Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine

Self-monitoring of blood glucose plays an important role in the management of diabetes and has been shown to improve metabolic control. The use of blood glucose meters in clinical practice requires sufficient reliability to allow adequate treatment. Direct comparison of different blood glucose meters in clinical practice, independent of the manufactures is scarce. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate three frequently used blood glucose meters in daily clinical practice

Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring during differing exercise conditions.

Depending on intensity, exercise may induce a strong hormonal and metabolic response, including acid-base imbalances and changes in microcirculation, potentially interfering with the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the Dexcom G4 Platinum (DG4P) CGM during continuous moderate and intermittent high-intensity exercise (IHE) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Ten male individuals with well-controlled T1DM (HbA1c 7.0 ± 0.6% [54 ± 6 mmol/mol]) inserted the DG4P sensor 2 days prior to a 90 min cycling session (50% VO2peak) either with (IHE) or without (CONT) a 10s all-out sprint every 10 min. Venous blood samples for reference glucose measurement were drawn every 10 min and euglycemia (target 7 mmol/l) was maintained using an oral glucose solution. Additionally, lactate and venous blood gas variables were determined. Mean reference blood glucose was 7.6 ± 0.2 mmol/l during IHE and 6.7 ± 0.2 mmol/l during CONT (p<0.001). IHE resulted in significantly higher levels of lactate (7.3 ± 0.5 mmol/l vs. 2.6 ± 0.3 mmol/l, p<0.001), while pH values were significantly lower in the IHE group (7.27 vs. 7.38, p=0.001). Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 13.3 ± 2.2% for IHE and 13.6 ± 2.8% for CONT suggesting comparable accuracy (p=0.90). Using Clarke Error Grid Analysis, 100% of CGM values during both IHE and CONT were in zones A and B (IHE: 77% and 23%; CONT: 78% and 22%). The present study revealed good and comparable accuracy of the DG4P CGM system during intermittent high intensity and continuous moderate intensity exercise, despite marked differences in metabolic conditions. This corroborates the clinical robustness of CGM under differing exercise conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02068638

A metabolomics approach to uncover effects of different exercise modalities in type 1 diabetes

Introduction: Exercise-associated metabolism in type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains under-studied due to the complex interplay between exogenous insulin, counter-regulatory hormones and insulin-sensitivity. Objective: To identify the metabolic differences induced by two exercise modalities in T1D using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC–HRMS) based metabolomics. Methods: Twelve T1D adults performed intermittent high-intensity (IHE) and continuous-moderate-intensity (CONT) exercise. Serum samples were analysed by UHPLC–HRMS. Results: Metabolic profiling of IHE and CONT highlighted exercise-induced changes in purine and acylcarnitine metabolism. Conclusion: IHE may increase beta-oxidation through higher ATP-turnover. UHPLC–HRMS based metabolomics as a data-driven approach without an a priori hypothesis may help uncover distinctive metabolic effects during exercise in T1D. Clinical trial registration number is www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02068638. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York