Osteoporosis in Men with Diabetes Mellitus

Osteoporosis is more common in women than in men. The prevalence in men is not defined yet; however it is becoming much more recognized as its prevalence and impact have become explicable. It is estimated that around 1% of bone mineral density is lost in men every year. Studies show that secondary osteoporosis is the major cause thus, making it important to define the disorders associated with male osteoporosis. Diabetes is a risk factor for bone fractures. In male patients with diabetes measures should be undertaken such as encouraging exercise, assuring adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, and treating diabetic complications

Thyroid Disorders and Diabetes Mellitus

Studies have found that diabetes and thyroid disorders tend to coexist in patients. Both conditions involve a dysfunction of the endocrine system. Thyroid disorders can have a major impact on glucose control, and untreated thyroid disorders affect the management of diabetes in patients. Consequently, a systematic approach to thyroid testing in patients with diabetes is recommended

The role of adipokines in gestational diabetes mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a complication of pregnancy that is characterized by impaired glucose tolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. The reported prevalence of GDM varies between 0.6% and 20% of pregnancies depending on screening method, gestational age and the population studied. GDM is characterized by pancreatic β-cell function that is insufficient to meet the body’s insulin needs. Available evidence suggests that β-cell defects in GDM result from the same spectrum of causes that underline hyperglycemia in general, including autoimmune disease, monogenic causes and insulin resistance. Adipokines are proteins secreted from the adipocytes and are believed to have a metabolic influence. Our review suggests that, in GDM, various adipokines, mainly leptin and adiponectin, are dysregulated. These two adipokines might have both prognostic and pathophysiological significance in this disease

Glycemic effects of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes before, during and after the period of fasting in Ramadan

Objective To study the incidence of hypoglycemia, glycemic control and body weight changes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with vildagliptin and metformin versus another group treated with sulphonylureas and metformin during and after the period of fasting in Ramadan. Patients and methods This is a randomized open-label clinical trial that recruited 69 patients previously treated with a combination therapy of metformin and sulphonylurea. Patients in the control group were maintained on their usual metformin and sulphonylurea regimen with dose adjustment for the fasting period. Patients in the study group were given vildagliptin 50 mg twice daily (at Suhur and at Iftar). One group remained on the previous background therapy unchanged and the other group was switched from sulphonylurea to vildagliptin in combination with metformin. Four visits were scheduled, one before the beginning of Ramadan (baseline), a second visit at mid Ramadan, a third at the end of Ramadan and a final visit 1 month after the end of Ramadan. At every visit, patients were assessed for hypoglycemic events and patient education was given on lifestyle needs and hypoglycemia monitoring and management. Results The calculated change in hemoglobin A1c from baseline to last visit was similar for both groups. The incidence of hypoglycemia during Ramadan was higher in the control group (26 episodes versus 19 episodes in the study group); this result was not statistically significant ( p = 0.334). However, the number of patients who dropped out from the study because of discomfort due to treatment and fear of hypoglycemia was higher in the control group. Conclusion For patients who insist on observing the fast, physicians can allow it only with close follow up and monitoring for hypoglycemic events, and vildagliptin may be a better agent than sulphonylurea