diagnostic test interpretation - a systematic review

Intake of drugs may influence the interpretation of laboratory test results. Knowledge and correct interpretation of possible drug-laboratory test interactions (DLTIs) is important for physicians, pharmacists and laboratory specialists. Laboratory results may be affected by analytical or physiological effects of medication. Failure to take into account the possible unintended influence of drug use on a laboratory test result may lead to incorrect diagnosis, incorrect treatment and unnecessary follow-up. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the literature investigating the clinical impact and use of DLTI decision support systems on laboratory test interpretation. Particular interactions were reported in a large number of articles, but they were fragmentarily described and some papers even reported contradictory findings. To provide an overview of information that clinicians and laboratory staff need to interpret test results, DLTI databases have been made by several groups. In a literature search, only four relevant studies have been found on DLTI decision support applications for laboratory test interpretation in clinical practice. These studies show a potential benefit of automated DLTI messages to physicians for the correct interpretation of laboratory test results. Physicians reported 30-100% usefulness of DLTI messages. In one study 74% of physicians sometimes even refrained from further additional examination. The benefit of decision support increases when a refined set of clinical rules is determined in cooperation with health care professionals. The prevalence of DLTIs is high in a broad range of combinations of laboratory tests and drugs and these frequently remain unrecognized

Real-time monitoring of drug laboratory test interactions: A proof of concept

For the correct interpretation of test results, it is important to be aware of drug-laboratory test interactions (DLTIs). If DLTIs are not taken into account by clinicians, erroneous interpretation of test results may lead to a delayed or incorrect diagnosis, unnecessary diagnostic testing or therapy with possible harm for patients. A DLTI alert accompanying a laboratory test result could be a solution. The aim of this study was to test a multicentre proof of concept of an electronic clinical decision support system (CDSS) for real-time monitoring of DLTIs. CDSS was implemented in three Dutch hospitals. So-called 'clinical rules' were programmed to alert medical specialists for possible DLTIs based on laboratory test results outside the reference range in combination with prescribed drugs. A selection of interactions from the DLTI database of the Dutch society of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine were integrated in 43 clinical rules, including 24 tests and 25 drugs. During the period of one month all generated DTLI alerts were registered in the laboratory information system. Approximately 65 DLTI alerts per day were detected in each hospital. Most DLTI alerts were generated in patients from the internal medicine and intensive care departments. The most frequently reported DLTI alerts were potassium-proton pump inhibitors (16%), potassium-beta blockers (11%) and creatine kinase-statins (11%). This study shows that it is possible to alert for potential DLTIs in real-time with a CDSS. The CDSS was successfully implemented in three hospitals. Further research must reveal its usefulness in clinical practice

Clinical usefulness of drug-laboratory test interaction alerts: A multicentre survey

Objectives: Knowledge of possible drug-laboratory test interactions (DLTIs) is important for the interpretation of laboratory test results. Failure to recognize these interactions may lead to misinterpretation, a delayed or erroneous diagnosis, or unnecessary extra diagnostic tests or therapy, which may harm patients. The aim of this multicentre survey was to evaluate the clinical value of DLTI alerts. Methods: A survey was designed with six predefined clinical cases selected from the clinical laboratory practice with a potential DLTI. Physicians from several departments, including internal medicine, cardiology, intensive care, surgery and geriatrics in six participating hospitals were recruited to fill in the survey. The survey addressed their knowledge of DLTIs, motivation to receive an alert and opinion on the potential influence on medical decision making. Results: A total of 210 physicians completed the survey. Of these respondents 93% had a positive attitude towards receiving DLTI alerts; however, the reported value differed per case and per respondent’s background. In each clinical case, medical decision making was influenced as a consequence of the reported DLTI message (ranging from 3 to 45% of respondents per case). Conclusions: In this multicentre survey, most physicians stated DLTI messages to be useful in laboratory test interpretation. Medical decision making was influenced by reporting DLTI alerts in each case. Alerts should be adjusted according to the needs and preferences of the receiving physicians