Instrument Development Measuring Critical Care Nurses' Attitudes and Behaviors with End-of-life Care

Although critical care nurses are expected to focus on providing life-sustaining measures, many intensive care patients actually receive end-of-life care

Building collaborations: Designing and implementing an interprofessional course in the health professions

Our Model: Designed by Students for Students • Independent study with 6-7 health professions graduate students • Faculty mentors • Students developed objectives, learning activities, and designed modules • Content validity • Students were our best recruiters for the fal

Exploring the Requisite Skills and Competencies of Pharmacists Needed for Success in an Evolving Health Care Environment

Objective. To identify and describe the core competencies and skills considered essential for success of pharmacists in today’s rapidly evolving health care environment

Preparing MSW students for Integrated Behavioral Healthcare through Interprofessional Education: Lessons Learned

Lessons learned from one school’s efforts to incorporate interprofessional courses, workshops, and field placement opportunities for MSW and allied-health graduate students will be addressed. Due to recent Health Resources and Services Administration funding and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, interprofessional education models are paramount as social workers navigate a new health-care context

Interprofessional collaboration between health sciences librarians and health professions faculty to implement a book club discussion for incoming students

Background The following case example provides an overview of one innovative way to engage health professions faculty with health sciences librarians in the development of an interprofessional book discussion and identifies strategies to address implementation challenges. Academic health sciences librarians worked with the Interprofessional Education (IPE) Steering Committee to organize interprofessional book discussion groups for incoming health professions students. This inaugural book discussion brought together students and faculty of different disciplines to engage students in “learning from, with, and about” other professions. Case Presentation When Breath Becomes Air, by Paul Kalanithi, allowed involved discussions on important health sciences issues. The project included outreach, designing pre- and post-surveys, scheduling participants, and communicating with all participants before, during, and after the event. A total of seventy-nine students and thirty-six faculty, representing all health professions schools, participated in the small group IPE book discussions over two weeks. Conclusions Small group book discussions have been shown to be an effective tool to engage students and faculty in IPE. The results of the participant surveys were positive, and the IPE Steering Committee found value in including health sciences librarians throughout the process. Lessons learned from the pilot project include needing an efficient scheduling system, strongly communicating at all stages of the project, and starting the planning process months ahead of time. The IPE Steering Committee plans to conduct similar book discussions every fall semester moving forward and explore options for other IPE events

Triangle Interprofessional Partners for Prevention (TIPP): Students Collaborating to Improve Care for Superutilizer Patients

Background: • In the US, 5% of Medicaid patients account for nearly half of health care costs, but this spending does not improve patient outcomes. • Cost-effectiveness and value are an increasing focus in health care; therefore these so-called superutilizer (SU) patients are garnering increased national attention, through the initiatives of Camden Coalition. • Interdisciplinary care can improve care for patients, but medical education often neglects these interprofessional (IP) experiences. • Triangle Interprofessional Partners for Prevention (TIPP) was established with a way to improve SU patient care, decrease hospitalization costs, and promote IP education among students in health care fields. Objectives: 1. Develop sustainable processes to engage IP students in improving quality of health care. 2. Decrease unnecessary hospitalizations and Emergency Department visits for SU patients, lowering total hospital charges. 3. Increase opportunities for IP students to collaborate, fostering mutual understanding and respect. Methods: • An EMR-generated algorithm identified SU patients at UNC (>3 hospitalizations in 12 months). • IP teams of 2-3 social work, nursing, public health, and medicine students conducted home visits and appointments to identify root causes of hospitalizations. Teams worked closely with patients to address risk factors for readmission and coordinate care. • Students met weekly with IP faculty to discuss patient needs and progress. Examples of services provided to patients include: assistance with food insecurity and unstable housing, arranging a new primary care physician, facilitating application for financial assistance with medical bills. Results: • Recruitment is ongoing, but preliminary results for patients enrolled in 2016 are available. • Of the seven enrolled patients, pre-intervention average monthly inpatient charges ranged from $2,235 to$19,662 monthly. Pre-intervention average monthly outpatient charges ranged from $0 to$6,457. • Post-intervention, average monthly inpatient cost decreased in five of seven patients. For these patients, average monthly inpatient charges ranged from $0 to$50,267 and outpatient charges ranged from $85 to$5,290. Three of seven patients have not had any additional hospitalizations post-intervention. Five of seven patients had a decrease in average hospitalization rate. • Results last updated February 2017 Key Lessons for Dissemination: To support other programs who wish to adapt this model at their home institutions, we summarize these key lessons for implementation: o Identifying and Connecting with Patients • During the course of our program, we trialed models including inpatient, outpatient, and a mixed patient populations, balancing SU needs with logistical necessities. It was easiest for us to successfully make contact with hospitalized patients, thus we favor an inpatient population model. If we were unable to connect with hospitalized patients before discharge, we established initial contact with patients over the phone. • We initially experienced challenges identifying hospitalized patients and assigning available team members in real time. A team member with protected time to identify patients is ideal. o IP Education and Collaboration • The divergent schedules of IP students presented challenges in finding a consistent time to meet as a large team. We propose identifying a weekly IP half day set aside by all schools for IP activities. • Successful implementation of IP initiatives requires institutional buy-in and administrative support. Our enthusiastic and supportive IP faculty champions have been essential to the TIPP’s success. o Students as significant contributors to care • We believe this program is mutually beneficial to student and patient and demonstrates the students’ potential to directly improve patient care. • Students are low cost contributors to care. TIPP’s cost of implementation consists solely of faculty time contributed to meeting with students. o Sustainability • TIPP is currently run by faculty and student volunteers. As we continue to grow, incorporating students from other professional schools, and as UNC transitions to a Next Generation Accountable Care Organization, institutional buy-in will be key to future sustainability. Conclusion: • As high value care becomes an increasing focus, addressing these SU patients is an important strategy to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. • TIPP is a student-driven organization aiming to improve the quality and efficiency of SU patient care and promote IP education. • Students work in IP teams to address SU patients’ risk factors for rehospitalization. • IP educational opportunities are an important way to develop quality interdisciplinary care givers in the future. • Results from patients recruited last year demonstrate that five of seven enrolled patients had a decrease in average monthly inpatient cost and average hospitalization rate after enrollment in the TIPP program. • Patient recruitment is ongoing and as we continue to refine our processes, we hope to include additional IP students from the schools of pharmacy and physician assistants. • Students are an abundant, untapped resource in academic medical centers and a potentially significant contributor to improve the quality and efficiency of patient care

Developing a Mobility Protocol for Early Mobilization of Patients in a Surgical/Trauma ICU

As technology and medications have improved and increased, survival rates are also increasing in intensive care units (ICUs), so it is now important to focus on improving the patient outcomes and recovery. To do this, ICU patients need to be assessed and started on an early mobility program, if stable. While the early mobilization of the ICU patients is not without risk, the current literature has demonstrated that patients can be safely and feasibly mobilized, even while requiring mechanical ventilation. These patients are at a high risk for muscle deconditioning due to limited mobility from numerous monitoring equipment and multiple medical conditions. Frequently, a critically ill patient only receives movement from nurses; such as, being turned side to side, pulled up in bed, or transferred from bed to a stretcher for a test. The implementation of an early mobility protocol that can be used by critical care nurses is important for positive patient outcomes minimizing the functional decline due to an ICU stay. This paper describes a pilot study to evaluate an early mobilization protocol to test the safety and feasibility for mechanically ventilated patients in a surgical trauma ICU in conjunction with the current unit standards

Developing a mobility protocol for early mobilization of patients in a surgical/trauma ICU. Crit Care Res Pract

As technology and medications have improved and increased, survival rates are also increasing in intensive care units (ICUs), so it is now important to focus on improving the patient outcomes and recovery. To do this, ICU patients need to be assessed and started on an early mobility program, if stable. While the early mobilization of the ICU patients is not without risk, the current literature has demonstrated that patients can be safely and feasibly mobilized, even while requiring mechanical ventilation. These patients are at a high risk for muscle deconditioning due to limited mobility from numerous monitoring equipment and multiple medical conditions. Frequently, a critically ill patient only receives movement from nurses; such as, being turned side to side, pulled up in bed, or transferred from bed to a stretcher for a test. The implementation of an early mobility protocol that can be used by critical care nurses is important for positive patient outcomes minimizing the functional decline due to an ICU stay. This paper describes a pilot study to evaluate an early mobilization protocol to test the safety and feasibility for mechanically ventilated patients in a surgical trauma ICU in conjunction with the current unit standards