Association between admission-blood-glucose-to-albumin ratio and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

IntroductionIt is unclear whether admission-blood-glucose-to-albumin ratio (AAR) predicts adverse clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we performed a observational study to explore the predictive value of AAR on clinical outcomes.MethodsPatients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent PCI between January 2010 and February 2020 were enrolled in the study. The patients were classified into three groups according to AAR tertile. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), as well as all-cause mortality and MACEs during follow-up. Logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazard regression were the primary analyses used to estimate outcomes.ResultsAmong the 3,224 enrolled patients, there were 130 cases of in-hospital all-cause mortality (3.9%) and 181 patients (5.4%) experienced MACEs. After adjustment for covariates, multivariate analysis demonstrated that an increase in AAR was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.72, 95% CI: 1.47–5.03, P = 0.001] and MACEs (adjusted OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.18–3.10, P = 0.009), as well as long-term all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19–2.28, P = 0.003] and MACEs (adjusted HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.16–2.14, P = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that AAR was an accurate predictor of in-hospital all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.718, 95% CI: 0.675–0.761) and MACEs (AUC = 0.672, 95% CI: 0.631–0.712).DiscussionAAR is a novel and convenient independent predictor of all-cause mortality and MACEs, both in-hospital and long-term, for STEMI patients receiving PCI

Prognostic Value of Optical Flow Ratio among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease after Percutaneous Coronary Treatment: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Cohort Investigation

Objective: The goal of this study was to examine the prognostic performance of optical flow ratio (OFR) among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We recruited patients with CAD undergoing optical coherence tomography (OCT)-directed PCI between January 2019 and June 2021 for our single-center, hospital-based, retrospective cohort investigation. We assessed the link between post-PCI OFR and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) via multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the best post-PCI OFR threshold for MACE was 0.91, and introduction of OFR into the baseline profile and OCT results markedly enhanced MACE identification after PCI. On the basis of survival curves, patients with OFR ≤0.91 (P 0.91. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that OFR ≤0.91 (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24–10.44; P = 0.019), and TCFA (HR: 3.63; 95% CI: 1.42–9.20; P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for MACE, and OFR ≤0.91 was independently associated with MI (HR: 14.64; 95% CI: 3.27–65.54; P < 0.001). Conclusion: OFR after PCI is an independent MACE bio-indicator among patients with CAD. Adding OFR to post-PCI OCT results may potentially enhance MACE prediction

Morphometric Assessment for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis with Optical Coherence Tomography and the Optical Flow Ratio in a Vessel with Single Stenosis

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis in a vessel with single stenosis. Background: The OCT-based morphofunctional computational method for deriving the optical flow ratio (OFR) has diagnostic value, as it can identify the functional severity of coronary stenosis, but the ability of the OFR to aid the OCT in determining coronary stenosis hemodynamics in single-stenosis lesion remains unclear. Methods: 74 vessels with single stenosis were studied in 69 patients; all cases were performed through OCT and quantitative flow ratio (QFR), and OCT images were used to perform OFR. Results: Among vessels with single stenosis, OFR showed a good correlation with QFR (r = 0.86; p p p 2 and 1.40 mm. Conclusions: OFR has a good correlation with QFR. OCT-measured MLA and MLD have excellent diagnostic efficiency in identifying the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis in a vessel with single stenosis