Rapid genotyping of the OATP1B1 polymorphisms A388G and T521C with real-time PCR FRET assays

The polymorphisms (OATP)1B1 A388G and T521C of the solute carrier organic anion-transporter family member 1B1 gene (SLCO1B1), previously known as OATP-C, have potential impacts on drug metabolism. In order to establish a fast and consistent assay for these polymorphisms, rapid speed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays on the LightCycler(R) were developed for both OATP1B1 polymorphisms. A locked nucleic acid (LNA) on the polymorphic location within the sensor probe was necessary to discriminate both alleles of the OATP1B1 T521C polymorphism. To confirm the reliability of both real-time PCR FRET assays, these new methods were validated by genotyping 120 samples using a PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay and an allele-specific PCR. The results of the real-time PCR FRET assays were completely in line with conventional PCR methods, indicating that the real-time PCR FRET assays are appropriate for clinical settings

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics: influence of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette B1 (ABCB1) and cytochrome (CYP) 3A polymorphisms

Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant used after organ transplantation, has a narrow therapeutic range and its pharmacokinetic variability complicates its daily dose assessment. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette B1 (ABCB1) and the cytochrome (CYP) 3A4 and 3A5 enzymes appears to play a role in the tacrolimus metabolism. In the present study, two different renal transplant recipient groups were used to examine the influence of ABCB1 and CYP3A polymorphisms on the daily tacrolimus dose and several pharmacokinetic parameters. In total 63 Caucasian renal transplant recipients divided into 26 early [median (range) of the days since transplantation - 16 (3-74)] and 37 late [median (range) of the days since transplantation - 1465 (453-4128)] post-transplant recipients were genotyped for ABCB1 and CYP3A polymorphisms. The pharmacokinetic parameters of tacrolimus were determined for all renal transplant recipients and correlated with their corresponding genotypes. A significant difference in allele frequencies of the CYP3A4*1B (P = 0.028) and CYP3A5*1 (P = 0.022) alleles was observed between the early and late post-transplant recipient groups. Significantly higher dose-normalized trough levels (dnC(0)), dose-normalized area under the curve (dnAUC(0-12)), and dose-normalized maximum concentration (dnC(max)) were observed for carriers of the CYP3A5*3 variant allele in both renal transplant patient groups. Except for the daily tacrolimus dose (P = 0.025) no significant differences were observed for carriers of the CYP3A4*1B variant allele. Neither the individual ABCB1 polymorphisms nor the ABCB1 haplotypes were associated with any pharmacokinetic parameter. We noticed that patients carrying a CYP3A5*1 allele require a twofold higher tacrolimus dose compared with homozygous carriers of the CYP3A5*3 variant allele to maintain the target dnAUC(0-12). Therefore, genotyping for the CYP3A5*3 variant allele can contribute to a better and more individualized immunosuppressive therapy in transplant patients

Genotyping with a dried blood spot method: a useful technique for application in pharmacogenetics

Several commercial DNA isolation kits are available for extracting the genomic DNA from the ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) whole blood samples. To obtain DNA from whole blood these DNA isolation procedures require quite some hands on time and are rather expensive. An alternative technique could be dried blood spot (DBS) sampling, with which DNA isolation is faster, cheaper and logistics are easier. We have developed a non-commercial DBS method and examined its performance in practice. DNA isolation from EDTA blood samples and made blood spots on filter paper from 106 renal transplant recipients were compared. Additionally, DNA isolation with a column method and two different DBS method was performed for 10 healthy volunteers and compared. Also DNA isolation with only capillary blood using both DBS methods from another 100 healthy volunteers has been investigated. Real-time PCR FRET assays for the CYP3A4 A-392G, CYP3A5 A6986G, ABCB1 C1236T, G2677T/A and C3435T polymorphisms were used and the melting curves of both DNA isolation methods were compared. In all cases DNA extracted with the column method corresponded completely with the results of the DNA isolated with the DBS procedure. Hence, DNA isolation from filter paper appears to be a useful alternative for the commercially available DNA isolation kits