Bullying and Victimization Trajectories in the First Years of Secondary Education:Implications for Status and Affection

Bullying is known to be associated with social status, but it remains unclear how bullying involvement over time relates to social position (status and affection), especially in the first years at a new school. The aim of this study was to investigate whether (the development of) bullying and victimization was related to the attainment of status (perceived popularity) and affection (friendships, acceptance, rejection) in the first years of secondary education (six waves). Using longitudinal data spanning the first- and second year of secondary education of 824 adolescents (51.5% girls; M(age) T1 = 12.54, SD = 0.45) in the SNARE-study, joint bullying and victimization trajectories were estimated using parallel Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA). The four trajectories (decreasing bully, stable high bully, decreasing victim, uninvolved) were related to adolescents’ social position using multigroup analysis that examined differences in slope and intercepts (T1 and T6) of social positions, and indicated that the relative social position of the different joint trajectories was determined at the start of secondary education and did not change over time, with one exception: adolescents continuing bullying were besides being popular also increasingly rejected over time. Although bullying is functional behavior that serves to optimize adolescents’ social position, anti-bullying interventions may account for the increasing lack of affection that may hinder bullies’ long-term social development

Does playing chess make children smart?

Schaken is een van oudsher klassiek bordspel waarbij veel cognitieve vaardigheden nodig zijn, zoals concentratie, planning en inhibitie. Daarom zijn het vaak de slimme kinderen die kiezen voor schaakles of zelfs eerder toegang krijgen tot het volgen van schaakles, binnen en buiten school. Maar zijn het de slimme kinderen die schaaklessen gaan volgen of worden kinderen ook slimmer van schaken? Om slimmer te worden van schaakles zou ‘far transfer’ van leren moeten optreden. Dit is overdracht van vaardigheden tussen minder sterk gerelateerde domeinen, zoals lijkt te gebeuren bij schaken en rekenvaardigheid, omdat beide domeinen kenmerken delen (numerieke en ruimtelijke vaardigheden). Daarnaast zijn er prille aanwijzingen dat schaken een positieve invloed heeft op het executief functioneren van kinderen, zoals cognitieve flexibiliteit, planning en inhibitie. Omdat betere executieve functies zijn gerelateerd aan betere schoolvaardigheden hypothetiseren wij een mediërende rol voor executieve functies in de relatie tussen schaakles en schoolvaardigheden. Schaken kan in dit geval gezien worden als een vorm van executieve functietraining, waarbij de principes van dergelijke trainingen gevolgd kunnen worden om cognitieve functies bij kinderen te verbeteren (zoals het uitdagend maken van de training). Deze training kan onder andere ingezet worden bij achterblijvende schoolprestaties en cognitieve ontwikkeling. Schaken is dus niet alleen voor slimme kinderen. Voor ieder niveau zijn er varianten op het klassieke schaakspel, waardoor iedereen, ook jonge kinderen, op een speelse en ontdekkende manier met schaken in aanraking kunnen komen

Bullying and Victimization Trajectories in the First Years of Secondary Education: Implications for Status and Affection

Bullying is known to be associated with social status, but it remains unclear how bullying involvement over time relates to social position (status and affection), especially in the first years at a new school. The aim of this study was to investigate whether (the development of) bullying and victimization was related to the attainment of status (perceived popularity) and affection (friendships, acceptance, rejection) in the first years of secondary education (six waves). Using longitudinal data spanning the first- and second year of secondary education of 824 adolescents (51.5% girls; Mage T1 = 12.54, SD = 0.45) in the SNARE-study, joint bullying and victimization trajectories were estimated using parallel Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA). The four trajectories (decreasing bully, stable high bully, decreasing victim, uninvolved) were related to adolescents' social position using multigroup analysis that examined differences in slope and intercepts (T1 and T6) of social positions, and indicated that the relative social position of the different joint trajectories was determined at the start of secondary education and did not change over time, with one exception: adolescents continuing bullying were besides being popular also increasingly rejected over time. Although bullying is functional behavior that serves to optimize adolescents' social position, anti-bullying interventions may account for the increasing lack of affection that may hinder bullies' long-term social development

Bullying and Victimization Trajectories in the First Years of Secondary Education: Implications for Status and Affection

Bullying is known to be associated with social status, but it remains unclear how bullying involvement over time relates to social position (status and affection), especially in the first years at a new school. The aim of this study was to investigate whether (the development of) bullying and victimization was related to the attainment of status (perceived popularity) and affection (friendships, acceptance, rejection) in the first years of secondary education (six waves). Using longitudinal data spanning the first- and second year of secondary education of 824 adolescents (51.5% girls; Mage T1 = 12.54, SD = 0.45) in the SNARE-study, joint bullying and victimization trajectories were estimated using parallel Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA). The four trajectories (decreasing bully, stable high bully, decreasing victim, uninvolved) were related to adolescents' social position using multigroup analysis that examined differences in slope and intercepts (T1 and T6) of social positions, and indicated that the relative social position of the different joint trajectories was determined at the start of secondary education and did not change over time, with one exception: adolescents continuing bullying were besides being popular also increasingly rejected over time. Although bullying is functional behavior that serves to optimize adolescents' social position, anti-bullying interventions may account for the increasing lack of affection that may hinder bullies' long-term social development