2 research outputs found
Comparison of different uptake patterns in <sup>18</sup>F-AIF-NOTA-PRGD2 PET and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET.
<p>The enlarged lymph node identified on CT (A1 and B1) had significantly higher uptake of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET (B2–B3) than that for <sup>18</sup>F-AIF-NOTA-PRGD2 (A2–A3).</p
Comparison of SUVs from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and <sup>18</sup>F-AIF-NOTA-PRGD2 PET for all malignant lesions.
<p>Comparison of SUVs from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and <sup>18</sup>F-AIF-NOTA-PRGD2 PET for all malignant lesions.</p