23 research outputs found

    Recommendations for the advancement of oil-in-water media and source oil characterization in aquatic toxicity test studies

    Get PDF
    During toxicity testing, chemical analyses of oil and exposure media samples are needed to allow comparison of results between different tests as well as to assist with identification of the drivers and mechanisms for the toxic effects observed. However, to maximize the ability to compare results between different laboratories and biota, it has long been recognized that guidelines for standard protocols were needed. In 2005, the Chemical Response to Oil Spills: Ecological Effects Research Forum (CROSERF) protocol was developed with existing common analytical methods that described a standard method for reproducible preparation of exposure media as well as recommended specific analytical methods and analyte lists for comparative toxicity testing. At the time, the primary purpose for the data collected was to inform oil spill response and contingency planning. Since then, with improvements in both analytical equipment and methods, the use of toxicity data has expanded to include their integration into fate and effect models that aim to extend the applicability of lab-based study results to make predictions for field system-level impacts. This paper focuses on providing a summary of current chemical analyses for characterization of oil and exposure media used during aquatic toxicity testing and makes recommendations for the minimum analyses needed to allow for interpretation and modeling purposes.publishedVersio

    Overview of the MOSAiC expedition - Atmosphere

    Get PDF
    With the Arctic rapidly changing, the needs to observe, understand, and model the changes are essential. To support these needs, an annual cycle of observations of atmospheric properties, processes, and interactions were made while drifting with the sea ice across the central Arctic during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition from October 2019 to September 2020. An international team designed and implemented the comprehensive program to document and characterize all aspects of the Arctic atmospheric system in unprecedented detail, using a variety of approaches, and across multiple scales. These measurements were coordinated with other observational teams to explore cross-cutting and coupled interactions with the Arctic Ocean, sea ice, and ecosystem through a variety of physical and biogeochemical processes. This overview outlines the breadth and complexity of the atmospheric research program, which was organized into 4 subgroups: atmospheric state, clouds and precipitation, gases and aerosols, and energy budgets. Atmospheric variability over the annual cycle revealed important influences from a persistent large-scale winter circulation pattern, leading to some storms with pressure and winds that were outside the interquartile range of past conditions suggested by long-term reanalysis. Similarly, the MOSAiC location was warmer and wetter in summer than the reanalysis climatology, in part due to its close proximity to the sea ice edge. The comprehensiveness of the observational program for characterizing and analyzing atmospheric phenomena is demonstrated via a winter case study examining air mass transitions and a summer case study examining vertical atmospheric evolution. Overall, the MOSAiC atmospheric program successfully met its objectives and was the most comprehensive atmospheric measurement program to date conducted over the Arctic sea ice. The obtained data will support a broad range of coupled-system scientific research and provide an important foundation for advancing multiscale modeling capabilities in the Arctic

    Expériences de recherche en République démocratique du Congo

    Full text link
    VĂ©ritable paradigme d’une Afrique confrontĂ©e Ă  la crise et aux affres de la guerre, le Congo cumule apparemment tous les obstacles Ă  la conduite de recherches de terrain. Alors que la complexitĂ© mĂ©thodologique des enquĂȘtes est partout soulignĂ©e, peut-on prĂ©tendre travailler efficacement dans ce pays ? Ce volume rĂ©pond sans Ă©quivoque par l’affirmative et entend le dĂ©montrer par vingt exemples concrets sĂ©lectionnĂ©s dans une optique pluridisciplinaire – ce qu’aucun ouvrage n’avait rĂ©alisĂ© Ă  ce jour. Notre ambition n’est pas de souligner le caractĂšre exceptionnel des expĂ©riences de recherche en RDC, mais bien au contraire de les rendre Ă  leur juste mesure et de les enchĂąsser dans le grand champ des enquĂȘtes en sciences humaines tout en soulignant la spĂ©cificitĂ© du contexte congolais : faiblesse des structures de recherche locales, focalisation des projets sur le domaine urbain, contractualisation poussĂ©e de la recherche, problĂšmes sĂ©curitaires, etc. Nous espĂ©rons par ce volume susciter des Ă©changes d’idĂ©es autour de la vigilance mĂ©thodologique, entre champs disciplinaires diffĂ©rents, entre spĂ©cialistes d’approches quantitatives et d’approches qualitatives, entre gĂ©nĂ©rations diffĂ©rentes, entre chercheurs du Nord et du Sud
    corecore