7 research outputs found

    Characterisation of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms from clinical specimens in Yola, Nigeria

    Get PDF
    Objectives: This study aimed to identify carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from clinical specimens of patients in Yola, Nigeria. Methods: Routine clinical specimens were screened for the presence of carbapenem-resistant Gramnegative bacteria using chromogenic agar plates. Susceptibility of all presumptive isolates to carbapenems was tested by MIC and disk diffusion methods. Real-time PCR was used to test for the presence of carbapenemase genes. Results: Screening of 1741 clinical specimens yielded 119 (6.8%) presumptive carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing confirmed carbapenem resistance in 105 of these isolates. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (blaNDM) gene was detected in 26 isolates and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (blaVIM) gene was detected in four. The mechanism of resistance could not be identified in approximately two thirds of the carbapenem-resistant isolates. Conclusion: While blaNDM and blaVIM accounted for 28.6% of the resistance seen, further molecular-based studies are needed to characterise the other mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in these isolates

    Does the Presence of Multiple β-Lactamases in Gram-Negative Bacilli Impact the Results of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase and Carbapenemase Confirmation Methods?

    Get PDF
    Objectives: Many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) harbour multiple β-lactamases. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of multiple β-lactamase carriage on the accuracy of susceptibility tests and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase confirmation methods. Methods: A total of 50 MDR-GNB, of which 29 carried multiple β-lactamases, underwent broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) testing as well as confirmation tests for ESBLs and carbapenemases. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used for β-lactamase gene identification. Results: Categorical agreement of BMD and DD testing results ranged from 86.5 to 97.7% for 10 β-lactam agents. BMD and DD algorithms for ESBL detection were highly variable; 6 of 8 positive strains carried an ESBL plus a carbapenemase or an AmpC enzyme, which may confound antimicrobial selection. The sensitivity and specificity of the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) were both 100%, whilst mCIM and EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM) when used together to differentiate serine from metallo-β-lactamase carriage were both 96%. Xpert® Carba-R results (in vitro diagnostic test) were consistent with WGS results. Predicting phenotypic carbapenem resistance from WGS data overall showed 100% specificity but only 66.7% sensitivity for Enterobacterales isolates that were non-susceptible to imipenem and meropenem. Conclusions: Multiple β-lactamases in MDR-GNB does not impact DD results, the utility of mCIM/eCIM tests, or Xpert Carba-R results. However, ESBL algorithms produced inconsistent results and predicting carbapenem resistance from WGS data was problematic in such strains

    Does the presence of multiple β-lactamases in Gram-negative bacilli impact the results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests and extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase confirmation methods?

    Get PDF
    Objectives: Many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) harbour multiple β-lactamases. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of multiple β-lactamase carriage on the accuracy of susceptibility tests and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase confirmation methods. Methods: A total of 50 MDR-GNB, of which 29 carried multiple β-lactamases, underwent broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) testing as well as confirmation tests for ESBLs and carbapenemases. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used for β-lactamase gene identification. Results: Categorical agreement of BMD and DD testing results ranged from 86.5 to 97.7% for 10 β-lactam agents. BMD and DD algorithms for ESBL detection were highly variable; 6 of 8 positive strains carried an ESBL plus a carbapenemase or an AmpC enzyme, which may confound antimicrobial selection. The sensitivity and specificity of the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) were both 100%, whilst mCIM and EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM) when used together to differentiate serine from metallo-β-lactamase carriage were both 96%. Xpert® Carba-R results (in vitro diagnostic test) were consistent with WGS results. Predicting phenotypic carbapenem resistance from WGS data overall showed 100% specificity but only 66.7% sensitivity for Enterobacterales isolates that were non-susceptible to imipenem and meropenem. Conclusions: Multiple β-lactamases in MDR-GNB does not impact DD results, the utility of mCIM/eCIM tests, or Xpert Carba-R results. However, ESBL algorithms produced inconsistent results and predicting carbapenem resistance from WGS data was problematic in such strains

    Evaluation of the Xpert Carba-R Nxg Assay for Detection of Carbapenemase Genes in a Global Challenge Set of \u3cem\u3ePseudomonas aeruginosa \u3c/em\u3e Isolates

    Get PDF
    The growing prevalence and diversity of carbapenemase producers among carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) isolates warrants an expansion of detection capabilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the commercially available Xpert Carba-R (Carba-R) and the research-use-only Xpert Carba-R NxG (Carba-R NxG) in a global collection of P. aeruginosa. The challenge set included 123 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 12 countries. Isolates were previously categorized via PCR or whole-genome sequencing. Carbapenemase classes tested include VIM, IMP, NDM, SPM, KPC, and GES. Non-carbapenemase (non-CP)-harboring isolates were also tested (negative control). Isolates were tested using the Carba-R NxG and the Carba-R tests per the manufacturer’s instructions. Carba-R NxG testing was completed by Cepheid (Sunnyvale, CA), blinded to genotype. Both assays gave negative results for all non-CP isolates and positive results for all VIM, NDM, and KPC isolates. An improvement in IMP detection among isolates was observed (100% detection by Carba-R NxG versus 58% by Carba-R). All SPM and GES isolates, targets not present in commercially available Carba-R, were positive by Carba-R NxG. Two isolates harbored both VIM and GES, while a third isolate contained VIM and NDM. The Carba-R NxG identified both targets in all 3 isolates, while the Carba-R was negative for both GES-containing isolates. Overall, the Carba-R NxG successfully categorized 100% of isolates tested compared with 68% for its predecessor. The Carba-R NxG will expand the detection spectrum of the current Carba-R assay to include SPM, GES, and expanded IMP variants, increasing the global utility of the test

    Presence of \u3cem\u3eClostridioides difficile \u3c/em\u3eand multidrug-resistant healthcare-associated pathogens in stool specimens from hospitalized patients in the USA

    No full text
    Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Many HCAI pathogens, including multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), colonize the gastrointestinal tract. Aim: To determine the frequency of MDRO carriage in patients who do and do not harbour toxigenic Clostridioides difficile in their stools. Methods: Stool specimens received from nine US laboratories were cultured using media selective for C. difficile, Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms (CROs). Specimens and isolates were also tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Bacterial isolates underwent susceptibility testing and genotyping. Findings: Among 363 specimens, 175 yielded toxigenic C. difficile isolates spanning 27 PCR ribotypes. C. difficile (TCD+) stools harboured an additional 28 organisms, including six CROs (3.4%), of which two (1.1%) were carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs), 19 VRE (10.9%), and three meticillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (MRSA, 1.7 %). Stools that were culture negative for toxigenic C. difficile (TCD-) yielded 26 organisms, including four CROs (2.1%), 20 VRE (10.6), and two MRSA (1.1%). Excluding C. difficile, no significant differences were seen in the rates of the MDROs between TCD+ and TCD- specimens. Conclusion: Overall, 15.4% of the TCD+ stools and 11.2% of the TCD- stools carried at least one non-C. difficile MDRO pathogen, indicating that multiple MDROs may be present in the gastrointestinal tracts of patients, including those that harbour C. difficile

    Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates from Nigeria by Whole Genome Sequencing

    No full text
    This study characterized the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients in Yola, Nigeria. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 66 isolates previously identified phenotypically as carbapenem-non–susceptible. The patterns of beta-lactamase resistance genes identified were primarily species-specific. However, blaNDM-7 and blaCMY-4 were detected in all Escherichia coli and most Providencia rettgeri isolates; blaNDM-7 was also detected in 1 Enterobacter cloacae. The E. coli and E. cloacae isolates also shared blaOXA-1, while blaOXA-10 was found in all P. rettgeri, one Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 1 E. coli. Except for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates, which only contained blaL1, most species carried multiple beta-lactamase genes, including those encoding extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, AmpC and OXA in addition to a carbapenemase gene. Carbapenemase genes were either class B or class D beta-lactamases. No carbapenemase gene was detected by WGS in 13.6% of isolates
    corecore