Investigating variation in replicability: A \u201cmany labs\u201d replication project.

Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of thirteen classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, ten effects replicated consistently. One effect \u2013 imagined contact reducing prejudice \u2013 showed weak support for replicability. And two effects \u2013 flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification \u2013 did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or U.S. versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect

Theory Building Through Replication. Response to Commentaries on the Many Labs Replication Project.

Every replication is different in innumerable ways from the original. Evaluating high-powered replication designs a priori provides an opportunity to examine whether the theory anticipates that any of these differences will matter. Then, the experimental result informs on the theory by either (a) supporting the theory\u2019s generalizability across these presumed, and now demonstrated, irrelevant conditions, or (b) challenging the present theoretical understanding by showing that the effect does not occur under presumed irrelevant conditions, or that it does occur under conditions thought to be not amenable to obtaining the result. Finally, exploratory analysis and post facto evaluation of the outcomes provides fodder for the next iteration of theoretical development and empirical evaluation. Direct replication enables iterative cycling to refine theory and subject it to empirical confrontatio