Complement and COVID-19: Three years on, what we know, what we don't know, and what we ought to know

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus was identified in China in 2019 as the causative agent of COVID-19, and quickly spread throughout the world, causing over 7 million deaths, of which 2 million occurred prior to the introduction of the first vaccine. In the following discussion, while recognising that complement is just one of many players in COVID-19, we focus on the relationship between complement and COVID-19 disease, with limited digression into directly-related areas such as the relationship between complement, kinin release, and coagulation. Prior to the 2019 COVID-19 outbreak, an important role for complement in coronavirus diseases had been established. Subsequently, multiple investigations of patients with COVID-19 confirmed that complement dysregulation is likely to be a major driver of disease pathology, in some, if not all, patients. These data fuelled evaluation of many complement-directed therapeutic agents in small patient cohorts, with claims of significant beneficial effect. As yet, these early results have not been reflected in larger clinical trials, posing questions such as who to treat, appropriate time to treat, duration of treatment, and optimal target for treatment. While significant control of the pandemic has been achieved through a global scientific and medical effort to comprehend the etiology of the disease, through extensive SARS-CoV-2 testing and quarantine measures, through vaccine development, and through improved therapy, possibly aided by attenuation of the dominant strains, it is not yet over. In this review, we summarise complement-relevant literature, emphasise its main conclusions, and formulate a hypothesis for complement involvement in COVID-19. Based on this we make suggestions as to how any future outbreak might be better managed in order to minimise impact on patients

Targeting complement in neurodegeneration: challenges, risks, and strategies

For most neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), therapeutic options are limited, providing symptomatic benefit but not impacting disease progression; new treatments addressing critical effectors in the disease process are needed. Evidence implicating complement in NDDs has accumulated over the past two decades, establishing complement dysregulation as a driver of pathology and a novel target for therapy in these diseases. Over the same period, highly effective anticomplement drugs have been developed for therapy of complement dysregulation; however, their use to date has been restricted to rare systemic diseases. Current anticomplement drugs are not fit for purpose in most NDDs because they do not adequately access the central nervous system (CNS). Blood–brain barrier-penetrant anticomplement drugs, created either by modifying current drugs or by designing new drugs, could suppress complement dysregulation, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration to halt or slow disease progression. Inhibition of complement is not without risk; this might be particularly the case in the CNS and requires close attention

Monoclonal antibodies capable of inhibiting complement downstream of C5 in multiple species

Better understanding of roles of complement in pathology has fuelled an explosion of interest in complement-targeted therapeutics. The C5-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) eculizumab, the first of the new wave of complement blocking drugs, was FDA approved for treatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria in 2007; its expansion into other diseases has been slow and remains restricted to rare and ultra-rare diseases such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. The success of eculizumab has provoked other Pharma to follow this well-trodden track and made C5 blockade the busiest area of complement drug development. C5 blockade inhibits generation of C5a and C5b, the former an anaphylatoxin, the latter the nidus for formation of the pro-inflammatory membrane attack complex. In order to use anti-complement drugs in common complement-driven diseases, more affordable and equally effective therapeutics are needed. To address this, we explored complement inhibition downstream of C5. Novel blocking mAbs targeting C7 and/or the C5b-7 complex were generated, identified using high throughput functional assays and specificity confirmed by immunochemical assays and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Selected mAbs were tested in rodents to characterize pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic capacity. Administration of a mouse C7-selective mAb to wildtype mice, or a human C7 specific mAb to C7-deficient mice reconstituted with human C7, completely inhibited serum lytic activity for >48 h. The C5b-7 complex selective mAb 2H2, most active in rat serum, efficiently inhibited serum lytic activity in vivo for over a week from a single low dose (10 mg/kg); this mAb effectively blocked disease and protected muscle endplates from destruction in a rat myasthenia model. Targeting C7 and C7-containing terminal pathway intermediates is an innovative therapeutic approach, allowing lower drug dose and lower product cost, that will facilitate the expansion of complement therapeutics to common diseases

Extracting the barbs from complement assays: Identification and optimisation of a safe substitute for traditional buffers

Complement assays have for many years utilised buffers based on barbitone (veronal) despite the well-recognised toxicity of this agent and the tight regulations on its use in most countries. The use of barbitone in complement assay buffers is steeped in history, from a time when no other suitable buffers were available. This is no longer the case, encouraging us to explore alternatives to barbitone for complement assays. We compared a simple, non-toxic HEPES buffer with commercially sourced complement fixation test diluent (CFD), the “gold standard” barbitone buffer, in several clinically relevant complement activity assays and across species. In classical pathway haemolysis assays in human and non-human serum, there was no difference in haemolytic curves or calculated haemolytic activity (CH50) between CFD and an optimised HEPES buffer (HBS) supplemented with cations. Alternative pathway haemolysis assays in human serum were also identical in the two buffers. In a complement fixation test for anti-erythrocyte antibodies, complement consumption was identical for the two buffer systems. The data demonstrate that barbitone-based buffers are unnecessary for assays of complement activity and can readily be replaced with safe and simple alternatives

Targeting terminal pathway reduces brain complement activation, amyloid load and synapse loss, and improves cognition in a mouse model of dementia

Complement is dysregulated in the brain in Alzheimer’s Disease and in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Each of the complement derived effectors, opsonins, anaphylatoxins and membrane attack complex (MAC), have been implicated as drivers of disease but their relative contributions remain unclarified. Here we have focussed on the MAC, a lytic and pro-inflammatory effector, in the AppNL−G−F mouse amyloidopathy model. To test the role of MAC, we back-crossed to generate AppNL−G−F mice deficient in C7, an essential MAC component. C7 deficiency ablated MAC formation, reduced synapse loss and amyloid load and improved cognition compared to complement-sufficient AppNL−G−F mice at 8–10 months age. Adding back C7 caused increased MAC formation in brain and an acute loss of synapses in C7-deficient AppNL−G−F mice. To explore whether C7 was a viable therapeutic target, a C7-blocking monoclonal antibody was administered systemically for one month in AppNL−G−F mice aged 8–9 months. Treatment reduced brain MAC and amyloid deposition, increased synapse density and improved cognitive performance compared to isotype control-treated AppNL−G−F mice. The findings implicate MAC as a driver of pathology and highlight the potential for complement inhibition at the level of MAC as a therapy in Alzheimer’s disease

Absence of CD59 in guinea pigs: Analysis of the Cavia porcellus genome suggests the evolution of a CD59 pseudogene

CD59 is a membrane-bound regulatory protein that inhibits the assembly of the terminal membrane attack complex (C5b-9) of complement. From its original discovery in humans almost 30 years ago, CD59 has been characterized in a variety of species, from primates to early vertebrates, such as teleost fish. CD59 is ubiquitous in mammals; however, we have described circumstantial evidence suggesting that guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) lack CD59, at least on erythrocytes. In this study, we have used a combination of phylogenetic analyses with syntenic alignment of mammalian CD59 genes to identify the only span of genomic DNA in C. porcellus that is homologous to a portion of mammalian CD59 and show that this segment of DNA is not transcribed. We describe a pseudogene sharing homology to exons 2 through 5 of human CD59 present in the C. porcellus genome. This pseudogene was flanked by C. porcellus homologs of two genes, FBXO3 and ORF91, a relationship and orientation that were consistent with other known mammalian CD59 genes. Analysis using RNA sequencing confirmed that this segment of chromosomal DNA was not transcribed. We conclude that guinea pigs lack an intact gene encoding CD59; to our knowledge, this is the first report of a mammalian species that does not express a functional CD59. The pseudogene we describe is likely the product of a genomic deletion event during its evolutionary divergence from other members of the rodent order

Compendium of current complement therapeutics

The complement system is well known for its role in innate immunity and in maintenance of tissue homeostasis, providing a first line of defence against infection and playing a key role in flagging apoptotic cells and debris for disposal. Unfortunately, complement also contributes to pathogenesis of many diseases, in some cases driving pathology, and in others amplifying or exacerbating the inflammatory and damaging impact of non-complement disease triggers. The driving role of complement in a single disease, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), provoked the development and eventual FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) approval of eculizumab (Soliris™), an anti-C5 antibody, for therapy. Although PNH is very rare, eculizumab provided clinical validation and demonstrated that inhibiting the complement system was not only well-tolerated, but also provided rapid therapy and saved lives. This clinical validation, together with advances in genetic analyses that demonstrated strong associations between complement and common diseases, drove new drug discovery programmes in both academic laboratories and large pharmaceutical companies. Numerous drugs have entered clinical development and several are in phase 3 trials; however, many have fallen by the wayside. Despite this high attrition rate, crucial lessons have been learnt and hurdles to development have become clear. These insights have driven development of next generation anti-complement drugs designed to avoid pitfalls and facilitate patient access. In this article, we do not set out to provide a text-heavy review of complement therapeutics but instead will simply highlight the targets, modalities and current status of the plethora of drugs approved or in clinical development. With such a fast-moving drug development landscape, such a compendium will inevitably become out-dated; however, we provide a snapshot of the current field and illustrate the increased choice that clinicians might enjoy in the future in selecting the best drug for their application, decisions based not only on efficacy but also cost, mechanistic target, modality and route of delivery

Characterising the original anti-C5 function-blocking antibody, BB5.1, for species specificity, mode of action and interactions with C5

The implication of complement in multiple diseases over the last twenty years has fuelled interest in developing anti‐complement drugs. To date, the focus has been on C5; blocking cleavage of C5 prevents formation of two pro‐inflammatory activities, C5a anaphylatoxin and membrane attack complex. The concept of C5 blockade to inhibit inflammation dates back thirty years to the description of BB5.1, an anti‐C5 blocking monoclonal antibody raised in C5‐deficient mice. This antibody proved an invaluable tool to demonstrate complement involvement in mouse disease models and catalysed enthusiasm for anti‐complement drug development, culminating in the anti‐human C5 monoclonal antibody ecuizumab, the most successful anti‐complement drug to date, already in the clinic for several rare diseases. Despite its key role in providing proof‐of‐concept for C5 blockade, the mechanism of BB5.1 inhibition remains poorly understood. Here we characterised BB5.1 cross‐species inhibition, C5 binding affinity and chain specificity. BB5.1 efficiently inhibited C5 in mouse serum but not in human or other rodent sera; it prevented C5 cleavage and C5a generation. BB5.1 bound the C5 α‐chain with high affinity and slow off‐rate. BB5.1 complementarity determining regions were obtained and docking algorithms used to predict the likely binding interface on mouse C5

Characterising a pH-switch anti-C5 antibody as a tool for human and mouse complement C5 purification and cross-species inhibition of classical and reactive lysis

C5 plays a major role in complement activation; C5 convertase cleaves C5 into the pro‐inflammatory C5a, and C5b, the nidus for the formation of the lytic membrane attack complex. C5 is a major target for anti‐complement drugs, necessitating better methods for the study of C5 function. Purification of C5 is complicated; classical methods involve precipitation or pH shifts that result in functional loss and low yield. We here present a method for C5 purification using a novel anti‐C5 monoclonal antibody (mAb); RO7112689 (C5i mAb, SKY59), pH‐switch engineered to induce antibody–antigen dissociation in the acidic endosome (~ pH 5·5). RO7112689 was bound on an affinity column; applied serum was completely depleted of C5. Elution at pH 5 produced fully active C5 at 98% yield. The mAb also bound C5b in the C5b6 complex, preventing C5b6 binding to target membranes and enabling purification of C5b6 from activated serum. RO7112689 inhibited C5 in mouse serum and efficiently purified mouse C5. Used as capture, RO7112689 produced sensitive and specific assays for human and mouse C5. This novel antibody enables efficient production of intact, fully active, pure human and mouse C5, and quantification of C5 in these species. The demonstration that RO7112689 binds C5b6 adds an additional mechanism of membrane attack complex inhibition by this mAb

The complement system in neurodegenerative diseases

Complement is an important component of innate immune defence against pathogens and crucial for efficient immune complex disposal. These core protective activities are dependent in large part on properly regulated complement-mediated inflammation. Dysregulated complement activation, often driven by persistence of activating triggers, is a cause of pathological inflammation in numerous diseases, including neurological diseases. Increasingly, this has become apparent not only in well-recognized neuroinflammatory diseases like multiple sclerosis but also in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases where inflammation was previously either ignored or dismissed as a secondary event. There is now a large and rapidly growing body of evidence implicating complement in neurological diseases that cannot be comprehensively addressed in a brief review. Here, we will focus on neurodegenerative diseases, including not only the ‘classical’ neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, but also two other neurological diseases where neurodegeneration is a neglected feature and complement is implicated, namely, schizophrenia, a neurodevelopmental disorder with many mechanistic features of neurodegeneration, and multiple sclerosis, a demyelinating disorder where neurodegeneration is a major cause of progressive decline. We will discuss the evidence implicating complement as a driver of pathology in these diverse diseases and address briefly the potential and pitfalls of anti-complement drug therapy for neurodegenerative diseases