Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures

__Abstract__ This thesis consists of three parts. Part 1 described aspects of the organization of trauma related trials. Part 2 analyzed the uniformity of current femoral neck fracture treatment and adherence to the Dutch guideline on hip fracture treatment. The implications of treatment with internal fixation on health care costs were also described. Part 3 focused on aspects on functional outcome after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. In summary, this thesis provides evidence that: • A central, financed trial coordinator to manage all trial related tasks in participating sites is a recommended strategy to improve trial progression (Chapter 2) • Adequate knowledge on the International Conference of Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guideline is important when conducting an implant trial in orthopedic trauma surgery (Chapter 3) • The current treatment of femoral neck fracture patients is in agreement with the Dutch national guideline in at least 74% of patients (Chapter 4) • The current treatment of non-simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures is uniform in 73-88% of patients (Chapter 5) • In and out of hospital cost of internal fixation of femoral neck fracture patients is approximately €16,000 at one year follow-up and €19,000 at two years follow-up (Chapter 6) • Internal fixation of femoral neck fracture patients leads to femoral neck shortening and secondary permanent physical limitations in a majority of patients (Chapter 7) • Salvage arthroplasty patients have inferior functional outcome than patients who heal after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture (Chapter 8) • Implant removal positively influences function-related quality of life in patients after internal fixation with persisting pain or unsatisfactory functional recovery (Chapter 9) • The physical therapy that femoral neck fracture patients receive after internal fixation generally consists of active movement, functional exercise, and independent practice for less than two times a week, during 20 weeks (Chapter 10

Implant removal after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture: Effects on physical functioning

Objectives: The effect of implant removal after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture on physical functioning was analyzed. Characteristics of patients who had their implant removed were studied, as it is currently unknown from which type of patients implants are removed and what effect removal has on function. Design: Secondary cohort study alongside a randomized controlled trial. Setting: Multicenter study in 14 hospitals. Patients and Intervention: Patients who had their implant removed after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture are compared with patients who did not. Main outcome measurements: Patient characteristics and quality of life (Short Form 12, Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index) were compared. Matched pairs were selected based on patient/fracture characteristics and prefracture physical functioning. Results: Of 162 patients, 37 (23%) had their implant removed. These patients were younger (median age: 67 vs. 72 years, P 0.024) and more often independently ambulatory prefracture (100% vs. 84%, P 0.008) than patients who did not. They more often had evident implant back-out on x-rays (54% vs. 34%, P 0.035), possibly related to a higher rate of Pauwels 3 fractures (41% vs. 22%, P 0.032). In time, quality of life improved more in implant removal patients [+2 vs. -4 points, Short Form 12 (physical component), P 0.024; +9 vs. 0 points, Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, P 0.019]. Conclusions: Implant removal after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture positively influenced quality of life. Implant removal patients were younger and more often independently ambulatory prefracture, more often had a Pauwels 3 fracture, and an evident implant back-out. Implant removal should be considered liberally for these patients if pain persists or functional recovery is unsatisfactory. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Functional Outcome After Successful Internal Fixation Versus Salvage Arthroplasty of Patients With a Femoral Neck Fracture

Objectives: To determine patient independency, health-related and disease-specific quality of life (QOL), gait pattern, and muscle strength in patients after salvage arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. Design: Secondary cohort study to a randomized controlled trial. Setting: Multicenter trial in the Netherlands, including 14 academic and nonacademic hospitals. Patients: Patients after salvage arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture were studied. A comparison was made with patients who healed uneventfully after internal fixation. Intervention: None (observatory study). Main Outcome Measurements: Patient characteristics, SF-12, and Western Ontario McMaster osteoarthritis index scores were collected. Gait parameters were measured using plantar pressure measurement. Maximum isometric forces of the hip muscles were measured using a handheld dynamome

Cumulative incidence and treatment of non-simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures in a cohort of one thousand two hundred and fifty patients

Purpose In the Netherlands, over 20,000 patients sustain a hip fracture yearly. A first hip fracture is a risk factor for a second,

Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures

Background: Femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of revision surgery after management with internal fixation. Using data from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial evaluating methods of internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures, we investigated associations between baseline and surgical factors and the need for revision surgery to promote healing, relieve pain, treat infection or improve function over 24 months postsurgery. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with (1) hardware removal and (2) implant exchange from cancellous screws (CS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) to total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or another internal fixation device. Methods: We identified 15 potential factors a priori that may be associated with revision surgery, 7 with hardware removal, and 14 with implant exchange. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses in our investigation. Results: Factors associated with increased risk of revision surgery included: female sex, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.50; P = 0.001], higher body mass index (fo

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture

Background: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) has been extensively evaluated in groups of patients with osteoarthritis, yet not in patients with a femoral neck fracture. This study aimed to determine the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the WOMAC compared with the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires for the assessment of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. Methods: Reliability was tested by assessing the Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was determined with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Change scores were calculated from ten weeks to twelve months of follow-up. Standardized response means and floor and ceiling effects were determined. Analyses were performed to compare the results for patients less than eighty years old with those for patients eighty years of age or older. Results: The mean WOMAC total score was 89 points before the fracture in the younger patients and increased from 70 points at ten weeks to 81 points at two years postoperatively. In the older age group, these scores were 86, 75, and 78 point

Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Background Reoperation rates are high after surgery for hip fractures. We investigated the effect of a sliding hip screw versus cancellous screws on the risk of reoperation and other key outcomes. Methods For this international, multicentre, allocation concealed randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 50 years or older with a low-energy hip fracture requiring fracture fixation from 81 clinical centres in eight countries. Patients were assigned by minimisation with a centralised computer system to receive a single large-diameter screw with a side-plate (sliding hip screw) or the present standard of care, multiple small-diameter cancellous screws. Surgeons and patients were not blinded but the data analyst, while doing the analyses, remained blinded to treatment groups. The primary outcome was hip reoperation within 24 months after initial surgery to promote fracture healing, relieve pain, treat infection, or improve function. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00761813. Findings Between Mar