Modified valve-sparing reimplantation technique for para-commissural coronary ostia

In some patients undergoing a valve-sparing reimplantation technique, a coronary ostium may be very close to one of the commissures. This condition jeopardizes the coronary ostium patency and valve reimplantation. The authors describe a simple and safe modification of the reimplantation technique, leaving the misplaced coronary ostium attached to the commissure

The Ross procedure in young adults: over 20 years of experience in our Institution†

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure in young adults in our institution. METHODS: All adult patients who received a Ross operation between 1991 and 2014 were included in the study. Survival analysis and regression analysis were performed. Survival of the Ross cohort was compared with the age-, gender- and calendar year-matched general population. RESULTS: Three hundred-and-six patients (mean age: 41.7 ± 9.7, male: 74.8%, bicuspid aortic valve: 58.5%, valve stenosis: 68%) were included in the analysis. There were 7 perioperative deaths (2.3%). Nine patients were lost to follow-up from hospital and completeness of the follow-up was 94%. The median follow-up of the remaining 290 patients was 10.6 years. There were 21 late deaths of which only 3 were valve-related. The overall survival at 15 years since surgery is 88 ± 3% that is comparable with the matched population. Freedom from valve-related deaths was 96.8 ± 2% at 16 years. Freedom from autograft and pulmonary homograft reoperation was 74.5 ± 4.3% at 16 years. Preoperative aortic regurgitation was the only significant predictor of autograft failure over time. Freedom from the combined end point of bleeding/thromboembolism/endocarditis/reoperation was 69.2 ± 4% at 16 years. Perioperative mortality following reoperation was 2.6% and the autograft could be spared in 72% of reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: The Ross operation in young adults is associated with an excellent survival in the long term that is comparable with the general population. Although there is a risk of reoperation, incidence of other valve-related events is very low. The use of pulmonary autograft should be considered in any young adult patient requiring aortic valve replacement

A New Simple and Objective Method for Graft Sizing in Valve-Sparing Root Replacement Using the Reimplantation Technique

The methods of graft sizing in valve-sparing surgery are criticized for their complexity and subjectivity in application. We propose a simple method for graft sizing in valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique. Practically, the height of the commissure between the noncoronary cusp and the left coronary cusp give the size of the graft. This new method of graft sizing was successfully applied in the last 27 consecutive patients with good immediate results. Graft sizing with this objective and reproducible simple method results in restoration of normal aortic valve geometry and function

Aortic valve repair with patch in non-rheumatic disease: indication, techniques and durability†

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the long-term outcomes of aortic valve (AV) repair with biological patch in patient with non-rheumatic valve disease. METHODS: From 1995 to 2011, 554 patients underwent elective (AV) repair; among them, 57 (mean age 45 ± 17 years) had cusp restoration using patch for non-rheumatic valve disease. Seven (12%) patients had unicuspid valve, 30 (53%) patients had bicuspid valve and 20 (35%) had tricuspid valve. Autologous pericardium was used in 26 patients (7 treated, 19 non-treated), bovine pericardium in 26, autologous tricuspid valve leaflet in 4 and aortic homograft cusp in 1. Patching was used to repair perforation (n = 20, 35%), commissural defect (n = 18, 32%), raphe repair (n = 17, 30%) or for cusp extension (n = 2, 3.5%). Echocardiographic and clinical follow-up was 98% complete and mean follow-up was 72 ± 42.5 months. RESULTS: No hospital mortality. At 8 years, overall survival was 90 ± 5% and freedom from valve-related death was 96 ± 3%. Two patients (3.5%) needed early reoperation for aortic regurgitation (AR); they underwent re-repair and the Ross procedure, respectively. Late reoperation was necessary in 9 patients (16%) for AR (n = 4), stenosis (n = 3) or mixed disease (n = 2). They had the Ross procedure (n = 6) or prosthetic valve replacement (n = 3) with no mortality. At 8 years, freedom from reoperation was 75 ± 9%. Freedom from reoperation was slightly higher in tricuspid compared with non-tricuspid valves (92 ± 7 vs 68 ± 11%, P = 0.18) and slightly higher for bovine (95 ± 5%) compared with autologous pericardium (73 ± 11%, P = 0.38), but differences were statistically not significant. In tricuspid valves, freedom from reoperation was higher in perforation repair compared with other techniques (100 vs 50 ± 35%, P = 0.02). In bicuspid valves, freedom from reoperation was similar between different repair techniques (P = 0.38). Late echocardiography showed AR 0-1 in 30 (53%) patients, AR 2 in 12 (21%) and no AR ≥ 3. Three patients presented a mean transvalvular gradient of 30-40 mmHg. Thromboembolic events occurred in 2 patients (0.6%/patient-year), bleeding events in 1 (0.3% /patient-year) and no endocarditis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: AV repair with biological patch is feasible for various aetiologies. The techniques are safe and medium-term durability is acceptable, even excellent for perforation repair in tricuspid valve morphology. Bovine pericardium is a good alternative to autologous pericardium

The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair†

OBJECTIVES: Valve sparing reimplantation can improve the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair compared with subcommissural annuloplasty, especially in patients with a large basal ring. This study analyses the effect of basal ring size and annuloplasty on valve repair in the setting of a tricuspid aortic valve. METHODS: From 1995 to 2013, 382 patients underwent elective tricuspid aortic valve repair. We included only those undergoing subcommissural annuloplasty, valve sparing reimplantation or no annuloplasty and in whom intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography images were available for retrospective pre- and post-repair basal ring measurements (n = 323, subcommissural annuloplasty: 146, valve sparing reimplantation: 154, no annuloplasty: 23). In a subgroup of patients with available echocardiographic images, basal ring was retrospectively measured at the latest follow-up or prior to reoperation. subcommissural annuloplasty and valve sparing reimplantation were compared after matching for degree of aortic regurgitation and root size. RESULTS: All three groups differed significantly for most of preoperative characteristics. Hospital mortality was 0.9%. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. At 8 years, overall survival was 80 ± 5%. Freedom from reoperation and freedom from aortic regurgitation >1+ were 92 ± 5% and 71 ± 8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, predictors of aortic regurgitation >1+ were left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = 0.003), cusp repair (P = 0.006), body surface area (P = 0.01) and subcommissural annuloplasty (P = 0.05). In subcommissural annuloplasty, freedom from aortic regurgitation >1+ was lower for patients with basal ring ≥28 mm compared with patients with basal ring 1+ was independent of basal ring size (P = 0.38). In matched comparison between subcommissural annuloplasty and valve sparing reimplantation, freedom from aortic regurgitation >1+ was not significantly different (P = 0.06), but in patients with basal ring ≥28 mm, valve sparing reimplantation was superior to subcommissural annuloplasty (P = 0.04). Despite similar intraoperative reduction in basal ring size in subcommissural annuloplasty and valve sparing reimplantation, patients with subcommissural annuloplasty exhibited greater increase in basal ring size during the follow-up compared with the valve sparing reimplantation group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As with a bicuspid aortic valve, a large basal ring predicts recurrence of aortic regurgitation in patients with tricuspid aortic valve undergoing repair with the subcommissural annuloplasty technique. This recurrence is caused by basal ring dilatation over time after subcommissural annuloplasty. With the valve sparing reimplantation technique, large basal ring did not predict aortic regurgitation recurrence, as prosthetic-based circumferential annuloplasty displayed better stability over time. Stable circumferential annuloplasty is recommended in tricuspid aortic valve repair whenever the basal ring size is ≥28 mm

Summary: International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes.

peer reviewedThis International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes

International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes.

peer reviewedThis International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes