4 research outputs found

    Epithelium Zernike Indices and Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Epithelial Remodeling Between Flap and Flapless Refractive Procedures

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To evaluate epithelial Zernike indices as a differentiator of epithelial remodeling after different refractive procedures. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography [OCT] images of 22 laser in situ keratomileusis, 22 small incision lenticule extraction, 15 photorefractive keratectomy [PRK], and 17 transepithelial PRK eyes were evaluated retrospectively before and after surgery. A custom algorithm was used to calculate the epithelial Zernike indices from the three-dimensional distribution of epithelial thickness distribution. The epithelial Zernike indices were also compared with the local measurements of epithelial thickness, used conventionally from the current clinical OCT. A decision tree classifier was built, one in which flap/ cap and surface procedures were classified [2G] and another in which all surgical groups were classified separately [4G]. RESULTS: Local measurements of thicknesses changed significantly after all surgeries (P .05). The surgeries not only changed the epithelial Zernike indices (P < .05), but also resulted in differential changes in epithelial thickness distribution based on the type of surgery (P < .05). In the 2G analyses with local measurements of epithelial thickness, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.57 +/- 0.07, 42.11%, and 57.89%, respectively. Further, the accuracy was limited to less than 60%. In the 2G analyses with epithelial Zernike indices, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.79 +/- 0.05, 86.4%, and 71.9%, respectively. Here, the accuracy was limited between 70% and 80%. Similar trends were observed with 4G analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The epithelial Zernike indices were significantly better in identifying surgery-specific three-dimensional remodeling of the thickness compared to local measurements of epithelial thickness. Further, the changes in Zernike indices were independent of the magnitude of refractive error but not the type of surgery

    Epithelium Zernike Indices and Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Epithelial Remodeling Between Flap and Flapless Refractive Procedures

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To evaluate epithelial Zernike indices as a differentiator of epithelial remodeling after different refractive procedures. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography [OCT] images of 22 laser in situ keratomileusis, 22 small incision lenticule extraction, 15 photorefractive keratectomy [PRK], and 17 transepithelial PRK eyes were evaluated retrospectively before and after surgery. A custom algorithm was used to calculate the epithelial Zernike indices from the three-dimensional distribution of epithelial thickness distribution. The epithelial Zernike indices were also compared with the local measurements of epithelial thickness, used conventionally from the current clinical OCT. A decision tree classifier was built, one in which flap/ cap and surface procedures were classified [2G] and another in which all surgical groups were classified separately [4G]. RESULTS: Local measurements of thicknesses changed significantly after all surgeries (P .05). The surgeries not only changed the epithelial Zernike indices (P < .05), but also resulted in differential changes in epithelial thickness distribution based on the type of surgery (P < .05). In the 2G analyses with local measurements of epithelial thickness, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.57 +/- 0.07, 42.11%, and 57.89%, respectively. Further, the accuracy was limited to less than 60%. In the 2G analyses with epithelial Zernike indices, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.79 +/- 0.05, 86.4%, and 71.9%, respectively. Here, the accuracy was limited between 70% and 80%. Similar trends were observed with 4G analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The epithelial Zernike indices were significantly better in identifying surgery-specific three-dimensional remodeling of the thickness compared to local measurements of epithelial thickness. Further, the changes in Zernike indices were independent of the magnitude of refractive error but not the type of surgery

    Status of Residual Refractive Error, Ocular Aberrations, and Accommodation After Myopic LASIK, SMILE, and TransPRK

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To analyze residual refractive error, ocular aberrations, and visual acuity (VA) during accommodation simultaneously with ocular aberrometry in eyes after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK). METHODS: Ocular aberrometry (Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX) was performed 3 months after LASIK (n = 95), SMILE (n = 73), and TransPRK (n = 35). White measuring the aberrations, VA was measured at distance (20 ft), intermediate (60 cm), and near (40 cm) targets. The examinations were done monocularly. A parallel group of age-matched normal eyes (n = 50) with 20/20 Snellen distance VA also underwent aberrometry. RESULTS: Distribution of residual spherical error of LASIK eyes matched the normal eyes the best, followed by SMILE and TransPRK. However, the distribution of cylindrical error of the SMILE eyes was distinctly different from the rest (P <.05). The SMILE eyes tended to be undercorrected by approximately 0.25 diopters (D) on average at all reading targets compared to LASIK eyes (P <.05). The undercorrection was greater when the magnitude of the preoperative cylinder exceeded 0.75 D (P <.05). The VA of LASIK and SMILE eyes was similar to normal eyes at all targets, but the TransPRK eyes were marginally inferior (P <.05). Only the ocular defocus changed differentially between the study groups during accommodation and the magnitude of change was least for TransPRK eyes (P <.05). However, postoperative near and intermediate accommodation of LASIK eyes were similar to normal eyes, followed by SMILE eyes and then TransPRK eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive and aberrometric status of the LASIK eyes was closest to the normal eyes. The SMILE procedure may benefit from slight overcorrection of the preoperative refractive cylinder

    Status of Residual Refractive Error, Ocular Aberrations, and Accommodation After Myopic LASIK, SMILE, and TransPRK

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To analyze residual refractive error, ocular aberrations, and visual acuity (VA) during accommodation simultaneously with ocular aberrometry in eyes after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK). METHODS: Ocular aberrometry (Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX) was performed 3 months after LASIK (n = 95), SMILE (n = 73), and TransPRK (n = 35). White measuring the aberrations, VA was measured at distance (20 ft), intermediate (60 cm), and near (40 cm) targets. The examinations were done monocularly. A parallel group of age-matched normal eyes (n = 50) with 20/20 Snellen distance VA also underwent aberrometry. RESULTS: Distribution of residual spherical error of LASIK eyes matched the normal eyes the best, followed by SMILE and TransPRK. However, the distribution of cylindrical error of the SMILE eyes was distinctly different from the rest (P <.05). The SMILE eyes tended to be undercorrected by approximately 0.25 diopters (D) on average at all reading targets compared to LASIK eyes (P <.05). The undercorrection was greater when the magnitude of the preoperative cylinder exceeded 0.75 D (P <.05). The VA of LASIK and SMILE eyes was similar to normal eyes at all targets, but the TransPRK eyes were marginally inferior (P <.05). Only the ocular defocus changed differentially between the study groups during accommodation and the magnitude of change was least for TransPRK eyes (P <.05). However, postoperative near and intermediate accommodation of LASIK eyes were similar to normal eyes, followed by SMILE eyes and then TransPRK eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive and aberrometric status of the LASIK eyes was closest to the normal eyes. The SMILE procedure may benefit from slight overcorrection of the preoperative refractive cylinder
    corecore