Outcomes after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in occluded vascular access used for dialysis purposes

PURPOSE: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using the AngioJet™ system can be considered to reestablish patency in occluded vascular access. The aim of this study was to review our results for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using the AngioJet™ system in patients with arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG). METHODS: Data collected in a database of patients requiring hemodialysis for renal failure were analyzed. Patients who underwent endovascular mechanical thrombectomy procedures with the AngioJet™ system for occlusion of vascular access were included. Clinical and technical success rates and patency rates were calculated. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors of influence. RESULTS: A total of 92 AngioJet™ procedures in 60 patients with thrombosed vascular access were reviewed during a mean follow-up period of 21.5 months in patients with an AVF and 11.9 months in patients with an AVG. Technical and clinical success was achieved in 92.6% of AVF cases and 92.0 and 90.8% of AVG cases with an AVG, respectively. Significantly higher primary and primary-assisted patency rates were observed in the AVF group. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that left-sided vascular access and female sex were independent predictors for failure regarding primary patency in AVG patients. Immunosuppressive drugs and older age were negative predictors for secondary patency in AVG patients. CONCLUSIONS: The AngioJet™ system can be deemed an effective technique to reestablish patency in occluded vascular access with minimal use of central venous catheters for dialysis. Good technical and clinical success rates were achieved with acceptable patency rates, especially in AVF patients

Vascular access creation in octogenarians:The effect of age on outcomes

Background: The prevalence of end-stage renal disease is accelerating among older age groups. Patient-specific factors in the elderly patient group might advocate for a different vascular access creation approach, in which patency, risk of nonmaturation, and time to cannulation with accompanied prolonged catheter use should be of primary importance. The aim of this study was to determine which vascular access has the best outcomes and to determine whether age is associated with different outcomes after vascular access surgery. Methods: Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database of patients treated between November 2004 and December 2017. Two different patient groups were identified: the octogenarian group, consisting of patients aged >= 80 years; and the control group, consisting of all the other patients. A total of 694 vascular access procedures were included in this study, 65 in the octogenarian group and 629 in the control group. Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were calculated and compared between groups and vascular accesses. Multivariable analysis was used to determine whether age is an effect modifier in the association between type of vascular access and different patency outcomes. Results: Mean follow-up was 23.2 months in the octogenarian group and 21.2 months in the control group (P = .210). No significant differences were found in patient survival, with a 5-year survival rate of 63.8% (+/- 5.9%) in the octogenarian group and 57.2% (+/- 2.2%) in the control group (P = .866). Within the octogenarian group, primary failure rate was highest in the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patients, 42.1% (P = .006). Brachiocephalic AVF had significantly improved assisted patency compared with the other vascular accesses among the octogenarians (P = .016). Age was not an effect modifier in the association between type of vascular access and different patency outcomes. The adjusted analysis, corrected for octogenarian age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and sex, showed that brachiocephalic AVF was significantly associated with an increase in primary patency (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.90; P = .006) and primary assisted patency (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.86; P = .006) compared with other vascular accesses. Conclusions: The results of our study support primary placement of a brachiocephalic AVF in the octogenarian patient. A low primary failure rate was achieved with significant improved patency rates compared with the other vascular accesses