Histology independent drug development - Is this the future for cancer drugs?

The Cancer Drug Development Forum (CDDF)’s ‘Histology independent drug development – is this the future for cancer drugs?’ workshop was set up to explore the current landscape of histology independent drug development, review the current regulatory landscape and propose recommendations for improving the conduct of future trials.The first session considered lessons learnt from previous trials, including innovative solutions for reimbursement. The session explored why overall survival represents the most valuable endpoint, and the importance of duration of response, which can be captured with swimmer and spider plots.The second session on biomarker development and treatment optimisation considered current regulations for companion diagnostics, FDA guidance on histology independent drug development in oncology, and the need to establish cut-offs for the biomarker of tumour mutational burden to identify the patients most likely to benefit from PDL1 treatment.The third session reviewed novel trial designs, including basket, umbrella and platform trials, and statistical approaches of hierarchical modelling where homogeneity between study cohorts enables information to be borrowed between cohorts. The discussion highlighted the need to agree ‘common assessment standards’ to facilitate pooling of data across studies.In the fourth session, the sharing of data sets was recognised as a key step for improving equity of access to precision medicines across Europe. The session considered how the European Health Data Space (EHDS) could streamline access to medical records, emphasizing the importance of introducing greater accountability into the digital space.In conclusion the workshop proposed 11 recommendations to facilitate histology agnostic drug development.</p

Circulating levels of cell adhesion molecule L1 as a prognostic marker in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>L1 cell adhesion molecule (CD171) is expressed in many malignant tumors and its expression correlates with unfavourable outcome. It thus represents a target for tumor diagnosis and therapy. An earlier study conducted by our group identified L1 expression levels in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) as a prognostic marker. The aim of the current study was to compare L1 serum levels of GIST patients with those of healthy controls and to determine whether levels of soluble L1 in sera could serve as a prognostic marker.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), soluble L1 was measured in sera of 93 GIST patients und 151 healthy controls. Soluble L1 levels were then correlated with clinicopathological data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Median levels of soluble L1 were significantly higher (<it>p </it>< 0.001; Mann-Whitney U test) in sera of GIST patients compared to healthy individuals. Median soluble L1 levels were particularly elevated in patients with recurrence and relapse (<it>p </it>< 0.05; Mann Whitney U test).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results suggest that high soluble L1 levels predict poor prognosis and may thus be a promising tumor marker that can contribute to individualise therapy.</p

ALCAM (CD166) Expression and Serum Levels in Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the expression of the activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) in pancreatic cancer (PAC) and to determine whether or not the ectodomain shedding of ALCAM (s-ALCAM) could serve as a biomarker in the peripheral blood of PAC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tissue specimens and blood sera of patients with PAC (n = 264 and n = 116, respectively) and the sera of 115 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) were analyzed via ALCAM immunohistochemistry and s-ALCAM ELISA tests. Results were correlated with clinical, histopathological, and patient survival data (Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, respectively). RESULTS: ALCAM was expressed in the majority of PAC lesions. Immunohistochemistry and serum ELISA tests revealed no association between ALCAM expression in primary tumors or s-ALCAM and clinical or histopathological data. Neither ALCAM nor s-ALCAM showed a significant impact regarding overall survival (p = 0.261 and p = 0.660, respectively). S-ALCAM serum levels were significantly elevated compared to the sera of CP patients (p<0.001). The sensitivity of s-ALCAM in detecting PAC was 58.6% at a specificity of 73.9% (AUC = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: ALCAM is expressed in the majority of PAC lesions, but statistical analysis revealed no association with clinical or pathological data. Although significantly elevated in patients with PAC, the sensitivity and specificity of the s-ALCAM serum quantification test was low. Therefore, its potential as a novel diagnostic marker for PAC remains elusive and further investigations are required

Checkpointinhibitoren in der Tumortherapie

In recent years, a breakthrough in tumor therapy was achieved with the development of checkpoint inhibitors. Checkpoint inhibitors activate the immune defense against tumors by overcoming the inhibitory effect of specific cell surface proteins acting as control points, the so-called checkpoints. This article provides an overview of the mode of action of approved checkpoint inhibitors and the status of current clinical development.The previously approved checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies directed against the checkpoints CTLA‑4 and PD-1/PD-L1, are used in various tumor entities (including lung, kidney, and urothelial carcinoma; head and neck cancer; melanoma; and Hodgkin lymphoma). For the first time, long-term survival has been achieved in some of these patients with advanced tumors. Unfortunately, this efficacy can be observed only in a small proportion of the treated patients, depending on the tumor indication. Improved efficacy is envisioned by patient selection via predictive biomarkers and the development of combination therapies. Mandatory testing of the expression level of the predictive PD-L1 biomarker is already required in some indications to select patients with an enhanced benefit/risk relationship

The EMA assessment of pembrolizumab as monotherapy for the first-line treatment of adult patients with metastatic microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer

On 21 January 2021, the European Commission amended the marketing authorisation granted for pembrolizumab to include the first-line treatment of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in adults. The recommended dose of pembrolizumab was either 200 mg every 3 weeks or 400 mg every 6 weeks by intravenous infusion. Pembrolizumab was evaluated in a phase III, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial versus standard of care (SOC: FOLFOX6/FOLFIRI alone or in combination with bevacizumab/cetuximab) as first-line treatment of locally confirmed mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high stage IV CRC. Subjects randomised to the SOC arm had the option to crossover and receive pembrolizumab once disease progressed. Both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were primary endpoints. Pembrolizumab showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with SOC, with a hazard ratio of 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.80], P = 0.0002. Median PFS was 16.5 (95% CI: 5.4-32.4) versus 8.2 (95% CI: 6.1-10.2) months for the pembrolizumab versus SOC arms, respectively. The most frequent adverse events in patients receiving pembrolizumab were diarrhoea, fatigue, pruritus, nausea, increased aspartate aminotransferase, rash, arthralgia, and hypothyroidism. Having reviewed the data submitted, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) considered that the benefit–risk balance was positive. This is the first time the CHMP has issued an opinion for a target population defined by DNA repair deficiency biomarkers. The aim of this manuscript is to summarise the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the European Union

Relevance of activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) in tumor tissue and sera of cervical cancer patients

Abstract Background An altered expression of the activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) is associated with cancer progression in various cancer types. In some cancers ALCAM has a prognostic value or is predictive for the benefit of therapeutic interventions. To date there are no data on the role of ALCAM in cervical cancer available. Methods In this study, ALCAM expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissue samples of 233 patients with cervical cancer, among them 178 with complete follow-up information. In addition, soluble (s-)ALCAM was measured in sera of a subset of the included patients (n = 55) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results ALCAM overexpression was detected (immunoreactive score (IRS) 2-12) in 58.4% of the cervical cancer samples. The normal ectocervical or endocervical epithelium showed no ALCAM reactivity. In untreated patients, ALCAM overexpression in tumor tissue tended to be associated with shorter cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Patients, whose tumor samples showed ALCAM overexpression receiving a cytotoxic therapy like radiotherapy or chemoradiation, however, had a favourable prognosis compared to those patients, whose cancers showed no or minimal ALCAM staining. This effect was particularly apparent in patients receiving chemoradiation where the CSS was significantly longer in patients with ALCAM-positive tumors (p = 0.038; cumulative incidence rates at 96 months 8%, 95% CI 0%-23%, and 26%, CI 3%-43% in ALCAM-positive and ALCAM-negative cases, respectively). Median preoperative s-ALCAM concentration in sera from tumor patients was 27.6 ng/ml (range 17.5-55.1 ng/ml, mean 28.9 ng/ml), serum levels did not correlate with intratumoral ALCAM expression. Conclusions The data of our retrospective study suggest that the prognostic value of ALCAM expression in cervical carcinoma might be therapy-dependent, and that ALCAM might function as a predictive marker for the response to chemoradiation. This should be confirmed in further, prospective studies.</p

The European Medicines Agency review of the initial application of atezolizumab and the role of PD-L1 expression as biomarker for checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionised cancer therapeutics. Translational research evaluating the role of biomarkers is essential to identify the ideal target population for these drugs. From a regulatory perspective, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic assays is strongly encouraged by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The aim of this article is to analyse the role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as a predictive biomarker in relation to the data submitted for the initial assessment of atezolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting human PD-L1. On 20 July 2017, atezolizumab was granted a marketing authorisation valid throughout the European Union (EU) for adult patients with (i) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemotherapy and (ii) locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) after chemotherapy or cisplatin-ineligibility. Initially, these indications were not restricted by the level of PD-L1 expression, but preliminary data from an ongoing phase III trial in patients with UC led to a restriction in the UC indication to cisplatin-ineligible patients whose tumours have ≥5% PD-L1 expression. Still, the role of PD-L1 expression as predictive biomarker for atezolizumab therapy remains inconclusive and further research is needed. Data in this paper came from the scientific review leading to the initial regulatory approval of atezolizumab in the EU and its complementary application for indication (EMEA/H/C/004143/II/0010). The full scientific assessment report and product information are available on the EMA website (www.ema.europa.eu)