The DnaK chaperones from the archaeon Methanosarcina mazei and the bacterium Escherichia coli have different substrate specificities

Hsp70 (DnaK) is a highly conserved molecular chaperone present in bacteria, eukaryotes, and some archaea. In a previous work we demonstrated that DnaK from the archaeon Methanosarcina mazei (DnaK(Mm)) and the DnaK from the bacterium Escherichia coli (DnaK(Ec)) were functionally similar when assayed in vitro but DnaK(Mm) failed to substitute for DnaK(Ec) in vivo. Searching for the molecular basis of the observed DnaK species specificity we compared substrate binding by DnaK(Mm) and DnaK(Ec). DnaK(Mm) showed a lower affinity for the model peptide (a-CALLQSRLLS) compared to DnaK(Ec). Furthermore, it was unable to negatively regulate the E. coli sigma32 transcription factor level under heat shock conditions and poorly bound purified sigma32, which is a native substrate of DnaK(Ec). These observations taken together indicate differences in substrate specificity of archaeal and bacterial DnaKs. Structural modeling of DnaK(Mm) showed some structural differences in the substrate-binding domains of DnaK(Mm) and DnaK(Ec), which may be responsible, at least partially, for the differences in peptide binding. Size-exclusion chromatography and native gel electrophoresis revealed that DnaK(Mm) was found preferably in high molecular mass oligomeric forms, contrary to DnaK(Ec). Oligomers of DnaK(Mm) could be dissociated in the presence of ATP and a substrate (peptide) but not ADP, which may suggest that monomer is the active form of DnaK(Mm)

EFFECTS OF WHOLE BODY VIBRATION ON STRENGTH AND JUMPING PERFORMANCE IN VOLLEYBALL AND BEACH VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS

The primary aim of this study was to examine the effects of 6-week strength training with whole body vibration (WBV) on leg strength and jumping performance in volleyball and beach volleyball players. Twenty-three sub-elite male volleyball (VB; n=12) and beach volleyball players (BVB; n=11) aged 21.2±3.0 years were divided into two groups and subjected to 6 weeks of strength training (three one-hour sessions per week): (I) 12 players (6 VB and 6 BVB players) underwent training with WBV (30-40 Hz, 1.7-2.5 mm, 3.0-5.7 g), and (II) 11 players (6 VB and 5 BVB players) underwent traditional strength training. Squat jump (SJ) and countermovement squat jump (CMJ) measurements by the Ergo Tester contact platform and maximum leg press test (1RM) were conducted. Three-factor (2 time x 2 WBV use x 2 discipline) analysis of variance for SJ, CMJ and 1RM revealed a significant time main effect (p<0.001), a WBV use effect (p<0.001) and a discipline effect (p<0.001). Significantly greater improvements in the SJ (p<0.001) and CMJ (p<0.001) and in 1RM (p<0.001) were found in the WBV training groups than in traditional training groups. Significant 3-way interaction effects (training, WBV use, discipline kind) were also found for SJ, CMJ and 1RM (p=0.001, p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively). It can be concluded that implementation of 6-week WBV training in routine practice in volleyball and beach volleyball players increases leg strength more and leads to greater improvement in jump performance than traditional strength training, but greater improvements can be expected in beach volleyball players than in volleyball players