3 research outputs found
Robot-assisted pyeloplasty with buccal mucosa graft for the management of an extended recurrent ureteropelvic junction stricture
A clinical case of robot-assisted pyeloplasty with buccal mucosa graft of an extended recurrent stricture of the left ureteropelvic junction is presented. The patient had previously undergone left-sided laparoscopic antevasal pyeloplasty and retrograde endopyelotomies with ureteral stenting. However, after these interventions, the dilatation of the left pelvicalyceal system persisted, the patient complained of lumbar pain and periodic exacerbations of chronic pyelonephritis. Transperitoneal robotic access isolated the ureteral upper third and the ureteropelvic junction from scar tissue, after dissecting the narrowed ureteral section, its length was about 3.0 cm. In this regard, plastic surgery was performed with a buccal mucosa graft, the ureter was drained with a stent. There were no postoperative complications, and on day 3 the patient was discharged. The stent was removed 4 weeks after. During the control ultrasound examination, the renal pelvicalyceal system was relatively reduced, and the patient did not notice any pain
ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ
Background. Urinary fistulas (UFs) are one of the most significant complications after partial nephrectomy. Placement of an ureteral stent eliminates urine extravasation in the majority of patients. However, some of them have persistent UFs despite upper urinary tract drainage. Such cases require retrograde injection of fibrin glue into the renal cavity through a ureteroscope or via the percutaneous approach. Some authors reported cases of simultaneous use of 2 stents and percutaneous cryoablation of the fistula, but these techniques are rare and, therefore, it is problematic to evaluate their efficacy.Objective: to evaluate the results of the new treatment method for the elimination of persistent UFs using the retrograde endoscopic percutaneous approach.Materials and methods. This study included 5 patients (3 males and 3 females) with UFs developed after kidney resection. Mean age of the patients was 55.8 years. The tumor size was 2.5 to 4.8 cm; mean R.E.N.A.L. score was 7.8. All patients had earlier undergone minimally invasive partial nephrectomy; the time between surgery and UF development varied between 3 and 10 days. Four out of 5 patients had a large amount of discharge from their paranephral drainage system, examination of which confirmed high creatinine level. Patients underwent flexible ureteropyelography in the lithotomy position. During this procedure, we identified the damaged calyx and then performed percutaneous puncture targeting the distal end of the endoscope at this calyx, ensuring that the tip of the needle appeared in the paranephral cavity in front of the injured calyx. Using the flexible ureteroscope, we inserted the needle into the pelvis, dilated the puncture opening along the string, and installed a nephrostomy drainage system (12 Fr). Then the endoscope was removed and the ureter was additionally drained with a stent. The stent was removed after 8-10 days with subsequent antegrade pyelography. If there was no extravasation, the nephrostomy tube was removed and the patient was discharged from hospital to continue treatment in outpatient settings.Results. All patients with UFs resulting from partial nephrectomy was successfully operated on. No complications were registered. The mean surgery time was 45.0 Β± 20.5 min (range: 40-65 min). Only two patients had some discharge from the fistula within 1 day after nephrostomy tube removal and it stopped without any additional interventions. Three patients had their fistula healed immediately. The treatment efficacy during the whole follow-up period of 18 Β± 4 months (range: 6-26 months) was 100 %.Conclusion. Ureteral stenting ensures elimination of UFs in the majority of patients after partial nephrectomy. In individuals with persistent UFs, retrograde endoscopic percutaneous drainage of the pelvicalyceal system is the method of choice, because it allows rapid and effective treatment of UFs.ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠΈ (ΠΠ‘) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ. Π£ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΠΈΠ· Π½ΠΈΡ
, Π½Π΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠ‘, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠΎΠΌ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π²Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΠ±ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ 2 ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ°Π±Π»Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π² Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ
, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ.Β Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ - ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΠ‘ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Β ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ 5 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² (2 ΠΌΡΠΆΡΠΈΠ½, 3 ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ) Ρ ΠΠ‘, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» 55,8 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°. Π Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π»ΡΡ ΠΎΡ 2,5 Π΄ΠΎ 4,8 ΡΠΌ, ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎ Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ R.E.N.A.L. ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎ 7,8. ΠΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΠ‘ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ
3-10 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ. Π£ 4 ΠΈΠ· 5 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΠΆΡ, ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π±ΠΈΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ» Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΡΠ΅Π°ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π°. Π Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡ. ΠΠ°Π»Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π° Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅Ρ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠΈΠΊ ΠΈΠ³Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ° ΠΈΠ³Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π² Π»ΠΎΡ
Π°Π½ΠΊΡ, ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ Π±ΡΠΆΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Π²Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΠΆ 12 Π¨Ρ. ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ. Π‘ΠΏΡΡΡΡ 8-10 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈ, Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π°Π½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ· Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΠ‘ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ Π½Π° Π°ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ»Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ‘ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π΅ Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ. ΠΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΌ 45,0 Β± 20,5 (40-65) ΠΌΠΈΠ½. ΠΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΠΆΠ° ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Ρ 2 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 1 Π΄Π½Ρ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ. Π£ 3 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ²ΠΈΡ Π·Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ» ΡΡΠ°Π·Ρ. ΠΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ 18 Β± 4 (6-26) ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° 100 %.Β ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΠ‘ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΠ‘ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π»ΠΎΡ
Π°Π½ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π² ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·Π±Π°Π²ΠΈΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ ΠΠ‘.
Endoscopic laser resection of a ureteral tumour in primary multiple malignant neoplasms
A case of the ureteral tumour endoscopic treatment is presented in a patient with primary multiple malignancies. In the case of polyneoplasia, there are usually two or more neoplasms of different localizations, including the organs of the urinary system. The kidney and prostate tumours are diagnosed more often, but in rare cases, ureter neoplasms. It is especially important to perform organ-sparing surgeries when diagnosing ureter neoplasms. In addition, chronic kidney disease after radical nephroureterectomy can be a relative contraindication to further chemoradiation therapy in polyneoplasias. In this patient, along with the breast and vulva neoplasms, a solitary tumour of the right ureter's lower third was detected, which was successfully removed endoscopically. The chosen method of minimally invasive treatment allowed to preserve a normal functioning kidney, to avoid the development of chronic kidney disease in the patient, who was later scheduled for chemotherapy