5 research outputs found

    Dynamics of water storage in mature subalpine Picea abies: temporal and spatial patterns of change in stem radius

    No full text
    Internal water reserves in bark and foliage of trees contribute to transpiration (T) and play an essential role in optimizing water transport by buffering extreme peaks of water consumption. We examined patterns of stem shrinkage and their relationship to tree water dynamics. We measured fluctuations in root radius and stem radius at different stem heights, T of twigs at the top of the crown and sap flow velocities in stem sections of mature subalpine Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) trees over 2 years. The output of each sensor was coupled by physical functions to a mechanistic flow and storage model of tree water relations. The data verified the model-predicted lag in water storage depletion in response to the onset of transpiration and the lag increased with increasing distance from the crown periphery. Between the crown and stem base, the delay ranged from a few minutes to several hours, depending on microclimatic conditions and tree water status. Stem volume changes were proportional to the amount of water exchanged between the elastic tissues of the bark and the rigid xylem, indicating that the ``peristaltic'' wave of stem contraction along the flow path represented depletion of water stored in bark. On a daily basis, stems lost between 0.2 and 0.5% of their volume as a result of bark dehydration, corresponding to about 2 to 51 of water. This water contributed directly to T. According to the model based on hydraulic principles, there are three main components underlying the dynamics of water storage depletion: flow resistance, storage capacities of needles and bark, and T of each tree section. The resistances and capacities were proportional to the response delay, whereas Tin the lower parts of the tree was inversely proportional. The pattern of T within the crown depended on water intercepted by the branches. Because of these weather-dependent factors, there was no time constant for the response delay along the flow path. Nevertheless, the upper crown and the root section tended to have longer response delays per meter of flow path than the stem. The diurnal course of stem radius fluctuations represents the sum of all external and internal conditions affecting tree water relations; stem radius fluctuations, therefore, provide a sensitive measure of tree water status

    Modeling tree water deficit from microclimate: an approach to quantifying drought stress

    No full text
    Tree water deficit estimated by measuring water-related changes in stem radius (DeltaW) was compared with tree water deficit estimated from the output of a simple, physiologically reasonable model (DeltaW(E)), with soil water potential (Psi(soil)) and atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) as inputs. Values of DeltaW were determined by monitoring stem radius changes with dendrometers and detrending the results for growth, We followed changes in DeltaW and DeltaW(E) in Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus pubescens Willd. over 2 years at a dry site (2001-2002; Salgesch, Wallis) and in Picea abies (L.) Karst. for 1 year at a wet site (1998; Davos, Graubuenden) in the Swiss Alps. The seasonal courses of DeltaW in deciduous species and in conifers at the same site were similar and could be largely explained by variation in DeltaW(E). This finding strongly suggests that DeltaW, despite the known species-specific differences in stomatal response to microclimate, is mainly explained by a combination of atmospheric and soil conditions. Consequently, we concluded that trees are unable to maintain any particular DeltaW. Either Psi(soil) or VPD alone provided poorer estimates of AWthan a model incorporating both factors. As a first approximation of DeltaW(E), Psi(soil) can be weighted so that the negative mean Psi(soil) reaches 65 to 75% of the positive mean daytime VPD over a season (Q. pubescens: similar to65%, P abies: similar to70%, P sylvestris: similar to75%). The differences in DeltaW among species can be partially explained by a different weighting of Psi(soil) against VPD. The DeltaW of P. sylvestris was more dependent on Psi(soil) than that of Q. pubescens, but less than that of P. abies, and was less dependent on VPD than that of P. abies and Q. pubescens. The model worked well for P. abies at the wet site and for Q. pubescens and P. sylvestris at the dry site, and may be useful for estimating water deficit in other tree species

    Intra-annual radial growth and water relations of trees - implications towards a growth mechanism

    Get PDF
    There is a missing link between tree physiological and wood-anatomical knowledge which makes it impossible mechanistically to explain and predict the radial growth of individual trees from climate data. Empirical data of microclimatic factors, intra-annual growth rates, and tree-specific ratios between actual and potential transpiration (T PET−1) of trees of three species (Quercus pubescens, Pinus sylvestris, and Picea abies) at two dry sites in the central Wallis, Switzerland, were recorded from 2002 to 2004 at a 10 min resolution. This included the exceptionally hot and dry summer of 2003. These data were analysed in terms of direct (current conditions) and indirect impacts (predispositions of the past year) on growth. Rain was found to be the only factor which, to a large extent, consistently explained the radial increment for all three tree species at both sites and in the short term as well. Other factors had some explanatory power on the seasonal time-scale only. Quercus pubescens built up much of its tree ring before bud break. Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies started radial growth 1–2 weeks after Quercus pubescens and this was despite the fact that they had a high T PET−1 before budburst and radial growth started. A high T PET−1 was assumed to be related to open stomata, a very high net CO2 assimilation rate, and thus a potential carbon (C)-income for the tree. The main period of radial growth covered about 30–70% of the productive days of a year. In terms of C-allocation, these results mean that Quercus pubescens depended entirely on internal C-stores in the early phase of radial growth and that for all three species there was a long time period of C-assimilation which was not used for radial growth in above-ground wood. The results further suggest a strong dependence of radial growth on the current tree water relations and only secondarily on the C-balance. A concept is discussed which links radial growth over a feedback loop to actual tree water-relations and long-term affected C-storage to microclimate

    Timing of extreme drought modifies reproductive output in semi-natural grassland

    No full text
    Questions Do extreme dry spells in late summer or in spring affect abundance and species composition of the reproductive shoots and the seed rain in the next annual crop? Are drought effects on reproductive shoots related to the rooting depths of species? Location Species-rich semi-natural grassland at Negrentino, Switzerland. Methods In plots under automated rain-out shelters, rainwater was added to simulate normal conditions and compare them with two experimentally effected long dry spells, in late summer (2004) and in the following spring (2005). For 28 plots, numbers of reproductive shoots per species were counted in 1-m2 areas and seed rain was estimated using nine sticky traps of 102 cm2 after dry spells. Results The two extreme dry spells in late summer and spring were similar in length and their probability of recurrence. They independently reduced the subsequent reproductive output of the community, while their seasonal timing modified its species composition. Compared to drought in spring, drought in late summer reduced soil moisture more and reduced the number of reproductive shoots of more species. The negative effects of summer drought decreased with species’ rooting depth. The shallow-rooted graminoids showed a consistent susceptibility to summer drought, while legumes and other forbs showed more varied responses to both droughts. Spring drought strongly reduced density (–53%) and species richness (–43%) of the community seed rain, while summer drought had only a marginally significant impact on seed density of graminoids (–44%). Reductions in seed number per shoot vs reproductive shoot density distinguished the impacts of drought with respect to its seasonal timing. Conclusion The essentially negative impact of drought in different seasons on reproductive output suggests that more frequent dry spells could contribute to local plant diversity loss by aggravating seed deficiency in species-rich grassland
    corecore