Burden of living with HIV among men who have sex with men: a mixed-methods study

Background: With biomedical developments in treatment and prevention of HIV, the implications of living with HIV are considerably more manageable. Within this context, we aimed to describe and quantify the present-day burden of living with HIV among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Netherlands. Methods: In this mixed-methods study, we did in-depth interviews on HIV-related burden with MSM diagnosed with HIV between 2014 and 2018. Interviewees were recruited at three HIV treatment centres and the Public Health Service of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Using the transcripts from all interviewees, the qualitative analysis was done by two independent researchers applying an open-coding process. Results were used to generate a questionnaire measuring HIV-related burden, which was distributed via gay dating apps or sites and social media. MSM diagnosed with HIV before 2019 who completed the questionnaire were included in the quantitative analyses. Descriptive analyses were used to report burden prevalence and to explore differences in burden among MSM diagnosed at different antiretroviral therapy periods. Sociodemographic determinants of burden were explored using multinomial logistic regression. Findings: Between May, 2018, and March, 2019, 18 of 25 MSM who consented for further contact were interviewed, after which thematic saturation was reached. The interviewees revealed that aspects related to medicalisation and emotional consequences were burdensome temporarily after diagnosis, whereas aspects related to HIV status disclosure, stigma, and the sexual and social life were mentioned to be burdensome more persistently. Between April and July, 2019, 613 MSM with HIV started the quantitative survey, of whom 438 (71%) completed the questionnaire and were included in the analyses. These 438 MSM were diagnosed with HIV between 1984 and 2018. The median time since HIV diagnosis was 8 years (IQR 4–13). In total, 135 (31%) of 438 online respondents reported that living with HIV was generally experienced as burdensome and 361 (82%) would be relieved if HIV could be cured. Compared with a low level of burden, a moderate level of burden was associated with having another chronic condition (p=0·0030), and a high level of burden was associated with a more recent diagnosis (p=0·0060) and not knowing other individuals with HIV (p=0·0020). Disclosure dilemmas were reported to be the most burdensome, resulting in difficulties initiating sex (122 [32%] of 378 respondents) and establishing relationships (85 [41%] of 207 respondents). The most prevalent emotional consequences were shame (112 [26%] of 438 respondents) and stress (80 [18%] of 438 respondents). Disclosure and taking antiretroviral therapy in the presence of others were experienced as more burdensome among those diagnosed after 2005 than among those diagnosed in or before 2005. Interpretation: Our findings highlight that despite medical advancements, further stigma reduction programmes and adapted psychosocial support for specific profiles of MSM living with HIV are needed. Funding: HIV Transmission Elimination Amsterdam Initiative

Barriers and Motives for Complying With “Sexual Distancing” Among Men Who Have Sex With Men During the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Amsterdam: A Qualitative Study

Background  Between March 15 and May 31, 2020, the Dutch government imposed lockdown and health measures to curb the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As part of social distancing, sexual distancing was one of these measures. Sexual distancing implied refraining from sex with partners outside of one's household. We aimed to elucidate barriers and motives for complying with sexual distancing and related factors that could have led to (non)compliance among men who have sex with men.  Methods  In this exploratory qualitative study, we interviewed men who have sex with men who visited the center for sexual health in Amsterdam during the first COVID-19 lockdown using a semistructured interview guide from March to May 2020. We interviewed both men who complied and did not comply with sexual distancing. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an open-coding process in MAXQDA.  Results  We included 18 noncompliers and 4 compliers to COVID-19 sexual distancing. Barriers to compliance were the following: lack of information on, or understanding of, the need for sexual distancing; being single; having had an active sex life before COVID-19; a high perceived importance of the social aspect of sex; a strong urge for sex; using sex to cope with the negative impact of the pandemic; being under the influence of alcohol or drugs; and not perceiving COVID-19 as a serious health threat. Motives for compliance were the following: perceiving COVID-19 as a serious health threat, direct confrontation with critically ill COVID-19 patients, protecting someone dear from COVID-19, and being convinced of the importance of social and/or sexual distancing measures.  Conclusions  Information on sexual distancing needs to be made more explicit, accessible, understandable, inclusive, customized to individual barriers, and relatable to the key populations. This may improve the effectiveness of measures and health recommendations in both the current COVID-19 pandemic and future respiratory outbreaks

Sexual Distancing During 5 Periods Around and During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Background Social and sexual distancing (ie, abstaining from sex with persons outside one's household) was important in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compliance to distancing measures can change over time. We assessed changes in compliance to the sexual distancing measures during five periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.Methods Between November 2021 and March 2022, we used a structured questionnaire containing questions about sexual behavior and factors that could have influenced compliance with sexual distancing. Variables related to sexual behavior were measured for 5 periods, before and during the pandemic, delineated by imposement and relaxation of lockdown measures.Results Eight hundred seventy participants (predominantly MSM) completed the questionnaire. We found that compliance to the sexual distancing measures decreased over time. The number of casual partners was highest after the lockdown measures were relaxed for the second time (April 2021 to March 2022), and even higher than before the first lockdown. Factors positively associated with sexual distancing compliance were: having confidence in the information provided by the government and experiencing less or similar need for physical contact compared with before the pandemic. Factors that lowered compliance over time were: previously having had COVID-19, perceiving the lockdown measures as overstated, having sex with casual partners and similar drug use during the pandemic as before.Conclusions Our findings suggest that sexual distancing measures are difficult to maintain for a long period. Other measures, such as confinement to a small network of known partners, might be more effective for longer pandemics in minimizing the spread of infectious diseases