39 research outputs found

    The Impact of Local Genome Sequence on Defining Heterochromatin Domains

    Get PDF
    Characterizing how genomic sequence interacts with trans-acting regulatory factors to implement a program of gene expression in eukaryotic organisms is critical to understanding genome function. One means by which patterns of gene expression are achieved is through the differential packaging of DNA into distinct types of chromatin. While chromatin state exerts a major influence on gene expression, the extent to which cis-acting DNA sequences contribute to the specification of chromatin state remains incompletely understood. To address this, we have used a fission yeast sequence element (L5), known to be sufficient to nucleate heterochromatin, to establish de novo heterochromatin domains in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome. The resulting heterochromatin domains were queried for the presence of H3K9 di-methylation and Swi6p, both hallmarks of heterochromatin, and for levels of gene expression. We describe a major effect of genomic sequences in determining the size and extent of such de novo heterochromatin domains. Heterochromatin spreading is antagonized by the presence of genes, in a manner that can occur independent of strength of transcription. Increasing the dosage of Swi6p results in increased heterochromatin proximal to the L5 element, but does not result in an expansion of the heterochromatin domain, suggesting that in this context genomic effects are dominant over trans effects. Finally, we show that the ratio of Swi6p to H3K9 di-methylation is sequence-dependent and correlates with the extent of gene repression. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the sequence content of a genomic region plays a significant role in shaping its response to encroaching heterochromatin and suggest a role of DNA sequence in specifying chromatin state

    Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid

    No full text
    In this study, our objective was to determine the steady-state intrapulmonary concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of orally administered linezolid in healthy volunteers. Linezolid (600 mg every 12 h for a total of five doses) was administered orally to 25 healthy adult male subjects. Each subgroup contained five subjects, who underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) 4, 8, 12, 24, or 48 h after administration of the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to administration of the first dose and fifth dose and at the completion of bronchoscopy and BAL. Standardized bronchoscopy was performed without systemic sedation. The volume of epithelial lining fluid (ELF) recovered was calculated by the urea dilution method, and the total number of alveolar cells (AC) was counted in a hemocytometer after cytocentrifugation. Linezolid was measured in plasma by a high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique and in BAL specimens and AC by a combined HPLC-mass spectrometry technique. Areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) for linezolid in plasma, ELF, and AC were derived by noncompartmental analysis. Half-lives for linezolid in plasma, ELF, and AC were calculated from the elimination rate constants derived from a monoexponential fit of the means of the observed concentrations at each time point. Concentrations (means ± standard deviations) in plasma, ELF, and AC, respectively, were 7.3 ± 4.9, 64.3 ± 33.1, and 2.2 ± 0.6 μg/ml at the 4-h BAL time point and 7.6 ± 1.7, 24.3 ± 13.3, and 1.4 ± 1.3 μg/ml at the 12-h BAL time point. Linezolid concentrations in plasma, ELF, and AC declined monoexponentially, with half-lives of 6.9, 7.0, and 5.7 h, respectively. For a MIC of 4, the 12-h plasma AUC/MIC and maximum concentration/MIC ratios were 34.6 and 3.9, respectively, and the percentage of time the drug remained above the MIC for the 12-h dosing interval was 100%; the corresponding ratios in ELF were 120 and 16.1, respectively, and the percentage of time the drug remained above the MIC was 100%. The long plasma and intrapulmonary linezolid half-lives and the percentage of time spent above the MIC of 100% of the dosing interval provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for drug administration every 12 h and indicate that linezolid is likely to be an effective agent for the treatment of pulmonary infections

    Steady-State Plasma and Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cethromycin

    No full text
    The objective of this study was to determine the steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of orally administered cethromycin in healthy volunteers. The study design included administering 150 or 300 mg of cethromycin once daily to 25 or 35 healthy adult subjects, respectively, for a total of five doses. Standardized and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed after the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to the first and last dose, at multiple time points following the last dose, and at the time of BAL. Cethromycin was measured in plasma, BAL, and alveolar cell (AC) by using a combined high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric technique. Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and AC pharmacokinetics were derived by noncompartmental methods. C(max)/90% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(90)) ratios, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC(90) ratios, intrapulmonary drug exposure ratios, and percent time above MIC(90) during the dosing interval (%T > MIC(90)) were calculated for recently reported respiratory pathogens. The kinetics were nonlinear, i.e., not proportional to dose. In the 150-mg-dose group, the C(max) (mean ± standard deviations), AUC(0-24), and half-life for plasma were 0.181 ± 0.084 μg/ml, 0.902 ± 0.469 μg · h/ml, and 4.85 ± 1.10 h, respectively; for ELF the values were 0.9 ± 0.2 μg/ml, 11.4 μg · h/ml, and 6.43 h, respectively; for AC the values were 12.7 ± 6.4 μg/ml, 160.8 μg · h/ml, and 10.0 h, respectively. In the 300-mg-dose group, the C(max) (mean ± standard deviations), AUC(0-24), and half-life for plasma were 0.500 ± 0.168 μg/ml, 3.067 ± 1.205 μg · h/ml, and 4.94 ± 0.66 h, respectively; for ELF the values were 2.7 ± 2.0 μg/ml, 24.15 μg · h/ml, and 5.26 h, respectively; for AC the values were 55.4 ± 38.7 μg/ml, 636.2 μg · h/ml, and 11.6 h, respectively. We concluded that the C(max)/MIC(90) ratios, AUC/MIC(90) ratios, %T > MIC(90) values, and extended plasma and intrapulmonary half-lives provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration and are favorable for the treatment of cethromycin-susceptible pulmonary infections
    corecore