Detection of DNA-Psoralen Photoadducts in Mammalian Skin

An immunofluorescence (IF) method for the detection of 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) photoadducts to DNA has been developed to assess nuclear damage in keratinocytes and melanocytes after psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) treatment, both under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Cryostat sections of the albino and pigmented guinea pig and human skin were used for in vitro studies to establish minimal and maximal drug concentration and UVA dosimetry for the detection of DNA-8-MOP photoadducts. Limits of detection were as low as 10 ng/cm2 8-MOP and 1 J/cm2 UVA for skin sections and sodium bromide-split epidermal sheets. Guinea pigs treated with topical PUVA revealed positive IF stain in epidermal cell nuclei at a threshold dose of 100 μg/cm2: 8-MOP and 13 J/cm2 UVA. Pretreatments of cryostat cuts with ethanol and alkali before IF test enhanced the sensitivity of detection in vivo about 10-fold and enabled us to follow the repair of DNA damage after treating normal guinea pig skin with a dose of 50 μg/cm2 8-MOP plus 6 J/cm2 UVA. The most interesting findings were as follows: (1) A sensitive method to detect PUVA-induced nuclear damage in epidermal and dermal cells was developed. (2) PUVA treatment induced nuclear DNA damage to melanocytes as well as to adjacent keratinocytes, and melanocytes appeared to be 10 times less vulnerable to photo-damage than keratinocytes. (3) There was a greater propensity for the proliferative cells to be damaged by PUVA. (4) PUVA induced nuclear damage up to 700 μm depth in the dermis. (5) The usefulness of the IF test in detecting DNA damage in μg and ng amounts in vivo and in following the repair of damaged DNA induced by PUVA

Cotranslational assembly of the yeast SET1C histone methyltransferase complex

While probing the role of RNA for the function of SET1C/COMPASS histone methyltransferase, we identified SET1RC (SET1 mRNA-associated complex), a complex that contains SET1 mRNA and Set1, Swd1, Spp1 and Shg1, four of the eight polypeptides that constitute SET1C. Characterization of SET1RC showed that SET1 mRNA binding did not require associated Swd1, Spp1 and Shg1 proteins or RNA recognition motifs present in Set1. RNA binding was not observed when Set1 protein and SET1 mRNA were derived from independent genes or when SET1 transcripts were restricted to the nucleus. Importantly, the protein–RNA interaction was sensitive to EDTA, to the translation elongation inhibitor puromycin and to the inhibition of translation initiation in prt1-1 mutants. Taken together, our results support the idea that SET1 mRNA binding was dependent on translation and that SET1RC assembled on nascent Set1 in a cotranslational manner. Moreover, we show that cellular accumulation of Set1 is limited by the availability of certain SET1C components, such as Swd1 and Swd3, and suggest that cotranslational protein interactions may exert an effect in the protection of nascent Set1 from degradation